cashcaptain
- 09 May 2007 13:23
ANYONE KNOW WHY THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND IS SHOWING A SHARE PRICE AROUND THE 6.59 MARK WHEN IT WAS 18.00 OR SO THE OTHER WEEK OR AM I GOING STRANGE?????????????
halifax
- 18 Apr 2008 15:59
- 69 of 676
Yes have a rights issue good excuse to reduce the dividend.
mitzy
- 18 Apr 2008 16:06
- 70 of 676
I guess it will be a 2/5 issue at 280p raising 10b .
spitfire43
- 18 Apr 2008 16:11
- 71 of 676
I read earlier a figure of 275 to raise 10bn, so would expect sp to drift lower to low 3.00s
halifax
- 18 Apr 2008 16:12
- 72 of 676
Anybodys gess we should run a book.....1 for 3 @ 3.30 !
cynic
- 18 Apr 2008 16:12
- 73 of 676
not necessarily so at all ..... others may perceive it as a way of picking up cheap stock, especially if market sentiment is positive
spitfire43
- 18 Apr 2008 16:16
- 74 of 676
Picking up cheap stock. That is exactly how I would see it, so the low 3.00 figure could be what I would like to see. But would still expect to see this unless whole market remains bullish.
halifax
- 18 Apr 2008 16:17
- 75 of 676
Pretty expensive way to raise capital with RBS shares yielding 9% unless you reduce the dividend subsquently.
Guscavalier
- 18 Apr 2008 16:20
- 76 of 676
and this may be the time Sovereign Wealth Funds take stakes an look to take a longer view ?
halifax
- 18 Apr 2008 16:37
- 77 of 676
May prove difficult to get a rights issue away in volatile markets, in normal conditions it would not need to be underwitten... perhaps an opportunity to earn some fat fees?
spitfire43
- 18 Apr 2008 18:24
- 78 of 676
I'm impressed Halifax theres more to you than meets the eye, surely you wouldn't underwrite the whole lot, must spread some of the risk............lol
halifax
- 18 Apr 2008 21:25
- 79 of 676
No I'll leave it to Goldman and Merrill they need the money more than I do in these hard times!!
hlyeo98
- 19 Apr 2008 21:49
- 80 of 676
The 6 billion write-off that RBS will announce from its continuing exposure to the sub-prime meltdown in America is bigger than expected, as is the rights issue
mitzy
- 19 Apr 2008 22:12
- 81 of 676
Some press reports suggest a write-down of 10b and a rights issue of 15b and the sale of Direct Line and Churchill for 4b and the cancellation or reduction of the dividend..
When did it all go wrong..?
greekman
- 20 Apr 2008 11:05
- 82 of 676
But can we believe anything that is said, as RBS stated after the last write down that there would be no more hidden exposure to the sub prime market surfacing. At the time many of us stated that we were skeptical that the whole truth was out.
I personally don't think they have anything further hidden, as to come to the market again after this proposed issue would destroy any belief/confidence left.
spitfire43
- 20 Apr 2008 11:27
- 83 of 676
I remember in February that most people here were indeed skeptical to the true extent of writedown then, and expected more to come. RBS must use this week to clear the decks with writedowns, and have large enough rights issue, to ensure they don't have to come back to the shareholders. I wonder if as recently as February, RBS like most banks may not have had a clear picture of the amounts of risk they were holding, ABN Ambro had higher exposure to sub prime debts, than most European Banks.
Watch now as other banks scramble to follow RBS, re writedowns and rights issues.
greekman
- 21 Apr 2008 09:10
- 84 of 676
Someone on another site posted that the heads of managements at banks/building societies should have been more aware and should take cuts in salaries/bonuses.
The post was rubbished soon after. It was rubbished with the reasons given that most banks hardly realized there was sub prime in the deals they were buying, due to the way they were packaged and sold off to unsuspecting banks.
Whatever happened to Due Diligence. If you were intending to buy a company and went to these banks for a loan they would question what steps you had taken to investigate the companies profits/loss, debt, cash flow, potential etc, almost the third degree as I know to my own experience.
Whilst appreciating that the buying of a business to purchasing packaged loans is not an exact parallel, the banks that took on these financial loan packages (on reading many sub prime articles) carried out about as many checks as most punters carry out buying knocked off CD's at a car boot sale.
Some institutions that bought these packages now admit their checks were somewhat lax, whilst many experts (yes I know hindsight is a great thing) have stated that many bought with almost no checks, IE bought almost as seen.
The truth is probably somewhere in between.
They took on these packaged loans, because they were obviously priced at such an on the surface bargain that greed and not prudence was the order of the day. Many then re-sold on, probably still not full aware of their true value.
So yes I fully agree with the statement that the salaries and bonuses should be cut, but don't limit this to RBS. All such Dell Boy dealings should have been seen for what they were. We are talking about top so called financial experts here, who like those markets of old, 'OK son you have just bought a bargain, now don't open the box till you get home'.
mitzy
- 21 Apr 2008 12:36
- 85 of 676
Telegraph says a RI at 1for 2 @250p.
halifax
- 21 Apr 2008 13:07
- 86 of 676
Surely that will crush their sp?
cynic
- 21 Apr 2008 13:11
- 87 of 676
not necessarily ..... though it will of course be dilutory, the market may well perceive (and that is the important factor) that the end of the world is not imminent and that this presents a good opportunity to pick up cheap stock
dealerdear
- 21 Apr 2008 13:35
- 88 of 676
IMO I don't think people have a clue what they are going to say.
There is an awful lot of speculation in the papers but very little fact.
A rights issue, probably, as for the divi, who knows.