Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

jimmy b - 20 Jul 2016 09:44 - 72753 of 81564

Haystack ,not if they have huge immigration come 2020 that's a fact .

cynic - 20 Jul 2016 09:54 - 72754 of 81564

tories may well win the next GE, but whether on merit or by default because the labour party is seen as a total disaster with hard-left corbyn at the helm
time and actuality will tell

Fred1new - 20 Jul 2016 09:55 - 72755 of 81564

Dil,

Congratulate your daughter.

You will have to ask her for help!

jimmy b - 20 Jul 2016 10:00 - 72756 of 81564

By 2020 you would think the Labour party would have sorted its self out ,we need a strong opposition , so i hope that's the case . If we are lied to (whatever Haystack thinks) they will not win a GE ,you will also get huge votes from various regions of the UK for UKIP .

VICTIM - 20 Jul 2016 10:04 - 72757 of 81564

Labour may have split by then and could call themselves New Labour , or something .

cynic - 20 Jul 2016 10:08 - 72758 of 81564

one day you'll admit to yourself that all politicians lie to a greater or lesser extent regardless of party
there is no question that parliament and the country deserve a credible opposition regardless of who is holding the reins
viewed dispassionately, corbyn is clearly not a man cut out to be a leader ..... his pathetic support of "remain" which was the clear wish of the labour party, says it all

Haystack - 20 Jul 2016 10:26 - 72759 of 81564

The immigration will be the same as now. It will take years to control it. They have removed the specific targets as they are currently impossible. May will still win if immigration is the same as now.

VICTIM - 20 Jul 2016 10:31 - 72760 of 81564

I am a Dalek , I am a Dalek .

Haystack - 20 Jul 2016 10:35 - 72761 of 81564

Theresa May does not need a GE or a party election. The Conservative government was elected by virtue of having more MPs elected. The public did not elect the PM. She is still bound by the same manifesto that the public voted for. She doesn't need a GE unless she plans major changes to the manifesto.

jimmy b - 20 Jul 2016 10:35 - 72762 of 81564

Haystack do you really think that the 17.5 million people would vote her in if immigration is at current levels ? do you remember the Major days and how it ended ? you seem to think the Tories are the b all and end all ,they are not .

jimmy b - 20 Jul 2016 10:35 - 72763 of 81564

We are talking 2020 not now .

Haystack - 20 Jul 2016 10:42 - 72764 of 81564

I am expecting Corbyn to win and then to watch Labour tear itself apart subsequently. If Corbyn wins, the troops won't serve. Any attempts to deselect MPs won't have any effect until a GE. But it will make them split from official Labour. MPs do not have to trigger by-elections when the give up the ship, so they are safe until a GE.

Of course, if Corbyn loses then it will be more bloody with the party members and Momentum going crazy. They will attempt to deselect all those who were opposed to Corbyn. It is difficult to decide which version will be more entertaining.

MaxK - 20 Jul 2016 11:10 - 72765 of 81564

We are not talking about the PCP, we are talking about the party rank and file membership.

Who exactly was consulted about TM's appointment?

cynic - 20 Jul 2016 11:18 - 72766 of 81564

seemingly the rules did not require it in a one horse race

so, rather than dealing with history (take lessons from fred on that), what is your view on the likelihood of TM making a strong fist of the job?

VICTIM - 20 Jul 2016 11:20 - 72767 of 81564

On the other hand MaxK who in all honesty is capable or wants to do it .

cynic - 20 Jul 2016 11:21 - 72768 of 81564

honesty linked to politics makes an interesting oxymoron :-)

MaxK - 20 Jul 2016 11:29 - 72769 of 81564

Not sure c, but it frankly doesent look good.

Lets see what she brings back from the fuhrer.

cynic - 20 Jul 2016 11:29 - 72770 of 81564

a puff from ADVFN as below
Fine Wine investment has enjoyed a shot in the arm from the referendum vote.
Prices had already grown a very healthy 9% in the first 6 months of 2016, but have leapt up a further 5.5% in the short 4 weeks since the vote.


what a load of bollocks as anyone who buys fine wines will tell you

there is indeed a lot of money to be made by investing in the very best bordeaux (no more than a dozen of those + even fewer burgundies) and in the very best vintages, but there is quite a lot of luck involved in choosing the best vintages, as it is not usually apparent until a few years after release

iturama - 20 Jul 2016 13:08 - 72771 of 81564

You may be struck off your doctor's list if you don't visit within 5 years. This happened to me since I rarely visited my doctor. I had to reregister. Now they have set up a complicated procedure of writing to patients after 5 years, with red letters etc.
This is to avoid paying doctors the 136 pounds per year for ghost patients. Given the long waiting periods for doctor appointments, it would be a better idea to pay the annual fee for the actual patients that were seen each year. Maybe less people will be then referred to the hospital out-patients.

Fred1new - 20 Jul 2016 13:49 - 72772 of 81564

That would depend on reviewal parameters.

? The same fee for a patient reviewed at monthly or weekly etc..

Does that £136 take into consideration of peripheral staff and buildings into consideration?

Seems a hell of a lot!
Register now or login to post to this thread.