required field
- 03 Feb 2016 10:00
Thought I'd start a new thread as this is going to be a major talking point this year...have not made up my mind yet...(unlike bucksfizz)....but thinking of voting for an exit as Europe is not doing Britain any good at all it seems....
iturama
- 15 Aug 2017 14:06
- 7284 of 12628
Not at all Hilary. More along the lines of "great minds think alike". :)
You are very virtuous Mademoiselle but don't forget the wisdom that comes with age. Your children will grow up and be you in 20 years time or so. Will their ideas be the same then?
Personally, I prefer to think in terms of the benefits of Brexit, rather than the consequences. Sure there will be some inconveniences and some in the EU will try to maximise those but nothing to compare with the inconveniences my father suffered at Dunkirk due to certain EU members ambitions and failures.
Anyhow, the deed is done and we have to get on with it and make it a success.
cynic
- 15 Aug 2017 16:59
- 7285 of 12628
i shall post very bitchily below about the brotherhood switzerland clearly shares with the other eu member states
and yes, hilary likes to think of herself as an eu citizen, though she's certainly very happy to be a uk tax exile as a swiss resident - switzerland of course being outside eu and merely a member of efta
==================
A Swiss village, one of the wealthiest in Europe, has refused to take in its government imposed quota of asylum seekers, voting to pay a fine of £200,000 instead.
The residents of Oberwil-Lieli, where there are 300 millionaires among a population of 2,200, voted “no” in a referendum over whether to accept just 10 refugees.
hilary
- 15 Aug 2017 17:10
- 7286 of 12628
And the residents of the multi-million pound residential development in K&C which was going to be used to house Grenfell tower victims were welcoming of their new neighbours with open arms?
cynic
- 15 Aug 2017 17:11
- 7287 of 12628
no, but they did and one must assume that the grenfell "refugees" are now comfortably ensconced there
hilary
- 15 Aug 2017 17:19
- 7288 of 12628
Because they didn't have much choice in the matter. The residents of Oberwil-Lieli did have a choice, and they exercised their rights. And so they should.
I wouldn't expect to buy a house and have a bunch of asylum seekers move in next door, and I suggest that anybody who pretends they think differently is telling porkies.
cynic
- 15 Aug 2017 17:25
- 7289 of 12628
oh i see; not like your brothers in eu then?
seems to me that have very cleverly "bought" yourself the best of both worlds as an irish/switzer
are you not being just a tad hypocritical or even sanctimonious?
hilary
- 15 Aug 2017 17:36
- 7291 of 12628
are you not being just a tad hypocritical or even sanctimonious?
I thought I'd been very careful not to disclose how I felt about Brexit. Are you reading something between the lines that I never wrote?
cynic
- 15 Aug 2017 18:37
- 7292 of 12628
heaven forfend!
to be honest, i thought your feelings on brexit had been broadcast pretty loud and clear
i hope you are not also one of those who'ld campaign for a 2nd referendum primarily because you did not like the result of the first
hilary
- 15 Aug 2017 19:38
- 7293 of 12628
So you did add 2 plus 2 and got 5.
I asked a couple of questions, tried to get some sensible answers, and I'm accused of being a Remoaner??!!?? Seriously, I voted because I had a vote, but I couldn't care less whether you stay or leave the EU because I took steps some time back to mitigate my position.
As things go (and I never thought I'd say this), but I'm inclined to side with Fred and Stan. :o)
cynic
- 15 Aug 2017 19:41
- 7294 of 12628
whatever
i merely asked you a question
personally, i would never ever want to live in switzerland, despite its welcoming of uk tax asylum seekers
hilary
- 15 Aug 2017 19:52
- 7295 of 12628
personally, i would never ever want to live in switzerland
Phew. That's a relief.
MaxK
- 15 Aug 2017 21:16
- 7296 of 12628
hilly, you are a remoaner, no doubt!
Still, that's your position and you are free to argue it.
What you are not fee to do, is negate it: It was a free vote, and you lost..get over it!
hilary
- 15 Aug 2017 21:30
- 7297 of 12628
hilly, you are a remoaner, no doubt!
Somebody else who has trouble understanding English. What part of 'I asked a couple of questions, tried to get some sensible answers, and I'm accused of being a Remoaner' exactly was too difficult for you to understand?
What you are not fee to do, is negate it. you lost..get over it
Well, given that I exited the UK before this mess happened, I'm not the one who needs to negate it exactly, and I'm not entirely sure what it is that I'm supposed to have lost. But, for someone who 'won', how is it that your glorious leader, Maggie May, seems to be making such a fcuk up of something so simple?
Just curious, I'm sure you'll understand.
Dil
- 15 Aug 2017 23:42
- 7298 of 12628
hils your post earlier about not wanting to buy a house and then have a bunch of asylum seekers move in next door .... isn't that what happens already in the UK but you can also add a bunch of free loading EU citizens / criminals into the mix too.
I knew you felt the same way as us really :-)
Dil
- 15 Aug 2017 23:46
- 7299 of 12628
As for 74% of 18-24 voting in then talking to my kids mates and the youngsters at the pub that's probably about the same reaction I got but the big problem was most of those I talked to didn't bother vote.
Best guess is maybe 25% of them voted if that.
Fred1new
- 16 Aug 2017 07:58
- 7300 of 12628
Max,
You say the "remoaners" have lost. Ummmm.
But tell me exactly what have the Brexiters won.
To vote for something, which hasn't been specified and little knowledge of possible consequences of, strikes me as close to insanity or stupidity.
The Brexiters when they voted behaved like kids being offered sweets out of a bag in the dark.
Ie. optimistic suckers.
Like going to the chemist with a headache and grabbing and swallowing the first pill they can see off the shelf and left wondering why they are spending the rest of the week S------ themselves.
-=-=-=-=-=
Fred1new
- 16 Aug 2017 08:00
- 7301 of 12628
hilary
- 16 Aug 2017 08:52
- 7302 of 12628
Dil,
The comment about the house....
I'm pretty confident that the main reason asylum seekers and other illegal immigrants go to the UK en masse is because they think they'll be given a home and benefits which they can't get elsewhere. In France you can't claim benefits of any kind, or access their healthcare system, until you've contributed into the system for 4 years. They congregate in Calais because they know they'll get something in the UK.
Martini said previously that he wanted an accountable UK government. Well you've already got an accountable UK government. Why haven't they changed the law previously to stop giving the handouts so freely? And why not build a detention centre in the Hebrides for illegals and asylum seekers (that's what happens in Australia)?
Surely, with no prospect of work, no prospect of a home and benefits, and the risk of being detained in the backend of nowhere would be a deterrent? You don't need to leave the EU for that.
Which leads me on to the eastern European part of the question...
I thought that UK border control did do criminal record checks on EU residents. And as for eastern European benefits tourism, a change in the UK law along the lines above would prevent that. What you can't do, however, is stop EU citizens going to the UK to work and pay taxes.
hilary
- 16 Aug 2017 08:58
- 7303 of 12628
Dil,
Regarding the low turnout of 18-24 year olds....
I read somewhere that the turnout was thought to be 36%. The margin of 'victory' for leave over remain was 1.2m votes. Had the youngsters turned out to vote at the same levels as they did in this year's general election, and assuming the 74% figure of those voting to remain is correct, and was extrapolated, then the remain camp would have won.