Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Not the women I know.

You can have anyone of my five wives.

Thanks you for that kind offer Fred but one's enough thanks -):

stan - i have a feeling that the notice wasn't actually that short but that it wasn't greatly publicised .... can't remember exactly but heard it on the wireless a month or two back

however, can one really object that the pensionable age for women be made the same as for men? ..... after all, their lifespan is actually a few years longer

with regards to pensions in general, these have been a target for boosting gov't revenues for at least a decade or two, by lowering the amount of tax benefit on them to imposing taxes on the funds that provide the source of the pension

I cant get my head around the pensions thingy at all.

But I cant help thinking that two neighbours, one aged 65 now, and the other 65 next year will have a difference of £35 a week in their basic pensions, and the gov expects this to fly.

What are the pensions gods/politicians thinking/drinking?

Max.

Their own vanity!

Alf, I have no problem in an "age adjustment" on start of Retirement Pensions for Women or indeed Men but it's the "very short notice" given to Women especially that I think has been outrageous.

Also when one considers that an awful lot of Women have not worked or worked part time so have accrued less credits.

as i wrote before .....
i have a feeling that the notice wasn't actually that short but that it wasn't greatly publicised

Max.

But Haze will probably have the latest Lynton and Dave's spin on it:


There is the connection:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/12010764/Tatler-Tory-scandal-22-year-old-activists-lost-night-with-MP.html


Tatler Tory scandal: 22-year-old activist's 'lost night' with MP
Party source tells The Telegraph young woman has "no recollection" of how she ended up staying the night with politician
Mark Clarke in 2006
Mark Clarke was dubbed the "Tatler Tory" after the society magazine tipped him for cabinet stardom before the 2010 Election Photo: Martin Pope/The Telegraph
By Tom Morgan and Laura Hughes10:00PM GMT 22 Nov 2015
Conservative chiefs investigating the "Tatler Tory" sleaze scandal have received a complaint about a 22-year-old activist who claims she woke up naked in a Tory MP's bed with no memory of the night before.
The incident was raised to Tory HQ by a concerned friend who said the Conservative campaigner is terrified the incident could derail her career.

-=-===

What do the tories get up to at their parties.

Fred.

Are we supposed to give any credence to that story?

The woman seems to have a memory problem.

ie, why did it take 9 years to come back to her?

This is why I haven't squelched Fred,kept me amused for years. The Labour Party is imploding and still he bangs on about the Conservatives. He's a clever wind up merchant. Every credit he's red till he dies, no embarrassment shown. :0)

she might not recollect how she got into this chap's bed, but there's no indication that she didn't volunteer ....... and why should she not?

Politicians, by their very nature, are con-men....I have no trouble at all believing he talked the pants off her.

That's not a crime as far as I know.

Fred are you there ??? i can't see !!!

hardly a rarity for a young chap to try and talk a young dolly into bed, nor for a young dolly to be equally enthusiastic
claiming "non-recollection" of how one got into that place is also pretty risible

"as i wrote before .....
i have a feeling that the notice wasn't actually that short but that it wasn't greatly publicised"

it was both, so still doesn't alter the fact that it was done on the sly, a number of Women when they realise are very angry about it, but as I say instead of mobilising into an effective pressure group they just except the imposition.. that said it still does not make it right not least because it doesn't help our economy either.

a tenable view i suppose, though not exactly done on the sly

Very tenable and exactly done on the sly.

if you say so

What do you mean by that? -):

well back home for two weeks .
the hunt for the terrorist muslim he is being protected by muslims .
so that confirms that they are all for isil and agree with the terrorist acts
how can you believe any muslim when their community are hiding and protecting a
murdering scum bag . so in my view all muslims agree and want us all dead .

if they are not then why are they protecting a terrorist .
they keep telling the world how close their community is so they no where he is
yet silent .
islam is a evil religion