bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
andysmith
- 24 Jun 2005 09:06
- 6510 of 27111
ii talks out of his japs eye, thats what happens when you spend all day bashing!! Anyway, day off, things to do. Have good one folks.
insiderinside
- 24 Jun 2005 09:20
- 6511 of 27111
Exactly as expected MMs quite happily raise the price to sell off to a mini buying spell Friday morning after the RHPS update (which was a yawn yawn same again) - the sellers happily waiting for the price rise to level off before selling for an improved bid price.
Looks like those interims expected on the 29th June are going to be delayed - and thats bad news - wait and see - I am informed they will be delayed owing to the losses they contain and they do not want anyone looking into their books too soon - they want to try to pull off some more spin and smoke and mirrors - before reporting - can they do it - or will the interim reporting just keep going backwards and finally have to be reported due to time limit finished - delayed reporting is a sign of a piss poor company thats in trouble ;-)
Chiva20
- 24 Jun 2005 09:25
- 6512 of 27111
muppet
proptrade
- 24 Jun 2005 09:28
- 6513 of 27111
ii - banter is one thing but you are very close to the mark here.
i have a question...WHO HAS INFORMED YOU????????????
there are many on these threads who are far less knowledgable about mkts and the city...don't spread false rumours. that is out of order. have a view (as negative as you like), fine but it is incredibly bad form to blatantly lie.
rgds
PT
ptholden
- 24 Jun 2005 09:35
- 6514 of 27111
prop
Had this muppet squelched ever since he appeared, but had to have a look at this 'informed' business. I think he's not only close to the mark but over it. To state that he has inside information is clearly a breach of LSE regulations. Post copied below to ensure he cannot retrospectively edit, aplogies to the rest of the posters who don't wnat to read his rubbish.
pth
insiderinside - 24 Jun'05 - 09:20 - 6510 of 6512
Looks like those interims expected on the 29th June are going to be delayed - and thats bad news - wait and see - I am informed they will be delayed owing to the losses they contain and they do not want anyone looking into their books too soon - they want to try to pull off some more spin and smoke and mirrors - before reporting - can they do it - or will the interim reporting just keep going backwards and finally have to be reported due to time limit finished - delayed reporting is a sign of a piss poor company thats in trouble ;-)
Sequestor
- 24 Jun 2005 09:48
- 6515 of 27111
Just for balance MAM should ban him and PMT
insiderinside
- 24 Jun 2005 09:50
- 6516 of 27111
The MMs got stuck with quite a few MILLION sells yesterday - so they will be more than happy to raise the price up to start with while people buy the slack - and then drop it down later in the afternoon perhaps ? ;-)
PT and PTH - being informed by someone of their view of proceedings does not represent being out of line - I have made no reference to "insider" knowledge - purely from a source of mine who informs me of his take on events - I have therefore been informed - have a knowledge of English - you read things with such a negative slant.
insiderinside
- 24 Jun 2005 09:52
- 6517 of 27111
I will be waiting to see if Interims are reported on the 29th June - or if they will not be - quite simple - puddings and all that.
robinhood
- 24 Jun 2005 09:54
- 6518 of 27111
ii, unlike the others I really appreciate your "well researched" views. It would be greatly appreciated if you can recommend another stock that is worth shorting. You see, I have got some spare cash that i want to invest and I reckon if I do the OPPOSITE of what you recommend I am bound to be getting onto a winner again......
insiderinside
- 24 Jun 2005 09:58
- 6519 of 27111
Try YOO Robin - another one of PM1s pump and dump shares IMO ! ;-)
He did well on AQL though on ADFN - poor holders today do not know what hit them - the saying a fool and their money springs to mind.
insiderinside
- 24 Jun 2005 10:04
- 6520 of 27111
Post it again in case you claim not to have seen it -
PT and PTH - being informed by someone of their view of proceedings does not represent being out of line - I have made no reference to "insider" knowledge - purely from a source of mine who informs me of his take on events - I have therefore been informed - have a knowledge of English - you read things with such a negative slant.
All I can say is lets wait for the 29th June.
insiderinside
- 24 Jun 2005 10:05
- 6521 of 27111
Time for lunch - TTFN
robinhood
- 24 Jun 2005 10:11
- 6522 of 27111
ii, thanks for the tip on YOO and will consider it accordingly. At the very least your info is very good news for YOO holders indeed
roma
- 24 Jun 2005 10:25
- 6523 of 27111
ii is correct. A fool and his money are soon parted,if you had paid any attention to what he said and sold seo at 18p,you would have been parted with your money. He has no shares in seo yet,spends most of his time writing rubbish about them. If he had bought himself,instead of slaging them off,he would have made himself enought money, to at least, bought himself a brain. "WARNING PAYING ATTENTION TO II CAN DANAGE YOUR WEALTH"
Chiva20
- 24 Jun 2005 10:39
- 6524 of 27111
He's abroad I think. Lunch at 10am, posts in the middle of the night. Must be very bored!! I think Eric said he suspects ii a paid basher probably for BPRG. I suspect he's right, just not normal to put so much energy into something out of the goodness of your heart. What planet is he on?
paulmasterson1
- 24 Jun 2005 10:42
- 6525 of 27111
So iidiot is still stalking me, this time to the YOO BB, simply BECAUSE I AM VERY BULLISH ON THEM ....
YOO will be 8p soon, and you heard it from me first, so please do have a very good long laugh at another LOSING iidiot short within 3 weeks !!!!
iidiot, you are one very sick and extremely twisted BASHING LOSER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
insiderinside
- 24 Jun 2005 11:28
- 6526 of 27111
Picked up from elsewhere (FYB - Oblov) - Implications - Thermoforming Biodegradable trays might infringe prior art of patents already in place - Stanelco's application is under review but this prior art could have serious implications - another BPRG court case scenario perhaps ??
"I said I'd try to trace the Patents located by the examiners in the official search for the Stanelco Patent.
See my posts a couple of pages back.
This is the most serious of the patents containing prior art found by the examiners - take a look and make up your minds as to whether you think the Stanelco application is novel bearing in mind this earlier Patent - I'm making no comment!
http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=US5639518& amp;F=0
"
forest
- 24 Jun 2005 11:29
- 6527 of 27111
PM1
Have you been posting on liberty post.org? just had a google alert for seo but the contents have been deleted.
insiderinside
- 24 Jun 2005 11:30
- 6528 of 27111
Paul - you know I do not short - LOL - do you have a memory problem - or just like to continue your lies about me ? ;-)
insiderinside
- 24 Jun 2005 11:33
- 6529 of 27111
forest Paul posts about SE0 on here - ADFN - Guru - Yahoo - A2S - FYB - SF - Liberty and so on and so on - pumping it to the heights above heaven IMO with PIs.