bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
ptholden
- 29 Jun 2005 15:22
- 6707 of 27111
I was rather hoping from earlier posts that IIdiot had decided to stop bashing SEO and basically just f**ked off. Unfortunately, I can see from my filtered list that this is not actually the case. What a shame. But what's all this about getting our friends to prop up the SP by buying shares this morning? What a complete load of bollocks. I'm afraid this is desperation stakes for the IIdiot now. We have had the spin about the ASDA deal and no orders; well, that has and is happening. We have had the spin about the Interims being delayed; well, they are out. We have had the spin about the crash following the Interims; well, that hasn't happened. We've had spin on everything. What's left? Well, not very much actually. Give it up you loser, you never were very good at deramping this company and the more you post negatively as SEO progress, the more pathetic and stupid you look, if that is at all possible.
Have a nice day..........not
pth
proptrade
- 29 Jun 2005 15:32
- 6708 of 27111
II - staged buying doesn't exist. it is actually illegal to artificailly support a price in the open mkt. plse carry on spinning your lies it is making me laugh my head off!
maybe i am a friend of a friend because i have bought some. any more unsubstantiated comments?
bhunt1910
- 29 Jun 2005 15:42
- 6709 of 27111
Sorry - guys - we nearly got rid of him - and he baited you - and you swallowed it.
Just ignore him completely - parasites need something to feed off - do not give him the food and he will die.
Now pleeeeeeeeaase - lets just all of us ignore him - anyone joining this site will see what a complete arse he is and we can get on with discussing real issues - like who is going to organise the party.
Baza
insiderinside
- 29 Jun 2005 15:50
- 6710 of 27111
Let me add some comments I have on their status from a 3rd party -
"I haven't gone into the latest News and "goings-on" of SEO, but if they're trying to "pump up" the price, there's a good chance they want to buy something using their stock and not too much cash.
On the other hand, if their Equity is getting dangerously low and they're trying to avoid Insolvency, they'll need to sell more stock to the public or borrow from the banks. If you look at their latest Financials you'd see the following :-
Bottom Line Loss for 2004 was -2.790mil. This is up from a Loss in 2003 of -0.535mil. If you look at their Balance Sheet you will see that their Total Shareholder's Funds, i.e. Equity, for 2003 was 2.647mil. Now if they had added their 2004 Loss to that figure they would have had a Negative Equity, i.e. INSOLVENCY. However, during the 2004 Financial Year they were forced to improve their Equity situation so you will see that they added 5.209mil. to their Share account. I see they also included a "Shares to be issued" amount of 2.500mil. I wonder how "kosher" that is ?!
Either way, in my opinion, it doesn't say that much for SEO. If you sell your own stock to someone else you sell a certain amount of "ownership" of your company to a third party. I'd prefer to use the cash that my business plan generates, on an ongoing basis, to fund my purchases. What SEO may be doing tells me that they are not that good, at present, in making ongoing profits. They may see their future as being improved by incorporating another business into their existing structure. If that's the case, the question is, "how well will they do with that new structure ?" And once again, one will have to wait and see how that pans out by studying the future numbers in their Financial Reports. To make a move before one can analyse those future numbers is, by the very nature of things, SPECULATING."
roma
- 29 Jun 2005 15:56
- 6711 of 27111
As i said earlier, the Interims were not as bad as expected,and it takes time for all business products to build. The good thing about seo, is they have the products to build on. They are going the right way about it and, as the orders increase,the profits will follow, no-one in their right mind expected it to happen over night,wait for a few months and watch the sp increase as new orders are won. I am certainly not going to take any notice of any iidiot who advises off-loading a share with so much going for it. Some people would't know a good thing if it bit them in the arse.
bosley
- 29 Jun 2005 16:06
- 6712 of 27111
ii, thought you had some decorating to do? anway, it's very clear your argument is with pm1 and pm1 alone. why don't the two of you set up your own "special" thread, where you can call each other silly names and then the both of you can stop getting on other peoples' tits!
Sharesure
- 29 Jun 2005 17:56
- 6713 of 27111
My view is the interims were far less scary than I thought likely to be the case, other than T/O v Cap. Val.. With plenty of cash for the timebeing, and remember this company only has about 45 people on the payroll, I reckon it should be set up for the time it may take to get their order book flowing.
Agree with bos. re the private spats, it's boring for the rest of us.
Sequestor
- 29 Jun 2005 18:21
- 6714 of 27111
.
EWRobson
- 29 Jun 2005 22:52
- 6716 of 27111
Well done sequestor. Great picture of stockdog pulling the pants off to get at the insider inside! Suggest dynamite comes in right and gives him one at the same level with her handbag!
Been out of action with grandsons, golf, Billy Elliott, golf, education, golf, family from abroad, golf. Oh no! Over 500 posts to read, minus that is, 400 from ii. Plus a margin call to meet tomorrow - you guys have not been looking after the shop that well. Good interim report, though, in my view. Steady as she goes with renewed expectation of several hundred licences from ASDA suppliers. Now just contemplate the interim report for next year - lovely jubbly!
Eric
insiderinside
- 30 Jun 2005 00:33
- 6718 of 27111
So here was coment from a 3rd party on previous results and happenings - I will add comment on the latest results shortly for your information -
"I haven't gone into the latest News and "goings-on" of SEO, but if they're trying to "pump up" the price, there's a good chance they want to buy something using their stock and not too much cash.
On the other hand, if their Equity is getting dangerously low and they're trying to avoid Insolvency, they'll need to sell more stock to the public or borrow from the banks. If you look at their latest Financials you'd see the following :-
Bottom Line Loss for 2004 was -2.790mil. This is up from a Loss in 2003 of -0.535mil. If you look at their Balance Sheet you will see that their Total Shareholder's Funds, i.e. Equity, for 2003 was 2.647mil. Now if they had added their 2004 Loss to that figure they would have had a Negative Equity, i.e. INSOLVENCY. However, during the 2004 Financial Year they were forced to improve their Equity situation so you will see that they added 5.209mil. to their Share account. I see they also included a "Shares to be issued" amount of 2.500mil. I wonder how "kosher" that is ?!
Either way, in my opinion, it doesn't say that much for SEO. If you sell your own stock to someone else you sell a certain amount of "ownership" of your company to a third party. I'd prefer to use the cash that my business plan generates, on an ongoing basis, to fund my purchases. What SEO may be doing tells me that they are not that good, at present, in making ongoing profits. They may see their future as being improved by incorporating another business into their existing structure. If that's the case, the question is, "how well will they do with that new structure ?" And once again, one will have to wait and see how that pans out by studying the future numbers in their Financial Reports. To make a move before one can analyse those future numbers is, by the very nature of things, SPECULATING."
insiderinside
- 30 Jun 2005 00:42
- 6719 of 27111
Now then IMO the results statement is worded very openly which allows it to be misinterpreted (perfect material for rampers) if you notice the 24th March RNS it says 24 March 2005 Stanelco PLC, the RF (radio frequency) applications group, is pleased to announce that it has signed a binding contract with ASDA for a 12-month exclusive agreement for the application of the Group's GREENSEAL tray lidding and thermoforming RF technology in the UK and Ireland. ASDA anticipate that several hundred machines will be adapted to utilise the technology due to the significant benefits it delivers.
Now as they are reporting on the first half year they have cleverly IMO in the results added the word "following" and then made reference to this statement again 29 June 2005 following successful trials, on the 24th March 2005, Stanelco announced that it has signed a binding contract with ASDA for a 12-month exclusive agreement for the application of the group's GREENSEAL(TM)tray lidding and thermoforming RF technology in the UK and Ireland. ASDA anticipate that several hundred machines will be adapted in the next 12 months to utilise the technology due to the significant benefits it delivers.
The following refers to previous news and anticipate is a forward looking word with no meaning or commitment - very misleading IMO ! You can see already certain rampers using this loose wording to start ramping again.
For the record IN the event that there is not in place several hundred orders in the first year which has 11 months more to go now after the 1st commercial order (yes the 1 of 2 they have) then I shall be writing to the Chairman of Asda direct to complain over why their lower levels of management have allowed the use of Asdas name in such circumstances.
It is enough to make you LOL the play on words going on IMO.
forest
- 30 Jun 2005 00:54
- 6720 of 27111
This is catching, why
aldwickk
- 30 Jun 2005 07:48
- 6721 of 27111
What did Share maq say today ?
bhunt1910
- 30 Jun 2005 07:52
- 6722 of 27111
Welcome back Eric - missed your commentaries
Baza
RD
- 30 Jun 2005 07:55
- 6723 of 27111
From Shares mag today:
Stanelco (SEO)
Stanelco is valued at 225 million high
expectations for a company that made sales of
only 1.3 million and lost 770,000 last year.
Shares have rocketed because of its Greenseal
packaging technology. UK supermarket chain
ASDA is very impressed after trialling
Greenseal and it has recommended it to all its
suppliers. Last week, Hitchen Foods became
the second supplier to order the 50,000 per
machine conversion kit. Stanelco collects
royalties of some 30,000 per machine per year.
Broker Evolution expects Stanelco to win
massive orders in the US as ASDAs parent
company Wal-Mart is taking a keen interest.
Stanelco can also make sealing out of
biodegradeable plastics, which could be a big
revenue source if the oil price keeps on soaring.
Evolution forecasts 1.2 million losses this year
but nearly 12 million profit in 2006. Profits
could treble in 2007. This is why the shares
could still be cheap if Stanelco fulfils its
promise of becoming the next Tetrapak. (TD)
bosley
- 30 Jun 2005 08:02
- 6724 of 27111
morning all. i echo baza. welcome back , eric. nomine ipso recreor. good follow up in shares mag, keeps seo on the radar.
hewittalan6
- 30 Jun 2005 08:09
- 6725 of 27111
Wow. Latin. Is you a gentleman bos and use that because its nobilies obligay or are you just a sensa nobilis????
Alanus
Sequestor
- 30 Jun 2005 08:16
- 6726 of 27111
Stanelco in sharus papyrus est,sharus libra mortus est.
per ardua ad Asda