Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Fred1new - 14 Feb 2016 18:15 - 67784 of 81564

Here is another interesting article (for some) :

Britain’s future in Europe lies in the hands of the Labour party
Andrew Rawnsley


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/14/eu-referendum-labour-tories


David Cameron faces the most severe challenge of his career and only Labour can solve it for him. The campaign to keep Britain in the EU can be won only if enough Labour supporters cast a ballot to stay in.

This under-appreciated twist in the referendum plot puts the prime minister in the deliciously ironic position of looking to Labour to save him from the wishes of much of his own party. It also places a momentous burden of responsibility on Labour. In normal times, what the opposition says usually makes a marginal contribution to the destiny of the nation. In the extraordinary circumstances of the referendum, the future of the United Kingdom and its place in the world is in the hands of Labour and its supporters to a degree few have fully appreciated.

Fred1new - 14 Feb 2016 18:15 - 67785 of 81564

Here is another interesting article (for some) :

Britain’s future in Europe lies in the hands of the Labour party
Andrew Rawnsley


http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/14/eu-referendum-labour-tories


David Cameron faces the most severe challenge of his career and only Labour can solve it for him. The campaign to keep Britain in the EU can be won only if enough Labour supporters cast a ballot to stay in.

This under-appreciated twist in the referendum plot puts the prime minister in the deliciously ironic position of looking to Labour to save him from the wishes of much of his own party. It also places a momentous burden of responsibility on Labour. In normal times, what the opposition says usually makes a marginal contribution to the destiny of the nation. In the extraordinary circumstances of the referendum, the future of the United Kingdom and its place in the world is in the hands of Labour and its supporters to a degree few have fully appreciated.

MaxK - 14 Feb 2016 18:44 - 67786 of 81564

Britain can enjoy the good life after Brexit

The case for leaving the EU is getting stronger every day, and now we must show what Brexit looks like




By David Campbell Bannerman

10:48AM GMT 10 Feb 2016



Now that the draft EU "deal" has been revealed the choice for the British people is crystallising. Remain will mean an unreformed EU free to steamroller forward its plans for an EU Army, common welfare and pensions, harmonised taxes and all the other trappings of a superstate. We will have a single European country.



The supposed triumphant "deal" will not make the slightest practical difference, nor is it legally enforceable or irreversible. So the deal is no more than an IOU, and addresses none of the key issues.


The other option is Leave - meaning the UK secures a trade deal with the EU which allows it to escape the political chains of the fast approaching EU Superstate and to take back control of our country. Leave means leaving the EU, not Europe, and staying in the international community – we would not exit the Council of Europe, UN, G8, NATO, IMF, Commonwealth or many other international bodies.


The Remain campaign is entirely negative. Yes, such "Project Fear" worked in Scotland - I was there from Inverness to Glasgow - because it was real.


The Remain campaign is entirely negative. Yes, such "Project Fear" worked in Scotland - I was there from Inverness to Glasgow - because it was real.


But the scaremongering wont work for Brexit and the UK, because the reality is that up to five million EU jobs depend on access to the UK market, with an annual UK deficit in goods with the EU larger than some economies - a staggering £56billion. The UK is the EU's single largest trading partner and fifth largest world economy.



More: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12148307/Britain-can-enjoy-the-good-life-after-Brexit.html

Haystack - 14 Feb 2016 19:19 - 67787 of 81564

You have to realise that the stay in campaign has not started and won't until Cameron's discussions have finished. That makes the polls likely to be wrong at the moment. It may appear that the exit side are ahead, but that is a temporary thing.

Stan - 14 Feb 2016 19:23 - 67788 of 81564

Another belter from poor boy H/S. "Like all unions, they dislike change."

.. it's laugh a minute on here with some of you "Con" artist voters these days it really is.

MaxK - 14 Feb 2016 19:53 - 67789 of 81564

The stay in campaign has never stopped.

As for dave's negotiations, they never started in reality, just a series of play acting sketches with the goon squad.

You must think people cant see what a prat he is making of himself, and by extension, the rest of us.

Haystack - 14 Feb 2016 20:06 - 67790 of 81564

Unions have always been failed luddites.

Haystack - 14 Feb 2016 20:08 - 67791 of 81564

It looks like June 23 for the referendum.

I will probably vote out, but think we will stay in. My reasons are different from the mainstream arguments.

Stan - 14 Feb 2016 22:06 - 67792 of 81564

The "Con" artists are the failures among other things.. but there again we know that.

Haystack - 14 Feb 2016 22:32 - 67793 of 81564

It is instructive to see how socialism has failed everywhere. Capitalism survives because it is Infinitely modifiable. In this country every Labour government has ended in a crisis. Take France and Venezuela. Socialism has failed there dismally and Hollande is the most disliked leader there ever. Venezuela is a more extreme version at the catastrophic end of the scale with astronomic inflation and shortages of everything.

Stan - 14 Feb 2016 22:47 - 67794 of 81564

"The "Con" artists are the failures among other things.. but there again we know that."

Thank you for agreeing with me H/S

Typical tactics, not big enough to admit to being wrong again.. just tries to change the subject.

Haystack - 14 Feb 2016 22:55 - 67795 of 81564

The Conservatives have been very successful. Just look at Thatcher. She was brilliant. Crushing Scargill and his ilk was just one of her triumphs.

Stan - 14 Feb 2016 23:25 - 67796 of 81564

Nighty night then.

Haystack - 15 Feb 2016 00:51 - 67797 of 81564

Now there is a failure in the making.

Stan - 15 Feb 2016 06:54 - 67798 of 81564

Haystack - 15 Feb 2016 00:51 - 67798 of 67798

Now there is a failure in the making.

.. Yes I think you probably are.

cynic - 15 Feb 2016 07:57 - 67799 of 81564

67783 - if the (any) gov't wants to decide what doctors should be paid and under what contract terms they should work, then it should take on board (which it clearly hasn't) that doctors have no obligation to accept these terms and can and will and are voting with their feet

Haystack - 15 Feb 2016 10:48 - 67800 of 81564

Only a very few are leaving the NHS. If they feel underpaid then that is what they should do. Striking should not be an option.

iturama - 15 Feb 2016 10:54 - 67801 of 81564

Free movement of labour is not a bad thing. I have practiced it all my life. In reality, it is quite easy when you are young and unattached. Less easy when you have a family, schooling, partner's job, to consider.
It is the right of the government to decide what it can afford in government owned businesses. And I don't really buy the 7 year training complaint. That's similar to EU employers demanding more because they have a second language when in most cases their mother tongue, if not english, is of little relevance internationally.
All graduates go through a junior phase of several years before they become really useful to their employer and often they are poached by other companies thereafter.
That's life.

Fred1new - 15 Feb 2016 11:15 - 67802 of 81564

Fred1new - 15 Feb 2016 11:15 - 67803 of 81564

.
Register now or login to post to this thread.