Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

TMC...One of the miners that hasnt bounced yet (TMC)     

siwel2 - 17 Feb 2006 10:17

Interesting little company. Did a series of asset swops to leave them with half of the 4th largest Nickel deposit in the world.
The deposit itself is in the Philippines has been known about for 30 years but due to low prices and lack of demand in the Far East it was never exploited. With the explosion in demand from India and China the nickel price has climbed from $2 to $6.50 but oddly enough is still considered low.
The final approval stage for exploitation is just about to be approved and extraction will begin. The company already has one contract with a Japanese smelter and is in discussions with smelters in a series of countries.
Nothing clever about the operation, as the ore is of sufficiently high grade, they dig it up and ship it out. Infrastrucure is already in place for operation.
TMC is currently priced at 18m, the initial Japanese contract is worth 4m and each additional contract will hopefully be at this level or greater.
Final approval turns the company into a producer and each additional contract simply increases their size.
The management is tight with cash and has some good quality mining skills onboard.
The Philippine government is fast tracking the final approval and the company says it expects it shortly.
One to hold for approval and through the series of RNS's as more contracts are won. Company should be worth 50m in 6 months and 100m in 12-18 months.
Buy it, ignore it, just pointing this one out.

halifax - 11 Aug 2007 10:40 - 731 of 879

Why? Have any of the fundamentals changed?

aldwickk - 11 Aug 2007 12:40 - 732 of 879

No need for the funamentals to change for it to go down, if only it was that simple.

halifax - 11 Aug 2007 19:47 - 733 of 879

The reason for any share to rise or fall is based on news flow and general market conditions. If you wish to short this stock please say so.

maddoctor - 14 Aug 2007 09:10 - 734 of 879

wots gone wrong with this then?

halifax - 14 Aug 2007 09:13 - 735 of 879

The price of nickel has been falling as global shortages ease.

cynic - 14 Aug 2007 09:21 - 736 of 879

not to THAT extent! ...... fall is prob more to general market malaise, lack of any news, forced margin sales and investor boredom ..... underlying price of nickel may have dipped, but most unlikely to be in for any dramatic or extended decline as China, India and Pakistan booming economies continue to gobble up a wide range of hard commods

halifax - 14 Aug 2007 09:32 - 737 of 879

The price of nickel peaked in May 2007 at around $55000 per ton today it is $27250 per ton QED. Source LME.

maddoctor - 14 Aug 2007 09:35 - 739 of 879

i know about the price of nickel but this fall seems a bit steep!

looking around it seems the small miners are in general being dumped

cynic - 14 Aug 2007 19:21 - 740 of 879

[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]
sorry it's so small, but even so, i think we'll all find it useful

hlyeo98 - 14 Aug 2007 19:32 - 741 of 879

TMC has fallen from grace...150p in sight

Chart.aspx?Provider=EODIntra&Code=TMC&Si

halifax - 14 Aug 2007 20:06 - 742 of 879

The question that remains unanswered is whether TMC is profitable now that it is generating cash from exporting laterite ore. Only the directors of Berong Mining Corporation know the answer to this question but in reality it is unlikely they continue to mine and ship if it is not generating a surplus. Perhaps a trading statement would be useful to investors.

Personally I would be more than happy to increase my shareholding at 150p.

oilyrag - 15 Aug 2007 07:34 - 743 of 879

I am waiting for when they directors next offer themselves options at as low a price as possible. This is why I believe they are not very enthusiastic in their RNS's. Why have an option at 5, when you can have it at 2 or less. Then I shall buy back two or three times my original holding.

cynic - 15 Aug 2007 08:27 - 744 of 879

that would be foolhardy

lex1000 - 15 Aug 2007 08:43 - 745 of 879

Halifax & Cynic,Two of you both at work here.

aldwickk - 15 Aug 2007 08:59 - 746 of 879

Someones getting paranoid.

cynic - 16 Aug 2007 09:12 - 747 of 879

sure am bleak, no doubt exacerbated by a stack of forced sales by CFD holders (like me, but i still have mine!) ....... sp had damn well better remember how to bounce or it will disappear down the plughole!

halifax - 16 Aug 2007 17:58 - 748 of 879

RNS says AXA has increased its shareholding to 12.14% .

cynic - 16 Aug 2007 17:59 - 749 of 879

wish it was >29.5% ...... or any other bugger for that matter!

oilyrag - 16 Aug 2007 20:53 - 750 of 879

|Halifax, if you check rns 21/05/07 you will find all 4 elements of the AXA group have reduced their respective holdings not increased. Holdings were 3.845 million at +14%.
Register now or login to post to this thread.