Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

iturama - 27 Sep 2016 13:52 - 73522 of 81564

I am reliably told that this is Hilary reminding Bill of Monica Lewinsky...could be wrong.

Laurenrose - 27 Sep 2016 13:54 - 73523 of 81564

what about her toy boy

iturama - 27 Sep 2016 13:54 - 73524 of 81564

The US election is the self-entitled v the self-deluded but I'm not sure which is which.

Laurenrose - 27 Sep 2016 13:55 - 73525 of 81564

what about her toy boy ..


bored I am going to the shops

grannyboy - 27 Sep 2016 14:18 - 73526 of 81564

I'm not to enamoured with either, but could you trust someone with state secrets
when they use their own personnel email address for government business..
OR where the Clinton Foundation get their funding from....

prospect.org/article/clinton-foundation-donor-list-released

Fred1new - 27 Sep 2016 14:46 - 73527 of 81564

Laurenrose.

Are you jealous or would you like his telephone number?

-=-=-=

Perhaps, as much as I would trust somebody who would have a conversation with a PR agent, trusted advisor, party leader or friends.


cynic - 27 Sep 2016 15:19 - 73528 of 81564

on that basis i assume you don't even trust "ken the beloved" :-)

Fred1new - 27 Sep 2016 15:38 - 73529 of 81564

Do you mean Ken Clarke?

How could I?

Fred1new - 27 Sep 2016 15:43 - 73530 of 81564

PS.

that is a bit unfair on Ken Clarke.

If I had the information in his written hand, witnessed and checked by a legal friend,
then perhaps I would trust his information.

cynic - 27 Sep 2016 15:54 - 73531 of 81564

a freudian slip of course :-)

try "jeremy the beloved" :-)

iturama - 27 Sep 2016 15:54 - 73532 of 81564

Telegraph.
One poll carried out by CNBC with a sample size of 400,000 said that 61 per cent preferred Trump's performance, while a similar poll from the Drudge Report put the figure at 80 per cent.

Conversely, media pundits have largely handed the victory to Mrs Clinton, praising her measured performance, flashes of humour and tough line of questioning against her rival.

Well, I would prefer the viewer figures to the media pundits since most of the latter were already in one camp or the other.

Fred1new - 27 Sep 2016 16:16 - 73533 of 81564

I listen to the "discussion" between Trump and Clinton and thought the latter appeared more "composed", more competent and as well as more "honest" than Trump.

Trump came as a bar room brawler, even if he is said not to drink. Perhaps, he should.

But, what do I know, Trump may go down well with rednecks like Farage does in the UK.

VICTIM - 27 Sep 2016 16:23 - 73534 of 81564

You can't resist all the time having a go at Nige can you gordon bennet .

Fred1new - 27 Sep 2016 16:47 - 73535 of 81564

V,

He is such an easy target!

VICTIM - 27 Sep 2016 16:50 - 73536 of 81564

For a one track mind Yes . eh Freda.

Fred1new - 27 Sep 2016 16:54 - 73537 of 81564

Manuel.

Did you mean Paxman or Thorpe?

Would have thought the latter would have fitted quite nicely into the Con Party.

Fred1new - 27 Sep 2016 16:54 - 73538 of 81564

Manuel.

Did you mean Paxman or Thorpe?

Would have thought the latter would have fitted quite nicely into the Con Party.

2517GEORGE - 27 Sep 2016 16:59 - 73539 of 81564

Labour's Defence Secretary was none too pleased yesterday having to pull part of his speech re Trident. The Labour Party split is still very much in evidence.
2517

Fred1new - 27 Sep 2016 17:10 - 73540 of 81564

Almost as split as much as the soft and hard Brexiters and the remainers in the cons party.

Forgot they all went to the grammar schools or was it upmarket Borstals.

Fred1new - 27 Sep 2016 17:10 - 73541 of 81564

Almost as split as much as the soft and hard Brexiters and the remainers in the cons party.

Forgot they all went to the grammar schools or was it upmarket Borstals.
Register now or login to post to this thread.