goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
Haystack
- 06 Apr 2016 20:05
- 69715 of 81564
Cameron's dad wouldn't owe anything as it is legal.
Stan
- 06 Apr 2016 20:12
- 69716 of 81564
Alf throws his toys out the pram alert!
Also Cameron still digging his hole deeper and deeper.. which is great to witness by all.
Haystack
- 06 Apr 2016 20:21
- 69717 of 81564
It will be forgotten soon.
Stan
- 06 Apr 2016 21:22
- 69718 of 81564
You wish.
Fred1new
- 06 Apr 2016 21:37
- 69719 of 81564
I hope pay-back time is at the next G.E. not the referendum vote!
will10
- 06 Apr 2016 21:52
- 69720 of 81564
Hays
We will only know how legal Cameron senior's overseas ventures were if we get an open investigation. Evidence so far queries whether it was a legit off shore company. Looks like UK directors controlled it and overseas directors had no control. Dave boy promised to shut down tax dodging via off shore setups. But as with most of the shit that comes put of mouth he did nothing. Mind you Labour did nothing under their watch. Any wonder we're pissed off with politics.
Stan
- 06 Apr 2016 22:10
- 69721 of 81564
If you "Con"artist voters are so "pissed off" as you put it with politics, then why the hell do you keep on voting for them?
Chris Carson
- 06 Apr 2016 22:14
- 69722 of 81564
The alternative was to vote for a gobshite who stabbed his brother in the back!
Neither Cameron nor I doubt Corbyn will be candidates in 2020.
Stan
- 06 Apr 2016 22:26
- 69723 of 81564
"The alternative was to vote for a gobshite who stabbed his brother in the back!"
No it wasn't and you know it, Where does it say that you can only vote for two candidates at a general election then? the only time that has to happen is if there are only two standing.
Chris Carson
- 06 Apr 2016 22:41
- 69724 of 81564
Rubbish Stanley! Surely the criteria is to vote for the candidate and Party who you consider to be the best for the country and electorate at the time. It wouldn't matter to you and Fred if Popeye The Sailor Man was standing for Labour you would vote for him. Jezza what a joke, I rest my case.
Stan
- 06 Apr 2016 22:46
- 69725 of 81564
What case you don't have one, your making wrong assumptions CC.. and if anyone's talking rubbish it certainly isn't me.
will10
- 06 Apr 2016 22:47
- 69726 of 81564
Stan
Neither labour nor Tory make any effort to close the wide open loop holes. One's as bad as the other. Why didn't Gordon Brown make an effort to do something. Even though Dave boy said he would act I'm not surprised the lying bastard did nowt. But Labour had the opportunity with Blair and Brown and sat on their arses. Politicians all talk shit.
Chris Carson
- 06 Apr 2016 22:47
- 69727 of 81564
You seem to have a lot of practice Stan!
Stan
- 06 Apr 2016 22:54
- 69728 of 81564
Pot and kettle CC.. and not for the first time.
Again Will, what on earth possess you to think that you can only vote for two candidates?
Stan
- 06 Apr 2016 23:01
- 69729 of 81564
Right I haven't got time to bandy words with the likes of you lot, I'm off to get some shut eye.. night plebs -):
will10
- 06 Apr 2016 23:11
- 69730 of 81564
Stan
I vote locally. Our mp not high up pecking order. If the sitting man has done reasonable job he gets my vote. If not I vote for whoever has best chance of kicking him out. No loyalty to any party.
TANKER
- 07 Apr 2016 07:42
- 69731 of 81564
David Cameron intervened personally to prevent offshore trusts from being dragged into an EU-wide crackdown on tax avoidance, it has emerged.
In a letter to the then president of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy, in 2013, the prime minister said that trusts should not automatically be subject to the same transparency requirements as companies.
The EU planned to shine a light on the dealings of offshore bodies by publishing a central register of their ultimate owners; but in a letter unearthed by the Financial Times that remains publicly available on the government’s website, Cameron said: “It is clearly important we recognise the important differences between companies and trusts.”
He continued: “This means that the solution for addressing the potential misuse of companies - such as central public registries - may well not be appropriate generally.”
The prime minister’s personal involvement in the EU-wide debate emerged as he continued to face questions about his family’s connections to Blairmore Holdings Inc, the offshore trust set up by his late father, the existence of which was revealed in leaked papers from the database of Panama-based law firm Mossack Fonseca.
The prime minister’s spokeswoman said that Downing Street had responded to allegations about Ian Cameron in the past.
When asked earlier if there was still any family money invested in the fund, a Downing Street spokeswoman had said: “That is a private matter.” But subsequently No 10 has issued a series of clarificatory statements.
TANKER
- 07 Apr 2016 07:43
- 69732 of 81564
Cameron must go he is tainted with fraud the man is a bloody liar
TANKER
- 07 Apr 2016 07:46
- 69733 of 81564
he as given the party a dirty name .now is leaflet on the EU is full of lies lies lies
spending my taxes on lies that money should be spent on services the man is a horrible disgusting liar
TANKER
- 07 Apr 2016 07:47
- 69734 of 81564
I am going to knock doors and collect the leaflets and post them back to the pm
to wipe the shit of is face