Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Referendum : to be in Europe or not to be ?, that is the question ! (REF)     

required field - 03 Feb 2016 10:00

Thought I'd start a new thread as this is going to be a major talking point this year...have not made up my mind yet...(unlike bucksfizz)....but thinking of voting for an exit as Europe is not doing Britain any good at all it seems....

Stan - 18 Jul 2017 07:30 - 7106 of 12628

Here's a suggestion boys, what about here? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-40631452/the-seoul-train-that-goes-to-the-border-and-back

Just a small problem of getting in of course but hay ho!

This could be a job for that British Bulldog.. yes I give you that Master Negotiator the one and only...?

2517GEORGE - 18 Jul 2017 08:53 - 7107 of 12628

From post 103

''Also, if you make a mistake and take the wrong route I hope you are allowed to stop and reverse''.

Fred advocating a U turn whereas in the past he has been vociferous in his condemnation of them. I guess this one would suit so it's ok. Typical Labour hypocrite

jimmy b - 18 Jul 2017 09:12 - 7108 of 12628

I see funny farm Fred and silly Stan still here spouting their rubbish and bile.

Fred1new - 18 Jul 2017 09:13 - 7109 of 12628

George.

Just observant of strong stable leadership and government and what it means to some.

Never, found difficulty in accepting when I have made mistakes and usually try to correct the resulting situation and not repeat them.

Often annoying, but useful lessons.


Recognise or realise that I seem to have survived reasonably well doing so.

Also, believed in trial and error, and believe it is useful sometimes, hopefully recognising the errors earlier enough to modify decisions and prevent serious consequences.

-=-=-

But the problem is that many of tory right winged elitist and rabble followers in government at the present time think they can walk on water and are hoping for miracles to save their own skins.

Fred1new - 18 Jul 2017 09:14 - 7110 of 12628

Dumbo,

You are seeing things again.

Change your diet.

jimmy b - 18 Jul 2017 09:59 - 7111 of 12628

Only you, a misguided drunk from the funny farm.

Fred1new - 18 Jul 2017 10:47 - 7112 of 12628

Dumbo,

I wondered where you resided the most of your time.

Ask for some more medication.

cynic - 18 Jul 2017 10:50 - 7113 of 12628

is voting to be free of the imposition of judgments passed down by ECJ or ECHR a vote FOR something or a vote AGAINST something?

what do you think fred?

Dil - 18 Jul 2017 11:03 - 7114 of 12628

Or voting for control of our own borders ?

I suggest it was the remoaners voting against something ... leaving and were not voting for anything positive in staying.

cynic - 18 Jul 2017 11:06 - 7115 of 12628

indeed dil ...... as always, it depends which way round one words the question

Stan - 18 Jul 2017 11:14 - 7116 of 12628

So where are you lot off to if not to 7104?

Fred1new - 18 Jul 2017 12:23 - 7117 of 12628

Manuel and Dil.

You can set up a little isolated england and the 13th county and rule it as a thiefdom.

Mind gradually, little england will be more and more spurned by the rest of the world.

-=-=-=-=-

The universality of international laws, trading rules and regulations would be beneficial would be of benefit.

If you don't like the rules negotiate against them and get them reformed.

Don't stumble off like decrepit adolescent school boys who can't get their own way by blustering, shouting its unfair because we can't get our own ways.




2517GEORGE - 18 Jul 2017 12:34 - 7118 of 12628

Like Cameron after his negotiations for sod all from the EU bureaucrats, is that what you mean Fred? As for being spurned by the rest of the world the opposite seems to be the case. Tell me, why do you not wish to trade worldwide, why are you so intent on only dealing with the shrinking (GDP) EU.

MaxK - 18 Jul 2017 14:12 - 7119 of 12628


Europe English


The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the EU rather than German which was the other possibility.

As part of the negotiations, Her Majesty's Government conceded that English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a five year phase-in plan that would be known as "Euro-English".

In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this will make the sivil servants jump with joy. The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of the "k". This should klear up konfusion and keyboards kan have 1 less letter.

There will be growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year, when the troublesome "ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like "fotograf" 20% shorter.

In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be ekspekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are possible. Governments will enkorage the removal of double letters, which have always ben a deterent to akurate speling. Also, al wil agre that the horible mes of the silent "e"s in the language is disgraseful, and they should go away.

By the fourth year, peopl wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th" with "z" and "w" with "v". During ze fifz year, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords kontaining "ou" and similar changes vud of kors be aplid to ozer kombinations of leters.

After zis fifz yer, ve vil hav a reli sensibl riten styl. Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi to understand ech ozer.



Ze drem vil finali kum tru!

Stan - 18 Jul 2017 14:19 - 7120 of 12628

So where are you lot off to if not to 7104?

Come on I need to know.

MaxK - 18 Jul 2017 14:25 - 7121 of 12628

Who says we have to be off to anywhere Stan?

MaxK - 18 Jul 2017 14:30 - 7122 of 12628


Theresa May is in a mess because she isn't a proper Brexiteer. The next Prime Minister must be

By
Tim Stanley

17 July 2017 • 6:22pm




David Davis has emerged in the last few weeks as a man of stature and integrity Credit: Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP




Who should replace Theresa May as prime minister? The answer is not who but what: a Brexiteer. And I mean a proper Brexiteer, not one of these late converts. An old money, Churchill-quoting true believer who knows their Article 50 from their elbow.

Technically speaking, the position isn’t vacant. I’d rather it remained so. Theresa May is the only MP with any mandate from the electorate to govern and I truly believe she could turn things around given a chance. But party discipline has been lost, as the row over Cabinet leaks shows.

The Tories are Darwinian: they cannot be led by weakness. Husbands and wives are whispering in MPs’ ears: “You could do a better job than her, darling. Your time has come.” And never, ever underestimate the ambition of even the most 
anonymous Tory MP.



More here, but you have to pay:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/17/theresa-may-mess-isnt-proper-brexiteer-next-prime-minister-must/

Fred1new - 18 Jul 2017 14:34 - 7123 of 12628

Stan,

They could move into Nigel's pad in Armagnac, in France.

Thankfully, he doesn't seem to want to come back.

Stan - 18 Jul 2017 14:56 - 7124 of 12628

I'm afraid that's not far away enough Fred... I was rather hoping a different continent ):-

Max, because as you and most of the others on here seem to dislike being in Europe so much and (we most probably will still be in it) you will be looking elsewhere to live.

jimmy b - 18 Jul 2017 15:43 - 7125 of 12628

It's you two idiots who should go and live somewhere else ,you hate the UK .
Register now or login to post to this thread.