Crocodile
- 16 Dec 2002 03:59
Velocity
- 12 Aug 2003 14:31
- 714 of 11003
Help!
Since 7pm last night, within 5 mins of going online I get the following message:
The system is shutting down. Please save all work in progress and log off. Any unsaved changes will be lost.
This shutdown was initiated by NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM.
Time before shutdown ......45 secs
Windows must now restart because the Remote Procedure Call (RPC) service terminated unexpectedly.
I know someone is attacking me because I can see the poisonous little anorak on my Sygate Firewall.
Advice welcome as it has effectively paralysed my computer.
the troll
- 12 Aug 2003 14:34
- 715 of 11003
You'll be wanting to read the "freeserve disconnections countrywide" thread :-)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/56/32286.html
You must keep your PC up to date with Microsoft patches - visit www.windowsupdate.com regularly or install the auto-notification program to download updates automatically. The patch to protect against this exploit is several weeks old.
edit -
click here for a cleanup tool specific to this problem.
skinny
- 12 Aug 2003 14:40
- 716 of 11003
Not a major problem - but any ideas re my post 701?
the troll
- 12 Aug 2003 14:45
- 717 of 11003
skinny - a program which loads on startup is crashing, probably something you don't need since you're not noticing any other problem. See DocProc's post in reply to extrovert a few below your question. Uncheck one of the startup items, reboot and see if the problem goes away. If not, try the next one etc etc.
skinny
- 12 Aug 2003 14:46
- 718 of 11003
the troll - thanks I'll try this evening.
extrovert
- 12 Aug 2003 15:59
- 719 of 11003
thanks for your advice kayak/spaceman, things great and speedy now
peter
Captain Scarlet
- 12 Aug 2003 16:46
- 720 of 11003
Velocity - I've just heard from a pal with the same problem. He thinks its a virus called MS blast which he can't delete as it changes the registry. Will post further if he finds the answer. Good luck
ON EDIT
Go to www.f-secure.com/v-descs/msblast.shtml
where you can download a zip file and instructions on how to remove the virus
Velocity
- 12 Aug 2003 17:06
- 721 of 11003
Thanks v. much all - now been online for a (presumably worm-free) 20 mins so it seems to have sorted itself out at last which is a relief as it was seriously messing with my karma :-)
Cheers
V
TullettJ (MoneyAM)
- 12 Aug 2003 22:13
- 722 of 11003
Velocity,
check out
slashdot.org for a thread on this latest exploit (which was patched by MS back in June I believe), has details on how to fix it and how to kill the shutdown timer...
J.
kajman
- 13 Aug 2003 14:13
- 723 of 11003
Dead PC
We had a close lightning strike last weekend and the mains went all over the place. It took out my BT HH box and an ISDN router. My main PC was OK as I use surge protected sockets but my spare PC is dead. I tried a new ATX power supply today but all that happens is the processor fan turns for a second and then everything's dead again.
So probably a damaged m'board then. Is there anything I can do to check this other than buy a new one ?
cheers
Kayak
- 13 Aug 2003 14:39
- 724 of 11003
Take out the network card and any modem first, just in case they are dead from having been connected to the comms when it blew up, and are affecting the motherboard. If it still doesn't work then it very probably is the motherboard and possibly the CPU too.
If your second PC is just an older PC then the cheapest and easiest thing to do is probably to buy the same model of motherboard second-hand on eBay (sometimes older but new motherboards come up). Obviously you won't have the latest model but then again you won't spend ages planning the upgrade. Same for the processor if you have to change that, except that there you can move to the fastest supported by your motherboard. This is often a lot faster than is specified in the instruction manual since the motherboard does not actually see the processor speed, it is internal to the processor.
kajman
- 13 Aug 2003 15:02
- 725 of 11003
Thanks Kayak, looks like a new motheboard/CPU then. I might go for a speed increase - the old one was 466 Mhz Celeron.
zzaxx99
- 13 Aug 2003 15:57
- 727 of 11003
I have a little networking problem:
Have a company laptop, running NT4, configured to be part of Domain UVW. Now have a home network, running ADSL via a router. Works great apart from, when I boot into the "run with network" hardware profile to use this, it takes an age to time out the search for a domain controller - like 6-10 minutes.
Potential solutions:Change the timeout value in the search for a domain controller (how?)Set up the other PC on the network as a Win2K server instead of Win2K Pro, and set this up as a domain controller, with a domain also called UVW
Problems:Laptop can also simultaneously be connected to work network via ADSL - seems likely that having two machines as domain controller for the same domain name is going to cause conniptionsDon't want to install Active Directory, under any circumstances - can Server be set up as domain controller without created AD set-up?
zzaxx99
- 13 Aug 2003 15:58
- 728 of 11003
Problem two:
Buffalo router, was IP address 192.168.11.1 - now not replying on this address (works fine, but I need to access the config program to set up WEP), suspect I may have changed the address while fiddling. How can I find out the current address? Is there a tool that will list all the used IP addresses on my LAN? I know it's going to be 192.168.something.something - but rather loth to sit there pinging every combination until I get a response
zzaxx99
- 13 Aug 2003 16:09
- 731 of 11003
Didn't think the duplicate domain name was a goer - the more I thought about it, the more problematic it looked.
My first thought was that sleeping the laptop wouldn't work for me, as I have to reboot to a different hardware profile, but actually, I'm wondering if that is really true... I'm using NT4 on the laptop, which is infinitely worse than XP for coping with being docked/undocked/re-docked somewhere else, but I'll give it a try and see what happens...
zzaxx99
- 13 Aug 2003 16:09
- 732 of 11003
Re: the router - that's about the only one I can rule out - that's the modem! :-)