for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

No i can confirm jammyjimmy is not me...JB.

understandably light volume today. driver, glad to see you up and about. tanker, thanks for the insightful comments, so wonderfully expansive...... proptrade, each to their own, but that was never an apology. that was a worm's righteous justification for his actions by comparing them to the actions of even bigger worms.

.

jimmy
What you only like marmalade then?

Just heard Tony Blair talking from the G8 summit about greenhouse gas emmisions saying that they hope to not only reduce the gasses but in time reverse them.Does the fact that seo have biodegradable materials stand in there favour.Would be interested on feedback from those in the Know.

i hear the G8 leaders are avid readers and posters on this threat...TANKER we know you are Bush in disguise! (to that matter ii must be Chirac!!!!!!!!!!! LOL LOL!)

I wouldn't call myself jammyjimmy driver,,ive never been jammy in my life,,if i was i'd be rich by now...pS TANKER your pure genius welcome back..

look at my tips on seo thread all up.

II, Can I ask you if YOU are a holder of SEO? If not then WHY do you continue to post so much? I agree that everyone has their say and balanced perspectives need to be aired for everyone's benefit. But I do not understand where you are coming from?

Yes, even a complete idiot recognises that SEO is way overvalued at the moment but shareholders and institutions are punting on POTENTIAL. Isn't this what investing in small caps is all about?

All you seem to write is negative stuf! Is there anything GOOD about the company which you like?

Hey Mark - dont encourage him for Christs sake - he has on many occassions said that he does not own any shares - he just likes to give us the benefit of his many years of experience - which if you had take any notice of would have cost you a fortune. He is bound to be right sometime - but mainly he tries to scaremonger. There are many others who provide balanced analysis of this share without all the hystrionics.

Baza

Fish, what does SEO's packaging material biodegrade into?

I suppose Tanker's alter ego will soon appear - THINKERTANKER - in keeping with other double barrelled entertainers on this thread.

Hi Jammyjimmy, bossybosley, ricereric, diverdriver . . .

love

Stickstockdigdog

All set for SETS on Monday?

ooo! zscrooge. is that for real?

Yes - SEO becomes a SETS MM share on Monday so this is a heads up for you.

You can read about SETS MM at -

http://freeserve.advfn.com/columns/robbie_burns.php


Mark - There is a great deal of potential upside with SEO - however it is very much in the realms of jam tomorrow or even the day after that - IMO there are problems which are being covered up - in the event I can see orders reaching the 500 level I would change my tune - however IMO we are not going to see that this year and there is a good chance neither next year too. A share like SE0 which is trading very much (too much) on future projected earnings it is a great risk - for me SE0 is now trading on 2008 projected earnings and news flow (which means Walmart is in the price already) - this is far too risky - the slightest delay or problem could and probably will bring it crashing down bringing great losses to many people. There are those who got in at 2.5p or 4p and any potential crash they will not be worried about - but for those in at the 20p to 30p plus there is a very great deal to lose IF things go wrong - IMO the recent downward changes to forecasts and slow order levels already stands out loud that problems are there - the question is how serious - in the event there are not 75 confirmed orders in place by October the 31st (the end of SEO financial year) my bearish sentiment will be confirmed as correct for me.

A lot of the present gain is from RHPS tips (14p up) - and history is scattered with the big rise and then the big drop after RHPS tips and later says its gone wrong so sell.

bos, just about par for this board LOL

Its just been pointed out on another board, that from Monday SEO
as a small caps company will trade as a SETS MM COMPANY.
Any thoughts on this.
cyril

Don't know what you're talking about. Can someone please explain?

excellent news, some transparency in the SET`s dealing will be very welcome, it spells the end for rampers like PMT - and about time too.

Cyril hi,


29 March 2005

LONDON STOCK EXCHANGE ANNOUNCES EXTENSION OF SETSmm

Following its market consultation, the London Stock Exchange today announced the extension of SETSmm, its successful hybrid electronic order book, to cover 200 more securities.

The Exchange will introduce a phased rollout of the changes, beginning with the migration of 200 Small Cap securities on its Main Market in July 2005. Assuming this is successful, the remaining Small Cap securities will be migrated in December 2005.

Further work with market participants will be undertaken regarding the transfer of the most liquid AIM securities to SETSmm. The transfer of the most liquid AIM securities to SETSmm is being examined in conjunction with the introduction of a new benchmark AIM index, currently under development with FTSE International.

Commenting on the changes, Martin Graham, the Exchanges Director of Market Services, said:

Since its launch, SETSmm has been very successful in increasing liquidity and reducing trading costs and we are pleased to introduce the benefits of SETSmm to 200 more securities on our markets. These changes will bring real benefits to companies, investors and market participants, as well as enhancing Londons position as the most efficient cash equity market in Europe.

Alongside the extension of SETSmm, the Exchange will, subject to regulatory approval introduce a tailored incentive package for liquidity providers to ensure maximum opportunity for continued and deep liquidity provision in Small Cap securities.

In addition, the Exchange has set objective criteria upon which to judge whether securities are suitable for trading on SETSmm. This will ensure that securities are trading on the optimal platform and, where a particular security does not trade as expected, it will be transferred back to a quote-driven system.

In response to the recent consultation, the Exchange has decided not to implement a pilot reduction in tick-size for five SETS securities for the time being. The Exchange will continue to discuss with customers alternative means of testing whether a reduction in tick sizes would, in practice, benefit investors across the market.



Cheers,
PM