Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

PC & MAC CLINIC - On line problem solving. (CPU)     

Crocodile - 16 Dec 2002 03:59

ThePublisher - 31 Jan 2008 19:48 - 6525 of 11003

But it does not stop triple posts..........

greekman - 31 Jan 2008 19:53 - 6526 of 11003

The Publisher,

Thanks. It does look good but if I can get a good one for nothing (typical Yorkshire man) I will try it.

Greek.

hewittalan6 - 31 Jan 2008 22:59 - 6527 of 11003

Hi Greek,
Try here
Alan

hewittalan6 - 31 Jan 2008 23:00 - 6528 of 11003

Can't get the damn link working!!!!
www.regsofts.com

Kayak - 31 Jan 2008 23:15 - 6529 of 11003

Not sure why you're doing all of this, greekman, from the links Optimist posted it looks to me like teatime.exe is just part of Spybot which is itself an anti-spyware program which you presumably installed some time ago. You appear to be looking for an anti-anti-spyware program? :-)

Sorry for the humour but my feeling on all these programs is that they are actually the problem rather than the solution. You seem to be proving the point. For most people there is more danger in downloading random cleanup programs then there was from spyware in the first place.

BTW just because one of these programs says that you have x hundred problems that need resolving, it doesn't mean you actually have them. Flagging non-problems is how the developers persuade people to buy the program. That is why cookies are always highlighted even though they are always harmless.

greekman - 01 Feb 2008 08:01 - 6530 of 11003

Kayak,

Thanks but I know I have a registry that needs cleaning up. It might help my PC speed up a bit. I looked at teatime.exe and it did look as if it was OK but us technophobic have little if no patience with things we don't understand so thats why we sometimes panic a bit. (been in many hairy situations no prob, but sit me in front of a PC thats got problems that's different) If a screwdriver or hammer wont fix something I get stuck.

Alan,

Thanks will try it later.

Regards to both Greek.

Kayak - 01 Feb 2008 08:15 - 6531 of 11003

It is very unlikely that you have a registry that needs cleaning up. Cleaning up registries is not a normal thing to do. Even if there are 600 entries to remove, that would be out of a total of many thousands if not tens of thousands and so your system would be unlikely to run any faster.

The best way to get your system to run faster is to check that you have sufficient main memory and then look at all your installed software, particularly running software in the sidebar/system tray, and remove any that is not absolutely necessary. Dare I say it remove a few cleanup programs? :-)

greekman - 01 Feb 2008 08:41 - 6532 of 11003

Cheers Kayak,

I do have 4 items on the side bar, and you are the second poster to mention this could be a problem so will remove them to see if it helps.

greekman - 01 Feb 2008 09:12 - 6533 of 11003

Kayak, Optimist, Alan,

Side bar now gone and Regsofts used, definite increase in speed of laptop.

Kayak,

As said I'm technophobic so I could not see how switching my kettle off would help as it's in the kitchen 2 rooms away from my laptop. But that's what I tried first. Did not appear to make any difference, but thanks anyway.

Once again much obliged to all.

Kayak - 01 Feb 2008 09:17 - 6534 of 11003

:-)

brianboru - 02 Feb 2008 10:21 - 6535 of 11003



Can anyone explain why anyone would use Vista instead of XP SP2 ?

Spaceman - 02 Feb 2008 10:34 - 6536 of 11003

Brianboru,
because you bought a PC with it installed ?
because you have a company PC and they use Vista
becaue you like operating systems

other than that .....

I dont have it on any of my own PCs....

Kayak - 02 Feb 2008 10:46 - 6537 of 11003

Could anyone explain why anyone would use XP or Vista rather than Windows 2000? :-)

Stable, nearly identical and compatible to XP apart from visually, no copy protection...

Spaceman - 02 Feb 2008 10:59 - 6538 of 11003

K, and bloody expensive if you have to buy it ;-) well the ultimate version is ....

Optimist - 02 Feb 2008 11:06 - 6539 of 11003

Brianboru

I use Win 2K, XP and Vista

Although W2K is extremly stable, it no longer runs the latest programs not even IE7 or Office 2007.

XP is almost as stable but will run most modern programs.

Vista has many bells and whistles plus some things are easier and most editions include Media Centre if you want that. Future software will take advantage of some of it's more obscure features.

The most important thing IMO is that the better versions have the bitlocker system that enables the entire hard disk to be encrypted (this should be compulsory for goverment laptops). It also has many features that help IT admins in larger companies.

Optimist - 02 Feb 2008 11:08 - 6540 of 11003

S

Buy the OEM version which can be found at a reasonable price - you can't switch it to another machine though :(

Spaceman - 02 Feb 2008 11:17 - 6541 of 11003

O, I know but you only get either a 32 or 64 bit version not both and it still costs over 100.

And I am now moving away from using a single OS and trying to use portable apps, I use a iMac as my main home machine and I also have a couple of Intel PC running Ubuntu Linux, I keep my 2 year old Tosh laptop with XP for anything where I have to use MS.

I do use Vista on my work PC and its fine.

MightyMicro - 03 Feb 2008 13:58 - 6542 of 11003

Has Microsoft Disavowed Vista?
By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
2008-01-28


It seems that Microsoft is already giving up on Vista and is setting up business users to switch from XP to Windows 7.

Technically, Vista is pure misery. It eats system resources like an elephant does peanuts, Windows applications break and its so-called improved security is a joke. I know it. You know it. Even Microsoft's most devoted yes-men know it--although they won't admit it--and perhaps Microsoft knows it as well.

What else can explain why Microsoft is now leaking news about Windows 7, the next version of Windows? Oh, officially Vista SP 1 is still the big upcoming news, although I think most businesses are actually more interested in XP SP 3. The simple truth is that no matter how Microsoft and its partners like CDW spin it, Vista is not being picked up by corporate users. Even Bill Gates' vaunted 100 million Vista users number should be taken with a largevery largegrain of salt.

Most of the information is dripping out of the blog, Shipping Seven. But, it's more than just Shipping Seven, which may, or may not, be real. Microsoft is hard at work, harder than one would expect, with Vista just over a year old, in getting its next desktop operating system ready for action.

As Directions on Microsoft analyst Michael Cherry recently told eWEEK's Peter Galli, "I don't think Vista is as bad as Microsoft has convinced people it is." What should Microsoft do then? Cherry recommended that Microsoft "discuss the next version of the operating system, currently referred to as Windows 7, and what it will do."

Could Vista have missed its shot? Yes, yes, I know, how can I say this when there are tens of millions of copies of it out there? Easily. It's one thing to drop copies of Vista Home Basic and Premium on Best Buy customers who don't know any better. It's another thing entirely to get CIOs and IT managers to spendor should I say waste?billions on Vista.

For now, whether Microsoft likes it or not, XP, and not Vista, is the Windows those businesses will continue to use. And the companies that want to move on to a truly better operating system? They'll be moving to Linux or Mac OS.


eWeek Article

kernow - 03 Feb 2008 17:00 - 6543 of 11003

Seymour - post 6510
A bit belated - been on holiday but as I can't see a response - the answer I think is yes. On the web forwaring option of each domain name just enter the same link to the server holding your home page.

kernow - 03 Feb 2008 17:00 - 6544 of 11003

duplicate deleted
Register now or login to post to this thread.