Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

what about her toy boy ..


bored I am going to the shops

I'm not to enamoured with either, but could you trust someone with state secrets
when they use their own personnel email address for government business..
OR where the Clinton Foundation get their funding from....

prospect.org/article/clinton-foundation-donor-list-released

Laurenrose.

Are you jealous or would you like his telephone number?

-=-=-=

Perhaps, as much as I would trust somebody who would have a conversation with a PR agent, trusted advisor, party leader or friends.

on that basis i assume you don't even trust "ken the beloved" :-)

Do you mean Ken Clarke?

How could I?

PS.

that is a bit unfair on Ken Clarke.

If I had the information in his written hand, witnessed and checked by a legal friend,
then perhaps I would trust his information.

a freudian slip of course :-)

try "jeremy the beloved" :-)

Telegraph.
One poll carried out by CNBC with a sample size of 400,000 said that 61 per cent preferred Trump's performance, while a similar poll from the Drudge Report put the figure at 80 per cent.

Conversely, media pundits have largely handed the victory to Mrs Clinton, praising her measured performance, flashes of humour and tough line of questioning against her rival.

Well, I would prefer the viewer figures to the media pundits since most of the latter were already in one camp or the other.

I listen to the "discussion" between Trump and Clinton and thought the latter appeared more "composed", more competent and as well as more "honest" than Trump.

Trump came as a bar room brawler, even if he is said not to drink. Perhaps, he should.

But, what do I know, Trump may go down well with rednecks like Farage does in the UK.

You can't resist all the time having a go at Nige can you gordon bennet .

V,

He is such an easy target!

For a one track mind Yes . eh Freda.

Manuel.

Did you mean Paxman or Thorpe?

Would have thought the latter would have fitted quite nicely into the Con Party.

Manuel.

Did you mean Paxman or Thorpe?

Would have thought the latter would have fitted quite nicely into the Con Party.

Labour's Defence Secretary was none too pleased yesterday having to pull part of his speech re Trident. The Labour Party split is still very much in evidence.
2517

Almost as split as much as the soft and hard Brexiters and the remainers in the cons party.

Forgot they all went to the grammar schools or was it upmarket Borstals.

Almost as split as much as the soft and hard Brexiters and the remainers in the cons party.

Forgot they all went to the grammar schools or was it upmarket Borstals.

Almost as split as much as the soft and hard Brexiters and the remainers in the cons party.

Forgot they all went to the grammar schools or was it upmarket Borstals.

It's obviously affecting you Freda .

It dosn't really matter what the likes of little fred thinks of Nigel Farage,
UKIP achieved their main objective of getting a referendum, and if all goes
to plan we should be rid of the constraints of Brussels within two years.

But If there is any stitch up then I should expect to see Nigel Farage back
in action, to uphold the wishes of the LEAVE voters, and complete our
withdrawal from the EU.


The Labour party are not electable, their policy's are pie in the sky, and it looks
like the Blairites are going to be skulking in the backgrounds waiting for Corbyn
to fail at the next GE, and hope he fails so they can mount another challenge..

They don't have the wherewithall to split and start another party up, they have
no one with any personality, really this would be an excellant opportunity for
UKIP to take advantage and become the main opposition to the Tory's . .