for more information about stanelco click on the links.

driver's research page link
http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=7681#lastread
website link
http://www.stanelco.co.uk/index.htm

That did not rhyme at all Driver !!
Baza

that 80k looks like a sell to me, so its a perfectly balanced mm book again, which suggests another gentle slide today heading for the 20p tomorrow,it`s attrition by
inaction- unless some of the "SEO lovers" e.g. `masterbraindead` buy some- and there is as much chance of that ,as him buying any of the dozen penny dreadfuls he ramps, the rampers are locked in at 30p+, and it ` aint returning there again, much as they try

ps why do you think Master Bates was banned from a MAM rival?

What, knocking SEO
Now just a sec
By gum, he's got some
Flippin' neck
PM may like a bit of ramp
But Sequie's like a squib that's damp
Fair's fair to mention con's and pro's
But where is Eric's balanced prose?

Anon - an' on, an' on!

As a matter of interest (assuming you are employed), what sort of employer allows you lot to ---------
1. Use their equipment to waste time and energy posting all day
2. Neglect your work with such gay abandon
3. Employ you at all

Pleeeaaase! don`t tell ,we the tax paying public that you are Public Service Employees, oh and if you are get back to work--NOW!,
If you are employed by Plc`s /Ltd. Cos,do name the firms so we can ensure we sell their shares, such frivolity smacks of poor, indeed NO management.

not seen eric much these days.
maybe he's enjoying the summer haze
and the lazy ways
of old age.
i picture him now on the patio,
sipping his rioja
as he rocks on his rocker,
pondering the call on his margin
for his friend s e o.

Et tu, non-Sequitor! MYOB IMHO DYOR

bos - elegaic isn't the word for it, lol!

sd

bollox probably is ,though :)

no reply then- unemployed and in the public library, seems about right.

Me - happilky semi retired - working from home in my spare time.

God knows how I ever found time to do a full time job.

Serious question.

If SEO were to do a deal with WalMart - would the announcement be in the UK at 0700 or in the states at 1430 BST ?

Baza

bhunt-I never doubted your credentials, same meself, retired at 50 and have never done a stroke of "work", (well a wee bit of consultancy work occasionally), since;
worked hard before that tho`-probably put as many constructive hrs. (away from home too)- in, as some do sticking it out to 65.

07.00 to answer a serious question for once!

I suppose Stanelco would announce at 7 and Walmart at 14.30? So both?

Thanks PT - Is that because SEO is registered in UK ?

Baza

i'm not too sure,baza, simply because they have already made a few announcements in usa but not here. i hope proptrade is right, though, and we get it first!!

indeed. a deal of that size would naturally be announced here because of the price sensitive nature and the fact that it would be just plain weird to let Wal Mart steal the thunder of a deal or reduce the impact in any way. 07.00 is the key time and any positive announcement is made then for maximum impact. This would be an SEO announcement first and a Wal Mart update and editorial style RNS.

rgds
PT

also , can anyone expand on cyrils post about todays supposed presentation by aquasol, frogpack, etc?

Bosley Hi,

The summary of todays presentation from 'allwashedup' on FYB ....

http://www.fillyaboots.com/f7/forum_posts.asp?TID=1921&PN=0&TPN=15

My reply to it is at the bottom of that page.

Cheers,
PM

ROTFLMFAO-fillyaboots- the intelligent punters bible

hahahahahahahahah, the name says it all, and oh look there is a bloke saying that 50p is coming, jaysus they must all be clones of masterballs.

reading that , i am guessing it was a presentation to potential clients , rather than city types?

I thought that I would ask Howard White at SEO for his opinion on the timing of any announcement - UK or US - this is his response - predicatable I guess - but nevertheless impressed that I got an answer within 30 minutes - and I only addressed my query to investor relations mailbox:

"Hypothetically it would depend on the nature of the tranasction to be announced and wether it was deemed significant enough to require an RNS.

Thank you for your continued interest and support,

Regards,

howard White"