The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Good morning all>

Very shortly off for a spot of relaxation and hopefully plenty of sungood luck to Gillingham in the play-offsI am not a supporter Andy {West Ham}have only ever seen them play twiceand that was many years ago in the cupbut as the only team in Kent I wish them wellkeep posting..
Bouncy and the rest of the gang you will be in my thoughts over the next seven weeksflat pack with me but wifes instructions absolutely no BBsjust for family and stock checking. I can feel the kind vibes as I typeGood luck to Meldex and to Barry/Garrywe are back!exciting times
Voyez-vous bient et merci Cay and Lisabe safe in the markets

J'espe que vous avez une vacances agrbles, Chilli.

Tabasco,

Bon voyage!

ROFLMAO ... edmund posts in the zoo , he was doing so years ago when he was tipping crap in one of the Sundays.

He had a go at me on the MDX thread last xmas when I highlighted a post from CAT from a few years ago calling him "sit on the fence Jackson".


That article says feck all ... get off the fence Jackson and for once in your life make a call ... should punters invest or not ???


Geez some things never change.

Ask me what I think Edmund.

lol

Edmund? Sounds more like Baldrick.

Baldrick had a cunning plan.

We'll all be in Tabatha's thoughts over the whole 7 weeks. Doesn't surprise me, but very sad. ;-0

Now to MDX. I've read Edmund for many years. Like all of us he can be right and he can be wrong. The whole point here is the problems in MDX were flagged an awful long time ago for those who opened their eyes. Others continued to pour money in. The bears' target price was breached over the period - good call.

Now, should the 6m minimum be raised, does it make MDX an investment? Quite possible is the answer, but still very high risk given many tried to make it a success and failed abysmally, including those currently in charge.

The good thing is that if it does look like recovering we can all get in at most a quarter of the price Tabatha and most in the zoo are currently sitting at. ;-)))

Who's right and who's wrong in their decision-making process? Now that is cunning! ;-)

PS

The problem with the Monopoly analogy here is you do not get 200 quid as you didn't pass "GO"; you went back. ;-0

Are Tabby's prperties down the Old Kent Road? LOL!

Anyone else missing tabby .......................... nor me :-)


Oi Barry , when do we get the announcment re the failure to raise sufficient funds and you waltz off with the IP as predicted pre xmas by some in the zoo ???

Regards

A Shareholder

Dil

I think Barry may prefer to be known as Kevin Cassey. I'm told that every lying, cheating fraudster needs a pseudonym or two.

G

Carry on like that and he'll pop up here threatening to sue you then disappear up his own ar*e without answering any relevant questions on why anyone should chuck good money after bad.

Andy , hows the fund raising going ? Couldn't be bothered to trawl through all the crap over at the zoo.

Cheers

I'd say it's taking an awful long time. ;-0

1 by christmas says Barry


lynxboy - 14 May'09 - 07:58 - 1853 of 2019

hold on there taps! lol simply waiting for the nod! I dont think he would disclose anything to anyone that he not happy for public consumption and perhaps I should read more between the lines, but here is this mornings reply to a question regards the latest round of what are they up to's! lol

just got the nod!


Dear XXXXX,

I don't have a problem with you posting my reply. I've nothing to hide and it's content is what I would tell anyone who asked.

Best wishes,
Barry

Dear xxxxx

Thanks for your email. I hope you're well.

I've tried to be consistent in answering queries from shareholders by email or at the phone. The risk in speaking to everyone who calls, is that comments I make may be misconstrued, misunderstood or repeated as sound-bites and therefore repeated out of context. But still, I'd rather speak to any shareholder who takes the time and trouble to call me than simply ignore them.

I've been asked if I care about shareholders. Of course I do, every one of them. But if asked what is my top priority, then I will answer "the Company", because that is my primary obligation as a director and if I fail in that regard, then shareholders suffer as a result.

If asked why the Company is not informing shareholders about every aspect of its business, then I'll reply with "we are not obligated to do so, but we will make every effort to release information that (a) is material, (b) is not confidential, and (c) will not prejudice any action contemplated or in progress". Such a response can be interpreted as meaning we are purposefully withholding information that could be released, or planning some sort of underhand activity, which is simply not true.

If asked what will the share price be on listing, or at the end of the year, or in two to three years time, I'll reply with something along the lines of "the market will determine the share price from time to time, but we can influence the market by delivering positive results, so it all depends on how we do. If none of the core-tech is producing good income within two to three years, and all we have to show for our efforts is a steady growth in our existing and extended product portfolio, then the SP may be around the 20-30p mark. If any of the core-techs produce results, then we should be at a big multiple to this range."

As for rumours and innuendo about purposefully running the Company into the ground in order for ATEK, me, Gary or any combination thereof buying the Company or its assets on the cheap, they're nonsense and entirely illogical. If our shareholders support the SCLN, then they will have security over all of the Company's assets and in the worst possible scenario it will be they that have ownership of the Company's assets.

I've had emailed to me some posts claiming we'll take the cash from the SCLN, spend it, see the SP fall to 1p and then buy up all the shares! How would that work then? The logic or such a proposition says we would buy all of the shares in a company that is broke and whose assets are owned by participants in the SCLN. I may be from the Fens, but I'm not so dumb as to buy a worthless asset, knowing it to be worthless.

Best wishes,
Barry

kok

Barry

Might you pop up here, threaten to sue, then disappear up your own arsehole, as I believe the better informed shareholders on here might speculate? Would it be your own arsehole because of the rumours that Tabby's is too jammed pack with pineapples?

Perhaps you or kevin might respond?

from reading t's previous posts and comments BJM does SEEM genuine, and as t said,without BJM the rabbit would have no hat and all shareholders would be without hope. so here once again is my question which i keep asking and to which i seem never to be able to receive an answer to, where are and when are we to receive the final audited accounts? and who is this 2 mil that will be repaid from the 6 mil fundraising owed to? it is clearly stated, not hidden in small print,it just isn't stated in detail the breakdown details of the creditors. who are they? as i have stated in a previous post i have my suspicions but i could be wrong.
anyway if he is truly and not just SEEMINGLY genuine he will find the will and the way and the time to return to our board and respond to all outstanding unanswered posts,as tabby was/is sure he would do. so lets try to give the benefit of the doubt whilst keeping our money firmly in our pockets until such time as we see those final audited acounts.
i'm just trying to be fair.
putting aside any of my personal views or opinions. is requesting to see the final fully audited accounts before making a decision to invest or reinvest further an unreasonable request? or is it a sensible thing to do? (end)
why would a board ask or expect such a thing from it's shareholders? surely if there is nothing to hide it shouldn't should it? but then thats just my opinion.so where are those final fully audited accounts showing all where that 2 mil of the new 6 mil investment is immediately going to? perhaps BJM might like to respond and assure everyone that not one penny of it is going his way, either directly or indirectly, or if it is then declaring openly exactly how much. that would surely go a long way to satisfying some of his doubters. it's not hard to do.
regards
jkd

Dil,

A typical comment from the other side.
-----------------------------------------

figure6 - 14 May'09 - 17:24 - 1958 of 2071

This is an important sensitive time for MDX and the greater good (mdx survival)
is more important than free speech here.

This seems to suggest the accounts will be released AFTER the CLN has been completed!

Why am I not surprised?

---------


meercat - 17 May'09 - 11:50 - 2136 of 2152


Don't have to talk about future legal matters endlessly, here is what is important now...
email from Barry yesterday - I asked him when etc....
Dear ----,

The body of the note is just about finalised and this weekend I'll be working on the attachments: Chairman's letter, Disclosure Letter and Debenture. So with any luck it will be distributed this coming week.

A general update about progress and a specific update about technologies will be in the Chairman's letter. The audited accounts for 2008 and possibly restated accounts for 2007 (I say possibly because it may be easier/cheaper to make the restatement as a post Dec 31 2007 balance sheet event) will be finalised and distributed as soon as we have funds from the loan note to do so.

Thanks for your kind words.

Best wishes,
Barry

'Thanks Barry'

Well if he published the results before the CLN he'd have no chance of getting it away, but having said that he's very cleverly put the onus on shareholders who's only chance of getting anything back is to risk even more capital. Personally I'd write it off and forget about it.