Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-conservative-leadership-election-michael-gove-brexit-next-tory-leader-a7118836.html

Conservative leadership election: Poll finds Theresa May most popular candidate, even among Leave voters

Around 64 per cent of Leave voters have a positive opinion of Home Secretary

Theresa May is the most popular candidate in the Conservative Party leadership race - even among leave voters, a poll has revealed.

The Home Secretary, who backed the Remain campaign in the run-up to the EU referendum, is also the most well-known of the contenders fo the Tory crown, according to the YouGov poll published Saturday.

Members of the public were asked whether or not they knew enough about each of the leadership candidates to be able to give an opinion, and those who did were asked to say whether their opinion was positive, negative or neutral. They were also asked how they voted in the EU referendum on 23 June.

Haze.

When it comes to the tory leadership election the majority of the public think of it as buying a pig in a poke.

Oik, oik.

cynic , you are a liar you still never answered grans question .
you never answer any question just abuse .
I post facts

AS FOR MAY SHE IS A GUTLESS LIAR AND IS NOT A LEADER A LEADER WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN SILENT ON THE EU . SHE SAID NOTHING DID NOTHING AND IN HER JOB AS DONE NOTHING , SHE IS A DUD
AND WILL NOT GET OUR VOTES AT THE NEXT ELECTION WOULD SOONER VOTE LAB

Before the tory rat fight vote for PM is taken, are we going to see the "candidates'" tax returns and lists of overseas "investments"?

Duplicity comes to mind.

Poll of Conservative members who will vote on last 2 candidates and choose leader. May is ahead on every item.

Are people banging on about Andrea Leadsome's finance experience seriously saying what the country needs right now is to be led by a banker?

What was the sample size of conservative voters?

Not Conservative voters. The 150,000 members who will vote on leader.

About 1,000 sample of Conservative members. Figures so clear that margins of error do not apply. Statistically it is a very good sample.

https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/dgak27s1eh/TimesResults_160704_ConservativeMembers.pdf

You have nothing to worry about then.

The Conservative MPs (only) vote to put up the final 2 candidates from the list of 5 Tory MPs who put themselves up to be chosen as Leader of the party (and PM) for the leadership election.

A final vote to find the Leader is then held within the Conservative Party Membership as a whole. Voting powers here being limited to those members who have been members of the party for more than 3 months.

PS. It costs £25 to join as a Single Member (or £2.09 per month) under Standard Membership

The clue to the care taken is in the question "would best understand the economy"- they must be taking the Michael or it shows how much the average Tory MP knows about the economy.
Andrea is streets ahead when it comes to the economy. She was not a "Banker" although she worked in senior positions for banks, the last position being in Corporate Governance ie keeping "The Bankers" in line. She was economic secretary to the Treasury until moving to Minister of State for Energy.
Theresa studied Geography and worked at the Bank of England for about 12 years after University (job unknown, possibly counting money, does that make her a banker?), then as a financial consultant for a further 12 years. Bit young to be a consultant but you know what they say.
Either could do the job but Andrea has the X factor. You look at Theresa and feel like taking a holiday.

Ken Clarke has said he will vote tactically for Crabb to keep Brexiteers off the ballot and then switch to May. I suspect many Conservative MPs may do that.

Bitter old sod.

Sounds like a good idea. Exactly the same thing happened to him when he stood for leader in 2005 and he took it very well. It is called politics.

http://news.sky.com/story/1721982/watch-ken-clarke-ridicules-tory-candidates

Does anybody with an once of common sense take a blind bit of notice
what ken clarke splutters from his hush puppy mouth..

He's the Tory's John Prescott...Looks like they've been hitting the bottle
continuously for their adult life...

Is it only haystack who gives a shit who or what runs the tory sinking ship??.

I see no signs of it being a sinking ship. Once there is a new leader we will be up and away. The Conservatives' problems are temporary, Labour's are more existential.

Branson had a meeting with May last week to ask for a second referendum.

From The Guardian at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jul/04/andrea-leadsom-tory-leadership-brexit-campaigner

Andrea Leadsom’s pitch for the Tory leadership: our writers’ verdict
Andrea Leadsom at her leadership campaign launch on 4 July. In her speech the Brexit campaigner outlined her vision for the Conservatives and country. How successful was she?

Jonathan Freedland, Simon Jenkins and Deborah Orr
Monday 4 July 2016 13.00 BST Last modified on Tuesday 5 July 2016 07.24 BST

Jonathan Freedland: If the Tory voting pattern holds, she’ll be leader

For a moment, you had to wonder if Andrea Leadsom was announcing her bid to succeed Nigel Farage, the freshly resigned leader of Ukip. Her opening pitch was a leave message so orthodox that the words could have been written by Farage himself. The EU had been “stifling” Britain; there could be no going back from the 23 June vote; freedom of movement must end, allowing parliament to get a grip on immigration. There could be no ifs or buts, no dithering about triggering article 50. Britain would leave the EU and “we will have our freedom back”.

That’s what you’d have expected, an attack on Theresa May from the right. But Leadsom’s offer was not just one note. She moved to May’s left when she promised to “guarantee the rights” of those EU citizens who are already living and working in the UK. She would not use them as “bargaining chips” in any negotiation, she said – making a direct contrast with the home secretary. Remember that May, perhaps in order to reassure Tory members worried by her support of remain, has suggested the status of EU nationals in Britain might be up for grabs.

But Leadsom staked out more terrain on the left. Workers’ rights previously guaranteed by the EU would be safe and even “enhanced”. Top boardroom pay was often undeserved and needed to be reined in. If there was money to give away, it would go on tax cuts for the lowest paid: “The richest people in Britain will not be my priority.”

Sure, some of that may raise a few eyebrows, given that Leadsom, a former banker, voted against a tax on bankers’ bonuses, the proceeds of which would have helped young people get into work and contributed towards the building of affordable homes.

But it was canny positioning. Keen to avoid being branded the Ukip candidate to succeed David Cameron, she sought to be the One Nation candidate instead.

Will it work? It shouldn’t. Leadsom has a tenth of May’s experience and bears the mark of Cain formed by the words “former banker”. But in every contest since 1997, Tory members have chosen the candidate perceived as most hostile to the EU – regardless of electoral appeal or experience. If that pattern holds, Leadsom will be our next prime minister.

Simon Jenkins: She’s eerily reminiscent of Thatcher, circa 1974

“The referendum is final. It must be respected and I will respect it.” If Andrea Leadsom’s bid to be next prime minister succeeds, it will be for one reason. Such is the suspicion of the Tory party that her rival, Theresa May, is a closet trimmer, they will take the last true Brexiter standing. With Boris Johnson gone and Michael Gove limping, she is the one to drive a stake through Britain’s EU membership and bury it at the crossroads with garlic in its mouth. The bloodsuckers of Brussels will depart. “We want to be free.”

Leadsom’s performance was eerily reminiscent of the young Margaret Thatcher in 1974, when she too challenged the grey suits of the Tory party and took it by storm. There was the same tilt of the head, the same slightly forced smile, the same confidence in mouthing the cliched necessities of politics. (Margaret Thatcher was elected leader of the Conservative Party in 1975, and in 1979 became prime minister)

And there was steel. Leadsom clearly regards Theresa May as potentially weak on EU negotiation. She wants to press ahead with renegotiation, with a cross-party team if possible. “This has been the biggest event since the fall of the Berlin Wall,” she said. Cheap labour would end. “We are choosing freedom from stifling EU institutions. We are no longer bound by that model. We will have our freedom back.”

On other topics there was the new populism. There was a distinctive side, a Gove-like attack on boardroom pay: “The richest people in Britain will not be my priority.” Workers’ rights would be protected and enhanced, as would the national living wage.

Leadsom claimed to “know how to succeed in a man’s world”. She went out of her way to plead for more support for young families in difficulties. “My commitment is to the emotional health of the nation.”

For all that, Leadsom’s brief career in politics, and even briefer in government, has hardly been remarkable. As for how her view of Brexit as an “economic disaster” three years ago had become the “huge opportunity” of today, it was of course a matter of context. But that, of course, was a twist that Thatcher also took on her march to glory. If not leader, Leadsom clearly marked her card as a coming oligarch of the new Tory party.

Deborah Orr: She reminds me of Blair. Except he believed his own rhetoric

That’s nice. Andrea Leadsom wants to be prime minister because she loves us. And our European friends. The EU had been stifling Leadsom’s career, which has now taken a turn for the better. She’s got her freedom back. And ours. Apart from our freedom of movement. She doesn’t want us to have that. She is going to build a Greater Britain. One without Scotland. Though not if Leadsom has her way.

Leadsom thinks it’ll be great, now we can sack politicians more easily. The Labour party is particularly glad about this. The Tories would prefer to have the power to keep theirs. Because of love. Lots of love. We haven’t stopped loving our families and our children. Just the families and children of people who weren’t born here.

Leadsom is fed up with rich people, people who work in financial services. They will not be her priority. That’s why she first worked in financial services, then joined the Conservative party. It was all done out of love – love for the poor, who will be getting lots of support to build houses, if they have the money to do so. What with the EU having banned building houses. Or something.

Social justice is Leadsom’s passion. Despite loving the people of this country, she’s going to concentrate on intervening to stop people bringing up their kids really badly. It’s not poverty that stops them, of course. It’s ignorance. People need to be taught about aspiration, tolerance and hope. She reminds me of Tony Blair, except that at least he started out believing his own sentimental rhetoric.

Leadsom was fine when she was making stuff up, unencumbered by any challenge. So she answered questions by saying that things would all be fine once we were out of the EU. Because she’s an expert, with all the facts at her fingertips. This is exactly the sort of thing leave campaigners wanted us to distrust. Leadsom also thinks the Conservative manifesto will be fine until 2020. These Brexiters lose a lot of their enthusiasm for democracy and The People once they’ve got their feet under a powerful table.

Other papers a very anti Andrea.