kitosdad
- 12 Dec 2007 16:20
The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.
Big Al
- 27 Feb 2009 10:46
- 6664 of 8631
LOL
tabasco
- 27 Feb 2009 10:48
- 6665 of 8631
Strange Dil.I was in it last week?
Do you know what bouncy.you have a personality the size of a gnats cockyour assumptions are about as accurate as a Scottish Striker.and your wit is as funny as Piper Alphaall in all you have the appeal of a skint Glaswegian hoodie on crack coccain asking for a light at two oclock in the morning on a derelict housing estateTake your Babyshame and Move on!
Big Al
- 27 Feb 2009 10:52
- 6666 of 8631
Come on Tabatha. Please explain the exact thought process you go through to do something as completely idiotic as punting 20% of your wealth in this? I see no logic to it, but I'm willing to learn.
;-0
tabasco
- 27 Feb 2009 11:03
- 6667 of 8631
Bouncy .you will never learnlook up the word charismaand then go to night schoolthats your starter for 10...when people start physically talking to you you will have officially made inroadsgive it twenty years and you may say something worthwhilebut thats in the balance?
Big Al
- 27 Feb 2009 11:40
- 6668 of 8631
ROFLMAO!!!
tabasco
- 27 Feb 2009 12:45
- 6669 of 8631
These traders get stuck into Banks time and time again.even bouncy realises 10 up 20 down aint good businessI cant believe it?.FFS you have to be brain dead to punt barc 31ml have so faram I missing something Dilyou are the professionalIm only semi-professional?
Dil
- 27 Feb 2009 12:49
- 6670 of 8631
Just a few billion brain cells , nothing you need worry about.
tabasco
- 27 Feb 2009 12:51
- 6671 of 8631
Needed or short?
tabasco
- 27 Feb 2009 12:59
- 6672 of 8631
Barc. are deadif you want to make a note of that Jeff.I am happy to state it categoricallyand have been calling it from 3-60 surely I cant be right againopps embarrassed Jeff....you aint invested are you dil?
Dil
- 27 Feb 2009 12:59
- 6673 of 8631
5 hours to go then party time in Wales tabby ... you coming ?
Gausie , Bullie and Martini came to the last one.
tabasco
- 27 Feb 2009 13:11
- 6674 of 8631
Although I would make your party a hell of a lot more fun judging by the guest listI too have a dinner party to go tospace cake included you do however have the sense not to invite bouncywould have killed it stone dead!best of luck with the Rugby.I couldnt give a sh*t either wayI do love the Frenchbut may the best team win
hilary
- 27 Feb 2009 13:30
- 6675 of 8631
Of course Barclays aren't dead. Don't be a silly Chilli.
They're one of the strongest banks out there. They haven't needed to, nor have they taken the same sort of risks as many of their peers because their asset base is that much stronger.
tabasco
- 27 Feb 2009 13:58
- 6676 of 8631
HilaryI do not have a punt long or short barcthey have refused government help and stated they will raise over 7bn from investment funds of Qatar and Abu Dhabijust to maintain bonuses me thinksthat will give middle east investors around a 1/3 stake the deal was said to be more costly than the governmentsBarclays which has so far snubbed any state aid has been dogged by fears that it will need to raise more funds or sell a stake to the Governmentit will happen I believethey are the least transparent British Bank and I ask myself whyyou pays your moneyyou takes your chanceit is most definitely the swerve for meremember I am usually lucky?
hilary
- 27 Feb 2009 14:21
- 6677 of 8631
Chilli,
I don't have a position in Barclays either, but my post was in response to your comment that they're dead. Sure they may well have exposure to toxic debt that hasn't been revealed just yet.
But they are not reliant upon the money markets for day to day liquidity in the same way as some of the smaller, aggressively expanding lenders were. They didn't need to be, simply because there is/was adequate cover there in the first place. They were therefore relatively unaffected when supply in the markets dried up.
So I don't really see why Middle Eastern money should be a problem. I would've thought it more likely that they'll use it pick up some cheap bargains when the market turns rather than need it for survival in the meantime.
Big Al
- 27 Feb 2009 14:25
- 6678 of 8631
Tabatha
It may seem amazing to you (highly likely actually), but my foray into banks last year was naturally stopped out. The bounce last month was well taken as was yesterday's early morning one. Net result to me personally was a gain that was 11.4x the loss suffered when stopped out.
Now I bet you wish you'd done the same thing instead of weeping into your Kleenex over MDX.
ROFLMAO!
As for you comments above on banks ....................... clown every time you attempt to show any understanding of how it all works. ;-))
tabasco
- 27 Feb 2009 14:47
- 6679 of 8631
Not been invited to the party then?
Big Al
- 27 Feb 2009 14:59
- 6680 of 8631
Different party, bugsy. LOL!
tabasco
- 27 Feb 2009 15:13
- 6681 of 8631
So it has taken you six months to tell me how you avoided a skinner on the Banksdoes it really take you that long to think of an answer?that is whats known in the trade as a wobblestarting to add up init bouncywobblyyou can see the comparisonand for your second wobble now its a different partywhats yours?The Teddy Bears
tabasco
- 27 Feb 2009 15:24
- 6682 of 8631
Hilaryyour on top of me and in a clinicbit worrying that?
Big Al
- 27 Feb 2009 15:37
- 6683 of 8631
Skinned you, numb nuts. LOL! You are so easy. No wonder it's light relief for many to turn up on here and get you going.
So tell us. What's your plan to recoup your losses here? We'd love to know. ;-))
Or are you still sticking to the "embezzlement" angle? Diddums!