Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

stanelco .......a new thread (SEO)     

bosley - 20 Feb 2004 09:34

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&SiChart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=SEO&Si

for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm


Chiva20 - 08 Jul 2005 11:26 - 7058 of 27111

Perhaps rather than banning ii Ian I think it would help if you could discreetly have a word and ask him to behave more appropriately, at least it will serve to make him think twice before posting. That might go some way to improving the thread for everyone. Last I'll say on the subject.

The completion of the third trial is iminent so hopefully we'll see a leap very soon. I feel an rns in the wind next week


insiderinside - 08 Jul 2005 11:31 - 7059 of 27111

Last word from me on the subject as I should reply to the further comments since my last post - some may wish to scour the web to find posts at different times - and to further their petty cause of trying to have a go at me - the saying involving "true words spoken in jest" holds here - and as you can see I commented no further after finding out it was bombs here. As you have copied over comments elsewhere I should make comment on them - the same accusations by some of the same people here were fired off over there - about trying to make profit from this horrible and sad event - to which I replied they should look at the people filling their boots on the dip - and not my comments which were taken out on context given the timing. I made no profit on yesterdays horrible events - but many people throwing abuse at me - made nice profits on their quick buying yesterday - to profit some this sad event.

I do feel sorry for those who are small minded enough to deliberatly misunderstand but that is their choice as is everything in life.

Back to SE0 - still no orders - can expect trial update any time soon - but still expecting no major orders with it - expecting the Youngs "dozen" machines to appear on the order front soon to back up the talk - but nothing further than that. The downgrades of forecasts / slow uptake to me says there are severe problems ahead short term and probably mid term too.

Fred1new - 08 Jul 2005 11:43 - 7060 of 27111

IC update brings a little sanity back to this share, marking it as fairly priced with PE of 73! Suggesting sensibly that punters should await further developments and evidence of Greenseal sales.

I think derampers bring a little reality to this board as a ballance to wishful thinking.

ptholden - 08 Jul 2005 11:45 - 7061 of 27111

ii. Maybe you did not make any profits on trading yesterday, but you certainly used the situation to continue to bash SEO. Perhaps something along the lines of, 'apologies if my inappropriate and stupid remarks have caused offence' would have gone a long way to mitigating your unbelievable and indefensible posts. Strange how many other people deliberately misunderstood your remarks, as always the ii spin in order to twist the truth.
Also my last word on the subject, back to being squelched and informed comments from other posters on the prospects of SEO.

pth

pth

proptrade - 08 Jul 2005 11:49 - 7062 of 27111

ii, i will take that as an apology.

unlike many other posters i welcome the negativity, as long as it is substantiated in the same ways the positive is posted.

always happy to fight my corner with the truth.

rgds
PT

TANKER - 08 Jul 2005 11:49 - 7063 of 27111

we should see a nice jump soon

jammyjimmy - 08 Jul 2005 12:13 - 7064 of 27111

TANKER
..........Why? Enlighten us, please.

driver - 08 Jul 2005 12:20 - 7065 of 27111

Thanks to every one for their kind words regarding me getting out of R/Square and finally getting home. Today is another day yesterday should be put behind us, stuff AQ the only way they can stop us is to kill us all, heres looking forward to all those big fat orders from the USA, oh and of coarse lets not forget the Olympics.

driver - 08 Jul 2005 12:23 - 7066 of 27111

jammyjimmy
Youre not our jimmy who has taken a fancy to jam by any chance.

proptrade - 08 Jul 2005 12:26 - 7067 of 27111

never question the TANKER.

he has spoken.

jimmy b - 08 Jul 2005 12:54 - 7068 of 27111

No i can confirm jammyjimmy is not me...JB.

bosley - 08 Jul 2005 12:57 - 7069 of 27111

understandably light volume today. driver, glad to see you up and about. tanker, thanks for the insightful comments, so wonderfully expansive...... proptrade, each to their own, but that was never an apology. that was a worm's righteous justification for his actions by comparing them to the actions of even bigger worms.

driver - 08 Jul 2005 12:57 - 7070 of 27111

.

driver - 08 Jul 2005 12:58 - 7071 of 27111

jimmy
What you only like marmalade then?

pisces - 08 Jul 2005 13:00 - 7072 of 27111

Just heard Tony Blair talking from the G8 summit about greenhouse gas emmisions saying that they hope to not only reduce the gasses but in time reverse them.Does the fact that seo have biodegradable materials stand in there favour.Would be interested on feedback from those in the Know.

proptrade - 08 Jul 2005 13:08 - 7073 of 27111

i hear the G8 leaders are avid readers and posters on this threat...TANKER we know you are Bush in disguise! (to that matter ii must be Chirac!!!!!!!!!!! LOL LOL!)

jimmy b - 08 Jul 2005 13:39 - 7074 of 27111

I wouldn't call myself jammyjimmy driver,,ive never been jammy in my life,,if i was i'd be rich by now...pS TANKER your pure genius welcome back..

TANKER - 08 Jul 2005 13:41 - 7075 of 27111

look at my tips on seo thread all up.

markusantonius - 08 Jul 2005 14:32 - 7076 of 27111

II, Can I ask you if YOU are a holder of SEO? If not then WHY do you continue to post so much? I agree that everyone has their say and balanced perspectives need to be aired for everyone's benefit. But I do not understand where you are coming from?

Yes, even a complete idiot recognises that SEO is way overvalued at the moment but shareholders and institutions are punting on POTENTIAL. Isn't this what investing in small caps is all about?

All you seem to write is negative stuf! Is there anything GOOD about the company which you like?

bhunt1910 - 08 Jul 2005 15:39 - 7077 of 27111

Hey Mark - dont encourage him for Christs sake - he has on many occassions said that he does not own any shares - he just likes to give us the benefit of his many years of experience - which if you had take any notice of would have cost you a fortune. He is bound to be right sometime - but mainly he tries to scaremonger. There are many others who provide balanced analysis of this share without all the hystrionics.

Baza
Register now or login to post to this thread.