Crocodile
- 16 Dec 2002 03:59
tyketto
- 09 Mar 2008 00:41
- 6635 of 11003
Resusitating/installing an old computer and find that Zonealarm
"free" is no longer free.You have to pay for one of six items,non
of which I have any use for,which allows you the basic programme
for one computer for one year.
Does anybody know of an alternative?
Tks
mac
HARRYCAT
- 09 Mar 2008 10:51
- 6636 of 11003
ZoneAlarm is still free:
http://www.zonealarm.com/store/content/company/products/znalm/freeDownload.jsp
Click the "Basic firewall only" button on the right of the screen.
tyketto
- 09 Mar 2008 11:02
- 6637 of 11003
Thanks Harrycat.
Will try later.
mac
tyketto
- 09 Mar 2008 13:20
- 6638 of 11003
Running, after I installed SP4 for 2K.
Interestingly it does not recognise AVG.
Also, looking at my other computer, I
see that the AV status monitoring expired
after one year.
mac
HARRYCAT
- 09 Mar 2008 14:22
- 6639 of 11003
AVG is also still free, but there have been many updates & I wouldn't be surprised if old versions no longer run.
If you are running ZoneAlarm then you will probably need AVG as ZA has known conflicts with other Antivirus programs such as Avast.
http://free.grisoft.com/doc/5390/us/frt/0?prd=aff
tyketto
- 09 Mar 2008 23:33
- 6640 of 11003
True.
Had to uninstall old version and start
from scratch this time round.
(Refused to update the old one)
mac
maddoctor
- 11 Mar 2008 14:14
- 6641 of 11003
anybody got any comments on sp3 for xp and sp1 for vista?
ExecLine
- 11 Mar 2008 15:52
- 6642 of 11003
maddoctor
- 11 Mar 2008 16:04
- 6643 of 11003
execline , Ta , thats the sort of thing i was looking for. No reason to do anything at the mo
maddoctor
- 12 Mar 2008 12:03
- 6645 of 11003
Optimist , seem to be getting different information - saw flash somewhere last week that sp1 for vista had failed in b testing and microsoft were going for windows 7 instead???
maddoctor
- 12 Mar 2008 12:45
- 6647 of 11003
Optimist , thanks for comments. The reason i keep asking questions re Vista on this thread is because sometime this year i want to replace my powerful trading computer but all this confusion over Vista etc is delaying me acting.
Kyoto
- 12 Mar 2008 12:57
- 6648 of 11003
I'd gathered that Win7 was more fact than rumour - and the small kernel re-write has been dubbed 'MinWin'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7
As far as backward compatibility was concerned, I'd read that Microsoft was kicking around the idea of using virtualisation to run legacy Windows applications fairly seamlessly within Win7 which would allow Win7 to be a complete re-write without the inherent need to run legacy apps per se, and therefore compromise itself through supporting all the legacy security holes with it. In the linked article the MS guy mentions embedding hypervisors in Win7 - possibly for this purpose.
hangon
- 12 Mar 2008 13:11
- 6649 of 11003
Grief, not rebooting for a week ( by which I presume the computer crashed).
Vista was intended to be the OS that allowed folk to have media centres as well as business computing etc etc. unfortunately these applications are mutually exclusive - particularly as domestic-apps require quiet. This cannot be done with the current thinking, where PC have grown ever-more power hungry. The alternative hardware has yet to be developed - it needs a radically new outlook.
I see further development where Google is going - to make available smart applications which users can "borrow" On-Line, so there is no need to buy ever-expensive software. By interfacing through the internet the computing-power is in the server. This may reduce the power needed by computers. Hopfully PC cards will be developed to take streamed data and create a "cinema-experience" visually and in sound perhaps with interaction over their broadband connection.
Furthermore any domestic OS needs to stop being PC-like and far simpler than (say) a Video-recorder/VCR - which are notoriously poor at user-interface.
Vista confused the Market by having too many versions and this looks set to continue.
- If XP does what you require, it's far better to leave well alone and wait until the next OS is started. Being "first" with an OS is plain foolhardy - it is impossible to test all combinations of hardware/software, so conflicts are bound to happen. With computers as powerful as they are now, it is "probably" better to improve your periperals, rather than upgrading the core of the process. If the computing power shifts on-line, then what we have now will meet future needs, although better screens and speakers are likely to enhance our enjoyment.
ThePublisher
- 13 Mar 2008 09:34
- 6650 of 11003
Just been pointed to
this site.
Already installed a couple of the gizmos that will save me quite a bit of time/effort.
Worth a look for the less computerate of us mob - like 'moi'.
TP
hawick
- 15 Mar 2008 20:19
- 6653 of 11003
I've noticed recently that when my computer and laptop are both off my modem 100 mtr light has been blinking a fair bit (not as much as when online though). I'm sure it didn't used to, or only very occasionally.
Anything to be concerned about, and what might be causing it? Thanks