Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

PC & MAC CLINIC - On line problem solving. (CPU)     

Crocodile - 16 Dec 2002 03:59

zzaxx99 - 10 Nov 2008 10:04 - 7396 of 11003

It's very common to fake the from address - I would say that 99% of the spam I get has a faked From address, often my own (why the morons figure that I'm likely to open an email that apparently comes from myself, but which I know I didn't send, I have no idea).

Google "fake from address email" and the 3rd or 4th link has a video showing how to fake the from address. Another great contribution to the internet.

ThePublisher - 10 Nov 2008 13:04 - 7397 of 11003

Thanks zz,

Now I know.

And, as you hint, another handy resource for the prankster in my soul.

TP

scussy - 10 Nov 2008 15:50 - 7398 of 11003

when i open a fresh page using IE it takes about 18 seconds to open,
then when i start looking, the pages open up very fast as it was before,
the only thing i can remember doing before this happened was a disc defrag,
all the scans has been done,(AVG,SpyBot,Super-Antispy,cleanup)

any ideas how to get the first page in IE to open up within 2 secs,homepage i use is google.

sc

ThePublisher - 10 Nov 2008 16:59 - 7399 of 11003

scussy,

Have you tried changing the home page to blank?

TP

scussy - 10 Nov 2008 17:27 - 7400 of 11003

yes tried many homepages,still the same 18 secs,firefox is instant,so was my IE,maybe it was a microsoft update,ill check the other pc's later,on lappy at the mo.

ThePublisher - 10 Nov 2008 19:05 - 7401 of 11003

scussy,

Again a basic question.

Have you cleaned all the cache's and similar?

TP

scussy - 11 Nov 2008 01:26 - 7402 of 11003

strange it now opens as it should,nice and fast,

sc

MightyMicro - 12 Nov 2008 23:04 - 7403 of 11003

Stop press News for Windows XP users.

It seems that one of the recent updates to Windows SP3 has resolved the DHCP problem with (mainly) wireless routers whereby a default gateway would not be set, thus rendering XP SP3 machine useless with a number of WiFi access points.

We discovered this today during an off-site meeting using a LinkSys Vodafone WRT54G3G 3G wireless router which had proved inaccessible to one of our number previously, now suddenly worked after the latest Microsoft updates to his SP3 laptop.

Photomad - 17 Nov 2008 15:14 - 7404 of 11003

I defragment the disk on my pc every week to keep it running efficiently but on the last occasion the process could not be completed and various files were left unfragmented. Tried to find a free programm to download to repare but so far no luck. Anyone any ideas?

Rgds
Photo

ExecLine - 17 Nov 2008 15:41 - 7405 of 11003

Try SmartDefrag from Here

Take a bit of care. There are other things about to download, which are nothing at all to do with SmartDefrag.

At the site above: Click on the 'Download Now' button - the one with the funny green'white symbol and where it says 'Tested spyware free'.
Note: Do not click on the green 'Download Here' button on the same page in the advert below, where it says 'Recommended Download'.

Optimist - 17 Nov 2008 17:37 - 7406 of 11003

The best defragmenter is Diskeeper which is a beefed up version of the one supplied with Windows. You do have to pay for it but it's woth it and they do a 30 day trial. If you want a free one, then PortableApps.com have one that also has the advantage of not needing to be installed (however, I haven't used it yet).

More important, is why your defrag failed. If it is just a random error then you should be able to re-run it. The most common reason for files not to be defragmented is lack of free space and/or a fault on the disk. If you think the latter is possible then back up all of your data and run Chkdsk.

If you have plenty of free disk space and no faults, then consider which files still need to be defragmented. If they are rarely used files with only a couple of fragments/ file then it does not matter. If the page file is fragmented, then this needs to be defragmented, most programs will not do this though the better versions of Diskeeper will and there are workarounds for other programs.

Haystack - 17 Nov 2008 17:51 - 7407 of 11003

I have been using Smartdefrag. I sometimes find that there are files that are still fragmented. If I run it again straight away then this usually solves it or at the least there are much fewer files still fragmented.

I have had to run it three times to get 0% defragmented. It may well be a lack of a contiguous space big enough for the file to be defragmented.

The space free may be quite large before the first attempt, but it can be in so many small pieces as to be difficult to use by the defrag process on the first attempt and will only be usable when it is itself one large area.

maddoctor - 21 Nov 2008 12:19 - 7408 of 11003

I have just developed a fault with the Login for BTYahoo. When trying the Login programme it will just sit for several minutes with the Task Manager saying "not responding" but will eventually get me in. On Log out the same thing happens i.e. appears to hang but eventually Logs Out.

Thought at first it was AVG and then Yahoo servers but immediately switching off computer and restarting seems to solve the problem which leaves me with a fault in the Login/Logout programme???? which has come from where? and how do I fix it?.

any ideas anybody?

Photomad - 21 Nov 2008 14:47 - 7409 of 11003

Thanks for all the help and advice, I'll give it a go this w/e.

Photo.

klal - 21 Nov 2008 16:46 - 7410 of 11003

I'm going to have to replace my existing hard disk which is a Maxtor 6Y080L0. Not being terribly clever when it comes to hardware, I'm finding it difficult to work out exactly what kind of a replacement I should look for. I'll probably need an ATA-133 type drive. Can anyone recommend a specific replacement drive please?

EDIT: I notice there aren't too many of these drives available...ATA-133 is getting long on the tooth, I guess.

Optimist - 21 Nov 2008 17:13 - 7411 of 11003

There are still some ATA-133 drives around, but it may be cheaper to buy an IDE to SATA adaptor.

klal - 23 Nov 2008 11:26 - 7412 of 11003

Optimist, thanks for that.

I have tracked down a Western Digital 160 Gig ATA drive. Western Digital
This is what I intend doing: Using Acronis Trueimage Personal, create a complete image and restore it on the new disk. Can it be as simple as that? I'm a bit confused about imaging and cloning - are they the same thing? I want to avoid installing Windows XP on the new disk and am hoping restoring the image/clone would do the job. Any advice gratefully accepted.

Optimist - 23 Nov 2008 11:57 - 7413 of 11003

klal

I haven't used True image but I assume that it can do this. I suspect that there is an option to transfer the entire disk directly to the new drive and resize the partition at the same time. A common reason to change hard disks is because they are full up, in which case, it is not practical to make a copy of the image first.

If by any chance Trueimage does not do the job then Paragon Partition Manager 8 - which is availible free if you look around - will definitely work.

Once you have transfered the disk, put the old one in a safe place as a backup.

klal - 23 Nov 2008 12:17 - 7414 of 11003

Thanks Optimist. Luckily, I had invested in an external 160 GB USB drive for backups. I intend creating the image on that drive rather than the existing internal drive. My version of TrueImage is the freebie version(!) which came with some magazine. Just hoping it will be good enough for the job. Hope to schedule this for next weekend. As for the existing hard disk, I'll probably format it and let it remain in the bay as an additional drive after installing the new drive.

ExecLine - 23 Nov 2008 13:31 - 7415 of 11003

klal

ThePublisher was using Acronis True Image above, if you want to check out what he has posted.

I have it on my machine but thus far, I haven't used it.

Be careful! Disk letters in standalone AcronisTrueImage might sometimes differ from the way Windows identifies drives. For example, the D: drive identified in the standalone AcronisTrueImage might correspond to the E: drive in Windows.

I found a 94 page PDF file 'User's Guide' for Acronis True Image 10.0 at

http://eqca.download.acronis.com/pdf/TrueImage10.0_ug.en.pdf

It could be helpful.
Register now or login to post to this thread.