Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

cynic - 23 Feb 2016 12:16 - 68186 of 81564

that as may be, but certainly the gang culture (for workers!) offends - but then so do gypsy encampments even more!

jimmy b - 23 Feb 2016 12:19 - 68187 of 81564

How many more East Europeans would you like to take in then Hays ? can the UK take a population of 80 million or 90 million ?

Or am i being a rabble rouser ?

iturama - 23 Feb 2016 12:41 - 68188 of 81564

The easiest option to save the euro project is for Germany to exit. The rest may have a chance of competing thereafter. Germany has a cheap currency and now lots of cheap labour.

cynic - 23 Feb 2016 12:45 - 68189 of 81564

***** is seeking to end the population’s dependence on government handouts.

sounds almost like uk doesn't it :-)

a fairly easy quiz Q
what country is the above?

MaxK - 23 Feb 2016 12:55 - 68190 of 81564

What Brexit would look like for Britain

Dan Hannan


‘So what’s your alternative?’ demand Euro-enthusiasts. ‘D’you want Britain to be like Norway? Or like Switzerland? Making cuckoo clocks? Is that what you want? Is it? Eh?’



Full story and a few eye opening factoids:

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/02/what-britain-would-look-like-after-brexit/

cynic - 23 Feb 2016 13:02 - 68191 of 81564

a very interesting article, though its bias is obvious

iturama - 23 Feb 2016 13:13 - 68192 of 81564

Well Hannan, like Farage, has seen the EU from the inside. Must be worth something. The more shrill the voices of doom become about leaving, the more certain I am that they are wrong.

Haystack - 23 Feb 2016 13:21 - 68193 of 81564

Our population is estimated to increase to 70 million over the next 12 years. We are growing in population slower than most countries and we take the least immigrants. UKIP has done a good job in making immigration a worry for people. And UKIP is very similar to the BNP and attracts similar supporters. Immigration is not such a problem as is made out. The real problem is the lack of infrastructure to support our population. UKIP only gained any serious following when the last recession began. In times of economic difficulty, parties at the extreme fringes start to do well. They appeal to people's fears and basic instincts.

jimmy b - 23 Feb 2016 13:24 - 68194 of 81564

How do you know our population is set to increase to 70 million in the next 12 years , nobody can estimate that with the doors open to 500 million people .

I take it your voting to stay then Hays ?

Haystack - 23 Feb 2016 13:27 - 68195 of 81564

A factor in people wishing to leave the EU is the belief that laws are passed that affect us where we have no sovereign right to challenge them.

That could be an important thing. However, it seems that no one can thing of any examples.

Is there anyone here who has been affected in their day to day life by an EU law that is anyway onerous?

Haystack - 23 Feb 2016 13:33 - 68196 of 81564

Jimmy
No, I am voting out for different reasons.

The estimate of 70m is from the ONS. Farage gave massive estimates of people who would come here from Romania etc and he was completely wrong. Knowing the total numbers in the EU doesn't tell you how many will actually come.

Fred1new - 23 Feb 2016 13:38 - 68197 of 81564

Hays has asked Lynton, who told him the best chance is with;

VICTIM - 23 Feb 2016 14:11 - 68198 of 81564

cynic is it France.

iturama - 23 Feb 2016 15:00 - 68199 of 81564

I could think of a number of countries. The oil rich, like Saudi, that have to cut due to the low oil price. Ditto Venezuela which is a train wreck under the Chavistas. Equally the USA under Obama with his food stamps program. But he thinks he has a bottomless pit to draw from.

cynic - 23 Feb 2016 15:25 - 68200 of 81564

no V ..... actually it's Saudi

VICTIM - 23 Feb 2016 15:28 - 68201 of 81564

Well it's their own fault .

cynic - 23 Feb 2016 15:30 - 68202 of 81564

68196 - eu legislation is often insidious .....

there is the plain stupid like dictating what apples can be grown commercially to limiting the number of hours that can be worked (48 hours includes travel time) to delaying for years making lorry cabs safer insofar as seeing cyclists is concerned

from the outside, one can pick and choose and adopt the bits of legislation that look sensible while rejecting the plain interfering and junk

Haystack - 23 Feb 2016 15:33 - 68203 of 81564

Saudi and Russia have agreed to cut production to help raise prices.

It won't work because as the price rises then the shale oil that is loss making at present will come back on stream an cause over supply again.

Then add to that Iran beginning to pump again.

We are in for losing oil prices for the foreseeable future. Good for some developed countries and very bad for lots of others such as Saudi, Russia, Venezuela, Nigeria etc.

VICTIM - 23 Feb 2016 15:40 - 68204 of 81564

Saudi and Russia are freezing production .

Haystack - 23 Feb 2016 15:42 - 68205 of 81564

I see this as the biggest problem on the long term horizon. We are heading for a mass low wage low skill future. The first phase will be lower wages for unskilled jobs. Next it will be no wages because of few jobs. Long term it will be high wages for a few highly skilled jobs and no work for the masses. I have had this conversation on here before.

http://news.sky.com/story/1646966/earn-less-than-20-robots-could-replace-you

The White House says that if you earn less than $20 (£14) per hour, you'll probably be replaced by a robot.

The Council of Economic Advisors (CEA) came to the conclusion in its economic report for 2016.

It said that worldwide shipments of industrial robotics doubled between 2010 and 2014.

This surge in automation could put workers in non-supervisory roles that make less than $20 per hour out of work.
Register now or login to post to this thread.