Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


jimmy b - 24 Jun 2005 08:28 - 6507 of 27111

You got that from British Bulls insider, they tell you to buy and sell as the price fluctuates, thats not a , sell your shares the company is going nowhere recommendation .. Your making yourself look a bit desperate there...JB..

Sequestor - 24 Jun 2005 08:36 - 6508 of 27111

lol

paulmasterson1 - 24 Jun 2005 08:49 - 6509 of 27111

JB Hi,

Yeah, it looks like buying is the current trend anyway, so British Bulls will change to 'buy' at the end of the day :))))

It's sad for ii, he comes accross as stupid, devious and desperate, whereas if he cam accross as clever, honest, and happy, SEO bulls like me might be a minute fraction worried, but were not, because it's never going to happen :))))

Cheers,
PM

andysmith - 24 Jun 2005 09:06 - 6510 of 27111

ii talks out of his japs eye, thats what happens when you spend all day bashing!! Anyway, day off, things to do. Have good one folks.

insiderinside - 24 Jun 2005 09:20 - 6511 of 27111

Exactly as expected MMs quite happily raise the price to sell off to a mini buying spell Friday morning after the RHPS update (which was a yawn yawn same again) - the sellers happily waiting for the price rise to level off before selling for an improved bid price.


Looks like those interims expected on the 29th June are going to be delayed - and thats bad news - wait and see - I am informed they will be delayed owing to the losses they contain and they do not want anyone looking into their books too soon - they want to try to pull off some more spin and smoke and mirrors - before reporting - can they do it - or will the interim reporting just keep going backwards and finally have to be reported due to time limit finished - delayed reporting is a sign of a piss poor company thats in trouble ;-)

Chiva20 - 24 Jun 2005 09:25 - 6512 of 27111

muppet

proptrade - 24 Jun 2005 09:28 - 6513 of 27111

ii - banter is one thing but you are very close to the mark here.

i have a question...WHO HAS INFORMED YOU????????????

there are many on these threads who are far less knowledgable about mkts and the city...don't spread false rumours. that is out of order. have a view (as negative as you like), fine but it is incredibly bad form to blatantly lie.

rgds
PT

ptholden - 24 Jun 2005 09:35 - 6514 of 27111

prop

Had this muppet squelched ever since he appeared, but had to have a look at this 'informed' business. I think he's not only close to the mark but over it. To state that he has inside information is clearly a breach of LSE regulations. Post copied below to ensure he cannot retrospectively edit, aplogies to the rest of the posters who don't wnat to read his rubbish.

pth

insiderinside - 24 Jun'05 - 09:20 - 6510 of 6512


Looks like those interims expected on the 29th June are going to be delayed - and thats bad news - wait and see - I am informed they will be delayed owing to the losses they contain and they do not want anyone looking into their books too soon - they want to try to pull off some more spin and smoke and mirrors - before reporting - can they do it - or will the interim reporting just keep going backwards and finally have to be reported due to time limit finished - delayed reporting is a sign of a piss poor company thats in trouble ;-)

Sequestor - 24 Jun 2005 09:48 - 6515 of 27111

Just for balance MAM should ban him and PMT

insiderinside - 24 Jun 2005 09:50 - 6516 of 27111

The MMs got stuck with quite a few MILLION sells yesterday - so they will be more than happy to raise the price up to start with while people buy the slack - and then drop it down later in the afternoon perhaps ? ;-)

PT and PTH - being informed by someone of their view of proceedings does not represent being out of line - I have made no reference to "insider" knowledge - purely from a source of mine who informs me of his take on events - I have therefore been informed - have a knowledge of English - you read things with such a negative slant.

insiderinside - 24 Jun 2005 09:52 - 6517 of 27111

I will be waiting to see if Interims are reported on the 29th June - or if they will not be - quite simple - puddings and all that.

robinhood - 24 Jun 2005 09:54 - 6518 of 27111

ii, unlike the others I really appreciate your "well researched" views. It would be greatly appreciated if you can recommend another stock that is worth shorting. You see, I have got some spare cash that i want to invest and I reckon if I do the OPPOSITE of what you recommend I am bound to be getting onto a winner again......

insiderinside - 24 Jun 2005 09:58 - 6519 of 27111

Try YOO Robin - another one of PM1s pump and dump shares IMO ! ;-)

He did well on AQL though on ADFN - poor holders today do not know what hit them - the saying a fool and their money springs to mind.

insiderinside - 24 Jun 2005 10:04 - 6520 of 27111

Post it again in case you claim not to have seen it -

PT and PTH - being informed by someone of their view of proceedings does not represent being out of line - I have made no reference to "insider" knowledge - purely from a source of mine who informs me of his take on events - I have therefore been informed - have a knowledge of English - you read things with such a negative slant.

All I can say is lets wait for the 29th June.

insiderinside - 24 Jun 2005 10:05 - 6521 of 27111

Time for lunch - TTFN

robinhood - 24 Jun 2005 10:11 - 6522 of 27111

ii, thanks for the tip on YOO and will consider it accordingly. At the very least your info is very good news for YOO holders indeed

roma - 24 Jun 2005 10:25 - 6523 of 27111

ii is correct. A fool and his money are soon parted,if you had paid any attention to what he said and sold seo at 18p,you would have been parted with your money. He has no shares in seo yet,spends most of his time writing rubbish about them. If he had bought himself,instead of slaging them off,he would have made himself enought money, to at least, bought himself a brain. "WARNING PAYING ATTENTION TO II CAN DANAGE YOUR WEALTH"

Chiva20 - 24 Jun 2005 10:39 - 6524 of 27111

He's abroad I think. Lunch at 10am, posts in the middle of the night. Must be very bored!! I think Eric said he suspects ii a paid basher probably for BPRG. I suspect he's right, just not normal to put so much energy into something out of the goodness of your heart. What planet is he on?

paulmasterson1 - 24 Jun 2005 10:42 - 6525 of 27111



So iidiot is still stalking me, this time to the YOO BB, simply BECAUSE I AM VERY BULLISH ON THEM ....

YOO will be 8p soon, and you heard it from me first, so please do have a very good long laugh at another LOSING iidiot short within 3 weeks !!!!

iidiot, you are one very sick and extremely twisted BASHING LOSER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

insiderinside - 24 Jun 2005 11:28 - 6526 of 27111

Picked up from elsewhere (FYB - Oblov) - Implications - Thermoforming Biodegradable trays might infringe prior art of patents already in place - Stanelco's application is under review but this prior art could have serious implications - another BPRG court case scenario perhaps ??


"I said I'd try to trace the Patents located by the examiners in the official search for the Stanelco Patent.

See my posts a couple of pages back.

This is the most serious of the patents containing prior art found by the examiners - take a look and make up your minds as to whether you think the Stanelco application is novel bearing in mind this earlier Patent - I'm making no comment!

http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=US5639518& amp;F=0
"
Register now or login to post to this thread.