goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Fred1new
- 27 Nov 2015 11:49
- 65437 of 81564
JB.
We have seen images of you mother before.
God knows what you father must have looked like.
No accounting for taste.
VICTIM
- 27 Nov 2015 11:56
- 65438 of 81564
Fred . Churches and Councils and people of public prominence in abuse inquiry BBC news
Fred1new
- 27 Nov 2015 11:57
- 65439 of 81564
Your point is?
VICTIM
- 27 Nov 2015 11:58
- 65440 of 81564
No morals .
jimmy b
- 27 Nov 2015 12:15
- 65441 of 81564
Maybe we should have him as Prime Minister he wouldn't stand for all the crap of hate preaching on the streets ..
VICTIM
- 27 Nov 2015 12:20
- 65442 of 81564
Funded by the UK taxpayer as well.
Fred1new
- 27 Nov 2015 12:20
- 65443 of 81564
Victim.
I think there are many who are amoral and others who have a fluctuating morality biasing to what is personally advantageous to themselves at the time.
Psychopaths, often are described being amoral, but often is different situations demonstrate morals or are "moralistic".
Again what is thought as moral fluctuate from period to another and become more libertine. Look at the changes in attitude or moral opinions of abortion since the change in the laws.
Look at moralistic denouncements on divorce and homosexual 50 years ago against the general acceptance.
For the majority nothing is fixed in stone.
-=-=
I think perhaps a more useful words and sometimes easier to define is "abuse", "abusive" and can be against oneself or others.
Abuse can be used to describe actions towards oneself or others.
etc.
-=-=-==-=
But in spite of failings I would prefer to live in most "societies" to-day, rather than
75years ago.
But "moral" codes are interesting!
cynic
- 27 Nov 2015 14:26
- 65444 of 81564
morals are set by the society one lives in and as such are a slow movable feast
Fred1new
- 27 Nov 2015 14:33
- 65445 of 81564
I see the problem!
cynic
- 27 Nov 2015 14:43
- 65446 of 81564
makes a change :-)
over time, it's actually no problem at all as what might have been taboo or acceptable centuries or even a couple of decades back, can become (un)acceptable as time passes ....... you can use (in uk) examples such as sunday shopping, capital punishment, children being sent up chimneys, assisted suicide and abortion
TANKER
- 27 Nov 2015 14:46
- 65447 of 81564
corbyn will get into bed with a racist but will not protect the public
the man is a wimp and would put up the white flag to any force
cynic
- 27 Nov 2015 14:56
- 65449 of 81564
i see nothing at all to indicate that it's a ukip poster
if it is, then ukip should sack its media company for it clearly doesn't understand the first thing about advertising
VICTIM
- 27 Nov 2015 14:59
- 65450 of 81564
Must be his own Cabinet .
cynic
- 27 Nov 2015 15:00
- 65451 of 81564
could be that or the conservatives or indeed the monster raving loony party
Haystack
- 27 Nov 2015 15:07
- 65452 of 81564
jimmy b
- 27 Nov 2015 15:08
- 65453 of 81564
Of course he would be a risk if he became Prime Minister ,a huge risk !!
He would hug a terrorist preferably one wearing a suicide belt !!!
MaxK
- 27 Nov 2015 15:15
- 65454 of 81564
Fred1new
- 27 Nov 2015 15:19
- 65455 of 81564
Jb,
Do you mean, hug a hoody?
Or perhaps, hung as a hoody?
Haystack
- 27 Nov 2015 15:19
- 65456 of 81564
Woah!