Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

Dubious sell-off     

ellio - 15 May 2006 09:10

The market seems to be selling-off on the back of limited bad news imo, apart from the dollar that is.

If you can hold your nerve and apart from any short term requirements to offload poor performing stocks, I have a couple!!, my advice would be sit tight. This does not have the feel of the tech(mining!) bubble at all. Difference being there are a lot of good fundamentals, unlike in 2000 when there were a lot of over rated nothing companies.

Strawbs - 31 Jul 2007 13:20 - 724 of 1564

That's fair enough. At least I'm consistant. :-) My reasoning is that you can't predict when momentum will switch significantly negative, but you can see the potential of a big correction that may cause significant losses. So far these corrections have bounced and moved higher. I believe eventually the bounce won't arrive, and people will loose a lot of money. I also believe that my locked in profits will average out (even at what I agree is a poor interest rate) a far better return than staying in uncertain markets.

If you can monitor the markets all day and move in and out as appropriate, then you have a lot more free time than I do.

My postings are merely an opinion or observation that some may find useful and others will choose to ignore. I won't be telling anyone "I told you so", nor as far as I'm aware have I ever done so to date.

Strawbs.

cynic - 31 Jul 2007 13:23 - 725 of 1564

i have no dispute with you Stawbs as well you know, but I am sure history has proved that even if one invested a week before the Great Crash, the immedaite losses were made good within quite a short time and of course stocks have consistently outperformed cash for decades

HARRYCAT - 31 Jul 2007 13:38 - 726 of 1564

Interesting statement from Worldspreads today:

"The markets are at the moment poised to make an extremely slow return, gaining back half of what the indices lost last week is not expected to happen until September assuming the fallout of the US subprime and credit crunch has elapsed."

Which presumably means that the markets won't pick up until after the summer break (which is hardly news), but at least, by implication, they expect an 'Up' movement as opposed to a 'down' one.

cynic - 31 Jul 2007 13:42 - 727 of 1564

their guess is prob no better than ours! ..... in any case, who would have predicted the strong showing yesterday and today ..... 20/20 hindsight makes me rue (slightly) that i took a good profit on the Dow about 100 pts back but still ..... today my fear would be (is!) whether this bounce is too hard too fast and will bring on another sharp correction

Strawbs - 31 Jul 2007 13:46 - 728 of 1564

Over long periods it will average out better than cash. But if you made say 250% in equities over 3 years (during a boom), then 5% in cash over the next four (during a downturrn), I think your overall average in and out of the market will still be higher. All down to timing and how you do the maths I suppose. You also have a fairly constant "cash value", where as in the markets you may have stellar returns for 3 years, negative returns for 4 years, average out OK, but be restricted as to where and when you can access your "pot".

My investment stratergy has always revolved around being in the markets when interest rates are very low (because it stimulates growth, which should be good for companies/spending) and out when rates are high (relatively speaking, because it constrains growth/spending). At the moment I think rates are high when you consider the levels of debt, and I suspect continued inflation, particularly in commodities.

I'm sure I read something by Schwartz (the market historian) who was saying that recent history is actually showing negative returns in the markets. If you invested at the peak of the tech bubble, I guess you'd still be averaging a negative return, even worse when inflation is factored in.

Strawbs.

HARRYCAT - 31 Jul 2007 13:48 - 729 of 1564

I feel sure that many people are playing this current bounce & will take profits soon. BoE rate review thurs. My money is on another bounce down towards the end of the week.

jimmy b - 31 Jul 2007 13:49 - 730 of 1564

A big step back at some point today cynic (the dow), that's the problem (i bought it before hours and closed it again) ,where do you put your stop,,now knowing my luck it will be a smooth ride up.

cynic - 31 Jul 2007 13:53 - 731 of 1564

pure gut feel ...... i bought at 12258, being just about on a support line and held my breath ..... once i was decently in profit, i put in a trailing stop at 12275 and then 12295 and finally, about 30 mins before the bell at 12335 ..... this got hit, but then of course the market strated on its upward track once more ...... btw, i don't actually (usually) day-trade though this happened to work out that way ..... a decent profit is exactly that and is easily frittered away.

today
i suppose a brave call is short ..... but i haven't done it!

jimmy b - 31 Jul 2007 13:59 - 732 of 1564

Lets see ,, i think long ,maybe a big leg back during the session , but a close above 13500 ,i'll be going long if it drops 50/60 pts .

jimmy b - 31 Jul 2007 20:07 - 733 of 1564

Your shorts looking good as i write cynic ,,i didn't go long when it took a step back ,far to volatile for me, +20 to -50 in about 10 minutes i think.

cynic - 31 Jul 2007 20:37 - 734 of 1564

i didn't do anything either .... far too scary though as it happens short was the correct call if you could have held your nerve

HARRYCAT - 31 Jul 2007 22:12 - 735 of 1564

Summary of quote:

"The gains in the U.S. were erased after American Home Mortgage, provider of loans to borrowers without top-rated credit, said $450 million to $500 million of loans probably won't get funded.

Oil's climb to a one-year high above $78 a barrel drove the retreat.

Financial shares also turned lower after investor Jeremy Grantham said up to half of all hedge funds may close in the next five years.

American Home Mortgage plummeted $9.43, or 90%, to $1.04. The lender, whose shares stopped trading at $10.47 yesterday after it disclosed a cash shortage, has been cut off from credit and didn't have money yesterday to make $300 million of mortgages it had already agreed to provide, the Melville, New York-based company said today in a statement."

On top of that, Apple has said it's iPhone is not selling well!

It doesn't seem to take much these days to send the indexes into a spin.

Strawbs - 31 Jul 2007 22:45 - 736 of 1564

AFX: AHM on verge on bankruptcy

Edited........ I should've read the article all the way through, thought they where a non subprime lender, but sounds like Alt-A is similar if not necessarily the same.... :-)

Strawbs.

steveo - 01 Aug 2007 08:12 - 737 of 1564

I heard word that there will be yet another US sub-prime lender going to the wall this week, albeit for a relatively small $800 million. If true will not help sentiment uch.

alanatml2 - 01 Aug 2007 10:31 - 738 of 1564

This whole sell off business has been caused by the greed of the banks increasing the interest rates. So there is one answer to the problem. Get back to stable low interest rates.

cynic - 01 Aug 2007 10:43 - 739 of 1564

absolute rubbish!

1) markets have been going up, with some corrections en route, for a long time and this cannot last for ever.
2) the sub-prime lending problem in US is potentially very serious especially if some of the hedge funds start to feel the heat and at best have to start unloading stocks, or at worst, fold
3) the latest sub-prime lender in trouble, as reported late yesterday, is seemingly no tiddler

how can you then be surprised that the markets catch fright?

how far and for how long they will fall is currently anyone's guess, though chartists will tell you that Dow could easily fall another 250 points (12750) and quite possibly 1100 points (12000).

old and tried and tested adage says that when Wall Street sneezes, the rest of the world catches a cold.

HARRYCAT - 01 Aug 2007 12:28 - 740 of 1564

Looks like another 'down' day for the DOW.
Are you shorting the index, cynic?
jimmyB was right about a big step back yesterday, but it's getting more & more difficult to predict, imo.

cynic - 01 Aug 2007 12:32 - 741 of 1564

Harry ..... go to TA thread and all will be revealed! .... in fact i closed at a very tasty profit at about 08:30 this morning .... could have done better, but hardly griping ..... Dow opening now showing almost neutral having been forecast earlier as much as 120 points down since last night

HARRYCAT - 01 Aug 2007 12:40 - 742 of 1564

O.K. Thanks.
Am going to sit on my hands this afternoon, so that I am not tempted to push any buttons! Much too difficult to call, imo.

alanatml2 - 01 Aug 2007 15:34 - 743 of 1564

Cynic is one of the herd and have heard only the official line which continues to be regurgitated to create volatility in the markets. Without volatility the financial sectors would not 'make' fantastic salaries, so it is to their benefit to create uncertainty through the official announcements. So what if a few hedge funds with super-high-risk strategies go under for a few $100M. The market has just taken $90billion out of circulation. Surely the immense global banking system can get these 'get rich quick merchants' with virtual assets under control. Taiwan has just started a review to find out if the local market will be affected by US sub-prime lending problems - they just don't know.

Interest rates were increased 5 times in UK to address the so called rising inflation indexes. However the UK government can reduce inflation at a stroke by reducing stealth and windfall taxes in all sectors. This includes all regulatory payments introduced into every aspect of British life to pay for over-government and vast armies of civil servants which (in their own words) are not fit for purpose.

Is this a real crash coming or another 'wave' to ride? The financial gurus better get to grips with these situations before we have a tsunami.
Register now or login to post to this thread.