Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

TEXAS OIL&GAS WORTH DOUBLE THE SHARE PRICE (TXO)     

sagem - 14 Aug 2004 20:37





This company has KNOWN oil deposits in the ground which have been independantly valued at $12 million.
Now that oil is increasing in value and a world shortage this valuation must now be worth considerably more. THE SHARE PRICE IS TOTALLY UNDERVALUED and will have to be re-rated upwards. Any views or up dates on this suggestion.

Bruce Rowan's Sunvest Group have a stake of 8.000.000 million shares or 10.8% Bruce Rowan is involved with Share Shop PLC An investment company I beleive.

Texas Oil and Gas are making real money.


stockdog - 06 Jul 2005 21:49 - 7 of 131

Thinking of buying in for a fairly rapid (6 months) doubling in price. Have emailed FD for news of when March 2005 accounts to be published. Recommended by Tom Bulford in May RHPSG after meeting with Mike Chandler - seems very positive about low risk prospects for making shut in wells economic at $30-50 per barrell. At $60 should start to see some action.

My guess is these shares are below the parapet of most investors currently. Anyone know who holds these in volume?

Looks like we may have hit a bottom, but we could drift further back to the 11-12p suport level of 2003. I'd love an RNS with an update on production/proftability.

sd


skyhigh - 19 Jul 2005 08:13 - 8 of 131

Anyone still in TXO ?
I'm thinking of buying some this week.... Finals are due in Aug. should be some potential for the SP to rise ?

skyhigh - 19 Jul 2005 08:13 - 9 of 131

Anyone still in TXO ?
I'm thinking of buying some this week.... Finals are due in Aug. should be some potential for the SP to rise ?

stockdog - 19 Jul 2005 08:31 - 10 of 131

Watching them closely since RHPS recommended them - like the proposition, simple easily understood business. Get an old well with 40% of its contents removed under natural pressure, install a submersible pump and pump out another 20-40% into a $60 per barrel oil price. Nothing fancy, just profitable - and he has a couple of hundred or so of them.

sd

stockdog - 19 Jul 2005 09:43 - 11 of 131

BTW - I got a reply to my enquiry whiuch I forgot to post. Here it is.

TXO will be issuing their year end results towards the end of this month, which will be followed by the publication of their annual report.

Kind regards,
Yvonne


Yvonne Bate
Aquila Financial Limited
90 Long Acre
Covent Garden
London
WC2E 9RZ

Big question - buy now on spec - or wait for results and risk missing the first jump in SP??

Any suggestions?

sd

skyhigh - 19 Jul 2005 10:03 - 12 of 131

stockdog.... thank you for the information about the results timing - likewise I have been watching them closely as well since RHPS recommended them -
I'm not going to wait..will buy in next couple of days... SP is near the bottom of it's trading range so downside ought to be minimal... however,,, when i go into a share it normally goes down fo a variety of reasons I hadn't reckoned on... so ... in for a penny in for pound as they say !

stockdog - 19 Jul 2005 10:10 - 13 of 131

I got a dummy trade quote of 15.19p this morning - I think that's as good as it will get, although it would be aesthetically pleasing to get under 15p.



Forget all that - just checked the price and bought at 14.7p!

sd

paperbag - 20 Jul 2005 01:26 - 14 of 131

If TXO are posting their end of year results soon, and the share price at this stage is at its lowest, I feel that it may be a fair indication that the results may not be that great. What do you think?

stockdog - 20 Jul 2005 01:38 - 15 of 131

They will not be brilliant for last year, since they have only started to bring their newest acquisitions into commission late in last trading year. But the trading update for the first few months of this year should be highly encouraging.

I am keeping to a tight stop loss on these in case you are right.

sd

skyhigh - 22 Jul 2005 09:16 - 16 of 131

Well, I'm in ! had to pay .155p... as always, the offer ticked up as I made my mind up to buy in ... this is normal for me and the stocks I go in for...Also, another warning.!!!!.. the shares i buy that are tipped to double..... usually loose 50% of their value in the first few weeks/months and then do nothing ! don't know why I bother most of the time...
Let's see if it's different with this one ! :)

stockdog - 22 Jul 2005 10:24 - 17 of 131

Thanks Skyhigh for that encouraging commentary - would you mind if I made my profit before you bought in and jinxed them next time please!

This is a bit of a speculative one for me - I like the story and, at $50-60 a barrell, makes good money. But can't read the market in these shares which is very thin most of the time as to timing. If we do fall through the recent 14p support on results then we could go back down to 11.5p, but I set my hopes on a bog standard expected result for last year and healthy forward looking prospects for the current year which may well lift the SP back up through the 200dma to the 17-20p trading range where it may mark time until the half year trading update at end of September before moving higher towards double its current price within 12 months from now. Any intervening good news will accelerate this process.

Anyway, that's my game plan. My actions will be governed by the deviation of reality from it.

BTW don't fret about paying 15.5p - the extra .5p is irrelevant to the broad success or failure of your investment. Enjoy the ride.

sd

stockdog - 29 Jul 2005 08:33 - 18 of 131

What's happening today?

Spread widened to 18%! bid stays the same at 14.5p, offer goes up to 17.5p - don't MMs want to sell whilst we wait for results in next few days (end July I was told by both the company and their PR co - that's today, but I don't see it yet - probably Mon or Tue)?

Any ideas?

sd

skyhigh - 29 Jul 2005 09:32 - 19 of 131

Can't be bad... bid has now moved up as well ! looking good since i went in last week.... hoping for big leap in SP on results release... :) also oil socks strong today...

stockdog - 29 Jul 2005 23:33 - 20 of 131

nice end to the week on a strong note, ready fior action next week on results, I hope. Chart looking perky too.

aimtrader - 31 Jul 2005 19:53 - 21 of 131

stockdog,

well i think id like to see the downtrend pierced before any purchase!!!

on the watchlist for now

stockdog - 01 Aug 2005 08:51 - 22 of 131

aimtrader - agree these are quite speculative at present. But the downward pointing triangle - bounded on top by the March peak to the recent July peak whilst the lows have fallen less fast - was technically broken upwards in the last couple of days.

I guess you could wait for the SP to break decisively up through the 200dma and the 25dma to break up through the 50dma for a more certain signal.

The forward looking statement(s) in the results will tell all soon enough. I'm optimistic, but impatient that they missed publication in July as promised in their emails to me. Can't be long now, though.

sd

stockdog - 02 Aug 2005 09:23 - 23 of 131

Results finally published today. Solid growth reported to 31/3/05 as expected, with slight disappointment that Trinity South West project proved uncoommercial (9% holding by TXO).

The real interest is the increase in proven reserves to 10,449,756 barrels with an NPV of $52,576,370, assuming an oil price of $46.50 per barrel, which equates to approximately 36p per share. At $55 per barrell, this must be approaching 50p per share.

The capital resources of the company looks solid with not too much dilutive disadvantage to exisitng shareholders, giving them enough capital to develop their remaining acquired wells.

Market seems largely indifferent. A few sells and fewer buys, whilst the bid is marked up .5p.

Any other views?

sd

skyhigh - 02 Aug 2005 10:05 - 24 of 131

I was thinking of going in on BLR and will probably do so this week.... operating costs/expenses were higher than forecasted and that's why there is more urgency in getting production / output up.... I still don't think there is too much downside so will go in.....

stockdog - 09 Aug 2005 20:34 - 25 of 131

Well, TXO's results have set the SP off like a damp squib. So what is the company worth? I had a couple of questions which I fired off to FD Andrew Glendinning which he graciously answered within a couple of days, which I have incorporated into a model I've been building for the year to March 2006 and beyond. It goes something like this:-

At end March 2005 they had 18 100% owned wells in production and 58 50% owned, using 2 rigs which I have, on an informed guess, allocated as to 1 wholly working on the 50% owned and 1 split 50/50 between 100% owned and 50% owned - this would fit pretty much with the increase in number of wells of each type in production since March 2004. They are getting a third rig which I have assumed will be allocated fully to 100% owned wells, coming into commission from the start of Q2.

Projecting historical rate per rig of putting wells into production, the number of wells in production will rise over the year to 54 100% owned and 102 50% owned - an effective 100% owned equivalent average of 73 over the year. Taking historical rate of production of 68.5 barrels per well per month, this will yield 60,004 barrels for the year.

Last year the average price can be back-calculated as $43.76 per barrel at an average exchange rate (courtesy of AG) of 1.853 $/, yielding gross income of 766,824 from which must be deducted a 20% royalty (as confirmed by AG) to arrive at turnover for the year of 613,459 (as per recent results). Multiplying the projected 60,004 barrels for 2006 by an estimated oil price of $55 per barrel at an exchange rate estimated at 1.80, less a 20% royalty gives turnover for 2006 of 1,466,768.

The gross margin for 2005 was 35% and the administrative costs were 502,654; net interest payable was 75,002. Let's assume the equivalent figures for 2006 are 37.5% (small improvement in margin), 552,919 (10% increase for more activity + inflation) and 75,000. This gives us a loss for the year of 77,881.

This is a big improvement, being about one fifth of 2005's net loss, but still not making a positive number. However, at 31st March 2006 there will remain (of their current estate) only 3 50% owned wells not in production. So, after the first month of the year, the entire effort of the three rigs can now be turned to commissioning 100% owned wells. By end of March 2007, there will be the full 105 50% owned wells and 139 100% owned wells in production yielding 121,858 barrels worth annual turnover of 2,978,745 with net profits of about 522,000. For year to March 2008 all currently owned wells will be producing, with a net profit of about 1.09million

With 83,413,116 shares in issue (and assuming that the 25.5 million warrants issued to DKWS are only exercised in respect of funding new acquisitions) that's an eps of 0.625p per share giving, at the current SP of 15p a PE of 24 for 2007, and a PE of 11.5 for 2008.

So what price the shares today? According to the NPV of the reserves of $52,576,370, the company is worth about 35p per share - equivalent to a PE for 2008 of 29. Perhaps a 2008 PE of about 20 for this rapidly annual increasing profit profile in a continuing ambience of strong oil prices and growing demand versus restricted supplies (China requiring more and more new sources), suggesting an SP of 26p, a 25% discount to NPV.

To the above must be added the prospects for Trinity South East (25% interest) which are in the above numbers for free and the acquisition of further wells or interests funded by exercise of warrants or new share issue(s).

I will be intrigued to see how the promised quarterly updates compare with my modelled results and how the SP reacts over the next 12 months. On balance I think this is a fairly low risk mid-term hold which should see the price increase by two thirds by Xmas 2005 and double by end of March next year. Any results substantially better than I predict above should see this rise accelerated.

Any comments or counter-views welcome.

sd

stockdog - 16 Aug 2005 15:10 - 26 of 131

Come on, guys. I pour my little heart out a week ago now and not a single response. Is it because:-

a) You are all in agreement with me and are stunned with admiration for my perspicacity?

b) You all totally disagree with me and don't think it's worth a response?

c) You all know something I don't and have sold up and moved on?

This dog wants someone to throw his stick for him. Meanwhile, up we tick.

sd

Register now or login to post to this thread.