I often find all manner of reference to Technical Analysis whilst reading threads, questioning certain elements, asking for advice on indicators and also requesting advice on a stock and whether it's a good time to buy, sell, hold or remain indifferent. I am the first to admit that my own TA is still in its infancy, but I do spend time on expanding my knowledge (hopefully in the right direction!).

Rather than having to ask a TA question on a particular thread, perhaps this thread could be used as a forum for TA queries and become a knowledge base. Just a thought, if there is little or no interest, the thread will sink without trace and that will be the end of that. I will personally add a few snippets to help those with less knowledge (if that's possible) to keep things rolling. There is a danger that the thread will receive countless requests for opinions on a variety of stocks and there is only so much I can do alone, therefore I would more than welcome input from other posters, no matter how rudimentary they believe their own knowledge to be, hopefully some real experts will take the time to contribute.

It's worth understanding at least the basics David. If you're disciplined it can certainly help with timing buys and sells, although not always totally accurate, definetly worth the effort to learn.

Good thread PT.

Strawbs.

Agreed

i shall have to re-read PT's detailed example several times to understand full what he is saying ...... no bets that my one remaining grey cell will be able to absorb that much info even then! .....

however, if we use my own pathetically basic analysis of TAN (see chart below), i had reached a similar conclusion, but for slightly difefrent reasons

i reckoned that 200 would prove to be a psychological barrier, as round numbers often are, especially if the market was stopping for a breather or even a correction ...... this has proved to be the case, though you would need to look at the intra-day trading to see that 200 has been nudged several times, but not really broken.

looking for retrenchment, the 25 dma is currently at about 175, though still rising strongly, with the 50 dma not far behind at about 160 and running almost parallel (as it happens) ...... either/both these levels are likely to give support.

the above TAN chart was over the last 3 months, merely to make it easier to read ..... below is the 1 year chart, and to me, the interesting thing is that the 25 dma has given consistent support ....... therefore, at least from my own trading perspective, there looks to be little scope for finessing this stock, especially as even in today's soggy market (carrying on from late yesterday), sp has remained pretty solid ..... in conclusion, i shall stay put

Excellent, as ever PT. Thanks.

cracking work guys, makes for interesting reading, have been interested in TA for a while, but confess i do need to put more effort into understanding the correct signals, as hindsight has always been the only (worst) guide

if we now look at DOO (another of my fave shares!), i think PT will agree that TA does not work here, or at least not for the time being ...... the reason being that there has been news of a very important JV with BP which has had an obvious and dramatic impact on sp ....... see 1 year chart below.

my conclusion on this stock would be NOT to buy at current levels as there is potential for sp to fall about 30p before even hitting support on 25 dma ...... imo, this could easily happen if the market starts to catch fright on the back of Wall Street.

however, my own view is that the fall on Wall Street last night was (typically!) overdone and that Bernanke was implying that inflation did not look too serious and that therefore interest rates would not need to be raised .... in fact, having closed my long Dow yesterday afternoon (reasonable profit), i have just re-opened same 70 points lower

Sorry to bang on about RSI and the misguided belief it is an overbought / oversold indicator but DOO offer another excellent example. Note that when the RSI hit 80, some would have been yelling SELL, overbought and yes it did fall back to 70 but then the SP carried on going up. What the RSI didn't do was make a failure swing, ie, dip below the previous high. One to keep an eye on now, because it may well do so soon, look for the RSI turning down and if it dips below 70, it theoretically posts a confirmed SELL signal.

The problem with these near vertical moves is determining a trend line and where support lies. I'll post a chart in a while looking at speedlines and fib retracement levels which may offer a clue.

pth

PT .... like all good brokers, you say sell when you mean buy and vice versa! ...... oversold when rsi hit 80? ...... don't think so lol! .... anyway, there are very specific factors driving DOO at the moment, which is why i said TA did/does not work here at least pro tem .... interestingly, sp seems to be getting another head of steam - +15p this afternoon

oops edited now :)

Richard re TAN, yes we did come to the same conclusion using different indicators, which when used together further strengthen any TA and therefore the decision process. My thoughts were that a correction / retracement was due, as were your own and we both arrive at support in the region of 175p. Isn't the world a lovely place when we all agree, although my next post disagrees with your thoughts on DOO :)

we did not actually disagree for i said i would NOT buy at the current level ..... in fact, since posting that, sp has bolted a further 20p ...... given that sp has been quite static for the last week or so and wonder if there is any good reason for the new surge.

rsi must eventually correct itself, but if i read you correctly, the upward trend is still maintained provided that rsi does not fall below 70 or thereabouts ...... conversely, i guess your "logic" also implies that if rsi now rises above about 85, then a new buy signal is triggered ...... hmm! that sounds a bit brave to me, so may have misinterpreted

The point on which I disagree is that DOO is affected by special factors (BP) and therefore conventional TA does not or cannot apply. The TA argument goes along the lines of:

1. Market action discounts everything
2. Prices moves in trends
3. History repeats itself

(From JJ Murphy Technical Analysis of the Financial Markets)

Number 1 discounts BP.

Anyway, here's a chart, unfortunately it does not include today's action, I'll have to wait until 1800 before my charting package is updated, but I will post another one later.

First important thing to note is that the RSI failure swings are intended to work only when the indicator is over 70 or under 30 to initiate a short or long position, not to initiate a long position if already over 70. Although it's an interesting concept, but one I feel laced with considerable risk. I'll have to look at the mathematics of the RSI to find out exactly what such an approach would entail.

Back to DOO: Mid June the SP was happliy bouncing within a reasonable trend and then a breakout (again this was confirmed by the RSI, that failure swing once more). Since then it is clear that the SP is in a much steeper channel and thus far is maintaining that channel. This particualr screenshot has compressed the chart somewhat, so it doesn't look that steep, but actually it is. As Cynic says, it needs to at least consolidate sometime if not retrace, problem is determining when it will stop and where support lies. The RSI would seem to set a cap on the move, the upslopey trendline and the horizontal line should both act as resistance and taking today's move into consideration it would appear that this might just be it for now. That isn't to say it WILL retrace, but that the price action will take a breather. The retracement will occur if the RSI support line is broken. If there is a retracement I see support at 240p+, this is the top of the previous shallower channel. If that doesn't hold then there is (although not drawn) a mid line to this particualr channel which would offer support at 220p+. If it were to falll that far I daresay the 50MA would be about in the same place by then and provide additional support.

pth

#2 - i agree
#3 - everyone knows history is bunkum!

#1 - this was such a significant occurence, that i do not think it can be discounted

therefore Murphy's Law supercedes Murphy's Technical Analysis in this specific .... lol!

Seeing that MLR is been ramped all over the chip shop by a certain poster, thought I would have a look at the chart. Problem with these tiddlers is that the price action can and is often quite erratic and somewhat dificult to discern a pattern and therefore a half decent analysis.



This chart doesn't include today's price action, but we know it lost 0.50p.

The chart itself shows two uptrends, the more recent quite steep and the shallower a much longer term trend, but still up. There is also longer term resistance at 15.5p (red line). Since Feb this year what can also be seen is a fairly robust downtrend on the RSI, this has capped any rise on a number of occasions, including the most recent push to break effectively through 15p. What is quite interesting is that the RSI is actually showing bearish divergence in comparison to the SP, ie the RSI has declined whilst the SP has risen, theoretically not good. What is also apparent is the bearish divergence on the MACD, again the MACD has recorded a lower high (just) at the end of May whilst the SP has risen, seemingly confirming that the rise over the last 5 months is not supported by TA.

Looking to the immediate future I don't believe that the steeper trendline on the chart is sustainable nor will the support on the RSI do any actual support. Best guess is that the SP will revert to the longer term trendline and settle at around 12p.

Having said all that I certainly wouldn't short MLR, the TA just isn't strong enough, but then I certainly wouldn't buy at the moment either. As I said in the first paragraph, these tiddlers really can shift on good or bad news and 30% moves in either direction negate TA full stop.

pth

pth
Here's my 5 entry fee. Actually I sneaked in earlier to take a look at this thread - came in whilst you wern't looking.

Good thread - should flush out some interesting observations - and am really looking forward to your TA - Thrush Analysis - I suspect it'll all come down to administering Canestan to help the irritating little infection :)

Haven't really spent much time on RSI - more an SMA, EMA, MACD man myself - but with SIMPLE being the basis of everything I do - even my underwear - if you know what I mean.

Bearing up under the other stuff BTW.

mg :) LoL

Good to hear you are coping with the other stuff and I do hope that continues to be the case.

Until recently I hadn't really spent much time on RSI either, but I stumbled across a website, more a web page really discussing the issue of overbought and oversold. Basically we read that it is that sort of indicator but it isn't, and the more I look at RSI on charts, I realise how useful it can be, especially when above 70 and below 30 if used correctly. I also like the MACD, particularly the divergence, although I have found by experience that aspect must not be used as a sole reference, it can lead to some ill timed trades.

Less I know about your underwear the better I think ;))

pth

I must thank you for your time and consideration in posting the TA, charts and all.

Wheras I am absolutely and totally lost on these things as they are abmittedly way over my head, I put my faith in the fundamentals for my workings out.

I agree that there is a very strong resistance at 15p but I feel that we could breach this at anytime.

Once breached I believe we will see 25/30p.

I expect good results in September, I believe they are due, and from there on better.

Thank you for your most kind and considerate effort.

i second what PT says about tiddlers, and much the same can be said about new issues where there is so little history and the chances of considerable churning .... nevertheless, the charts still have aplace in these stocks, though they need to be treated with even greater care than usual.

Here is yet another lesson to be learned. I have not been following the DOO story and when I posted my previous analysis the chart was fairly short term. Since I have looked at a longer term chart, now always, always look at the longer term chart.



What is blindingly obvious is that at the end of June DOO broke out of a downtrend from early 2005, not only that it, clasically retraced using the previous downtrend as support and subsequently a platform for a considerable rise backed up by volume and the RSI. Often breakouts from long term trends can be rather explosive. What is also now apparent is that resistance is at 300p and then 325p. Also note that DOO has on a quite regular basis moved rather quickly.

pth