Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

I saw the whole debate. Trump attempted to say a lot of untruths, but Clinton calmly challenged them. He wasn't aggressive and loud. This worked against him as people seemed to listen to what he was saying for a change. She got a lot applause for her comments. It seemed a good win for her.

2517,

Dil's Nah.

Much more fun.

-=-=

Does Hillary deserve that label of liar more than Donald, or Theresa?

Snowdon persecuted for is e mails which were less damaging than the vile Clintons why is she not in prison. she is a blatant liar and evil ,if the AMERICANS vote her in then god help the future of the USA ,
that's my lot on the issue .

I am glad you got that off your chest!

I am reliably told that this is Hilary reminding Bill of Monica Lewinsky...could be wrong.

what about her toy boy

The US election is the self-entitled v the self-deluded but I'm not sure which is which.

what about her toy boy ..


bored I am going to the shops

I'm not to enamoured with either, but could you trust someone with state secrets
when they use their own personnel email address for government business..
OR where the Clinton Foundation get their funding from....

prospect.org/article/clinton-foundation-donor-list-released

Laurenrose.

Are you jealous or would you like his telephone number?

-=-=-=

Perhaps, as much as I would trust somebody who would have a conversation with a PR agent, trusted advisor, party leader or friends.

on that basis i assume you don't even trust "ken the beloved" :-)

Do you mean Ken Clarke?

How could I?

PS.

that is a bit unfair on Ken Clarke.

If I had the information in his written hand, witnessed and checked by a legal friend,
then perhaps I would trust his information.

a freudian slip of course :-)

try "jeremy the beloved" :-)

Telegraph.
One poll carried out by CNBC with a sample size of 400,000 said that 61 per cent preferred Trump's performance, while a similar poll from the Drudge Report put the figure at 80 per cent.

Conversely, media pundits have largely handed the victory to Mrs Clinton, praising her measured performance, flashes of humour and tough line of questioning against her rival.

Well, I would prefer the viewer figures to the media pundits since most of the latter were already in one camp or the other.

I listen to the "discussion" between Trump and Clinton and thought the latter appeared more "composed", more competent and as well as more "honest" than Trump.

Trump came as a bar room brawler, even if he is said not to drink. Perhaps, he should.

But, what do I know, Trump may go down well with rednecks like Farage does in the UK.

You can't resist all the time having a go at Nige can you gordon bennet .

V,

He is such an easy target!

For a one track mind Yes . eh Freda.

Manuel.

Did you mean Paxman or Thorpe?

Would have thought the latter would have fitted quite nicely into the Con Party.