for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

Proud you ain't kidding I just updated my profile as well.

the tick ups probably are probably from buying by holders who got their glossy small ( but perfectly formed) brochure with the results today- it won`t last

seq
You haven't got a little house by your name?

nah, I am much too modest to have a web-site, ` sides I am a techno-prat anyway,too lazy to learn

lol

Just checking if I've got a monkey icon against my name...nahhh...better eat some more bananas!!!

seq
Did you say prat!!! oh sorry techno prat.

I am honest enough and mature enough to admit to being a prat at times too driver, like when I bgt. this dog , still I am short the bitch now, we`ll see

lol

g`luck

Hi Seq - going short on SEO - that is a brave move.

I am hoping that it has bottomed now and reached a "support" level. - hope I am using the right terminology.

Then again - I have been horribly wrong in the past.

Baza

Seq

If you're short it's bound to go up!!

pth

Any one else having problems with accessing the Trades from the watch list ?

Baza

Any icons by my name?

Naa,
I feel neglected...

IC article today says as we all know that all the good news for 2006 is already in the price - notes that Hardman have now downgraded their estimates and show a big loss at prelims in 2006 as they believe SE0 cannot get enough orders by October 31st to avoid prelim loss.

For those who want to see Hardmans latest update on SE0 please see the link below - they try to remain positive - they have too as they were so very positive before - but the negative side is creeping in - I would expect the next update to be again less positive and more negative - as is the trend with EVO too - from buy to add to hold soon and then IMO all will say sell - no orders - lots of talk - no big orders.

http://www.hardmanandco.com/Research/Stanelco_june05.pdf

I thought we got rid of him (didn't know how to negotiate the site)

It does say - (in regards to the restated estimates); "This is a timing difference, not a change in our long term expectations for the product."

Does ii read the stuff he post on here, that link from Hardmans is very positive if I wasn't in SEO I would be after that report.

well worth a look at hardmans link. also , considering the luck and bad timing of seqs trades in seo , i feel much better now he is short.........:)

oh driver, i did the link with out your help...... starting to get the hang of this pc nonsense, slowly but surely

I've had ii squelched (strangled) for a long time, but the new bb revived him/it. I noticed he goes on and on about the patent. Now, seriously, what happens if it turns out a patent for Greenseal cannot be granted? (Or, is it another ii lie that there is no patent????)

ii is now squelched again, so ii; you don't need to comment for my sake.

according to the hardman report that ii very kindly linked us to , it talks about jvs with other companies regarding what seo would do with biotec. i think it ties up nicely with this bit , borrowed from gf's carclo thread (hope he doesn't mind!)

"The development of water soluble capsules for drug delivery is ongoing with our
partner, Stanelco plc. We are concentrating on increasing the starch content of
the capsules to allow us both to reduce cost and, more importantly, to
facilitate the process of regulatory approval. We are in the process of
presenting the capsule technology to a number of drug development companies"

if memory serves,the dispute with bprg was about the welding of polymers . starch isn't a polymer so ingel could be back on track. or have i missed something?