bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
niceonecyril
- 08 Jul 2005 10:12
- 7050 of 27111
From advfn,
ii You posted 49178 after being told of the bombs,
A.Q. they want them owing to Isreali links with SEO.
you then went on to post at 11 00am same post as 7002
on this board.
cyril
jimmy b
- 08 Jul 2005 10:13
- 7051 of 27111
If you had any integrity now ,you would just vanish from this thread..
hewittalan6
- 08 Jul 2005 10:22
- 7052 of 27111
ii officially rumbled as a contemptible maggot.
Rasenberg
- 08 Jul 2005 10:27
- 7053 of 27111
Isnt it about time moneyam acted with regards to this ar5ehole !!! ii has gone beyond SEO bashing now and it cant be good for money am to be seen as condoning this kind of poster in light of yesterdays events with no hint of an apology whatsoever.
ii you make me sick
IanT(MoneyAM)
- 08 Jul 2005 10:30
- 7054 of 27111
Rasenberg,
rest assured we monitor these threads and we will continue to do so - we will make any decisions as to removal of access for any poster.
May I suggest that everyone now returns to the discussion of hand and we will do the monitoring.
Ian
bhunt1910
- 08 Jul 2005 10:32
- 7055 of 27111
Ian - twould be nice if you took on board the comments re ii.
I have a compromise solution - let ii have a thread all of his own - so that those who want to read his banter can do so - but ban him from the rest of the threads.
Thank you
Baza
Rasenberg
- 08 Jul 2005 10:33
- 7056 of 27111
Many thx IanT. Good to know its looked at.
roma
- 08 Jul 2005 11:17
- 7057 of 27111
Maybe the rhps tip "BUY" to 25p received last night,is taking some effect,there seems to be a good take up today. Roll on some more good news.
Chiva20
- 08 Jul 2005 11:26
- 7058 of 27111
Perhaps rather than banning ii Ian I think it would help if you could discreetly have a word and ask him to behave more appropriately, at least it will serve to make him think twice before posting. That might go some way to improving the thread for everyone. Last I'll say on the subject.
The completion of the third trial is iminent so hopefully we'll see a leap very soon. I feel an rns in the wind next week
insiderinside
- 08 Jul 2005 11:31
- 7059 of 27111
Last word from me on the subject as I should reply to the further comments since my last post - some may wish to scour the web to find posts at different times - and to further their petty cause of trying to have a go at me - the saying involving "true words spoken in jest" holds here - and as you can see I commented no further after finding out it was bombs here. As you have copied over comments elsewhere I should make comment on them - the same accusations by some of the same people here were fired off over there - about trying to make profit from this horrible and sad event - to which I replied they should look at the people filling their boots on the dip - and not my comments which were taken out on context given the timing. I made no profit on yesterdays horrible events - but many people throwing abuse at me - made nice profits on their quick buying yesterday - to profit some this sad event.
I do feel sorry for those who are small minded enough to deliberatly misunderstand but that is their choice as is everything in life.
Back to SE0 - still no orders - can expect trial update any time soon - but still expecting no major orders with it - expecting the Youngs "dozen" machines to appear on the order front soon to back up the talk - but nothing further than that. The downgrades of forecasts / slow uptake to me says there are severe problems ahead short term and probably mid term too.
Fred1new
- 08 Jul 2005 11:43
- 7060 of 27111
IC update brings a little sanity back to this share, marking it as fairly priced with PE of 73! Suggesting sensibly that punters should await further developments and evidence of Greenseal sales.
I think derampers bring a little reality to this board as a ballance to wishful thinking.
ptholden
- 08 Jul 2005 11:45
- 7061 of 27111
ii. Maybe you did not make any profits on trading yesterday, but you certainly used the situation to continue to bash SEO. Perhaps something along the lines of, 'apologies if my inappropriate and stupid remarks have caused offence' would have gone a long way to mitigating your unbelievable and indefensible posts. Strange how many other people deliberately misunderstood your remarks, as always the ii spin in order to twist the truth.
Also my last word on the subject, back to being squelched and informed comments from other posters on the prospects of SEO.
pth
pth
proptrade
- 08 Jul 2005 11:49
- 7062 of 27111
ii, i will take that as an apology.
unlike many other posters i welcome the negativity, as long as it is substantiated in the same ways the positive is posted.
always happy to fight my corner with the truth.
rgds
PT
TANKER
- 08 Jul 2005 11:49
- 7063 of 27111
we should see a nice jump soon
jammyjimmy
- 08 Jul 2005 12:13
- 7064 of 27111
TANKER
..........Why? Enlighten us, please.
proptrade
- 08 Jul 2005 12:26
- 7067 of 27111
never question the TANKER.
he has spoken.
jimmy b
- 08 Jul 2005 12:54
- 7068 of 27111
No i can confirm jammyjimmy is not me...JB.
bosley
- 08 Jul 2005 12:57
- 7069 of 27111
understandably light volume today. driver, glad to see you up and about. tanker, thanks for the insightful comments, so wonderfully expansive...... proptrade, each to their own, but that was never an apology. that was a worm's righteous justification for his actions by comparing them to the actions of even bigger worms.