Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

PC & MAC CLINIC - On line problem solving. (CPU)     

Crocodile - 16 Dec 2002 03:59

Optimist - 26 Nov 2008 19:43 - 7438 of 11003

kernow

Regarding RAM, I recently upgraded a desktop that was running XP from 1GB to 3GB. The difference was very noticable, well worth the 40.

ThePublisher - 26 Nov 2008 19:50 - 7439 of 11003

hewitt,

How about the Asus eee with the solid state hard drive?

Well under 200 now.

Probably would stand being dropped.

TP

Optimist - 26 Nov 2008 23:48 - 7440 of 11003

TP

I'm considering one off these.

Which EEE is under 200? Itseemss to me that the entry level one to get is the 901 but I haven't seen it at 200. There are also reports that the hard disk is very slow.

In any case, it would not be right for kernow because it has no CD Drive and Linux is dodgy in repalying Powerpoint.

tyketto - 27 Nov 2008 00:47 - 7441 of 11003

There are outlets that sell the EEC range with XP.
mac

ThePublisher - 27 Nov 2008 07:07 - 7442 of 11003

Opt

This is a link I was sent on the 13th Nov.

Yes the Linux ones have their downsides - but they'd do what Alan seemed to want.

TP

kernow - 27 Nov 2008 09:07 - 7443 of 11003

Well a linux machine is out for me. I've downloaded Open Office and it seems fine with the powerpoint displays but I need my USB dongle and this only works on windows it seems. Shame cos I quite fancy not contributing to Gates' world domination.

hewittalan6 - 27 Nov 2008 09:28 - 7444 of 11003

Thanks TP et al.
Will look into that as soon as I get a mo.
Alan

ThePublisher - 27 Nov 2008 10:24 - 7445 of 11003

kernow,

If you look at that Asus link you will see that the purchasers have also bought one of these.

Or maybe I am misunderstanding what your USB dongle does.

TP

ExecLine - 27 Nov 2008 11:52 - 7446 of 11003

My daughter is wanting to go on the 'two monitors' route with her PC. She hasn't said but I would think she wants 17" ones. I would want her to get good ones as they are better for eye care. I can help her shop around for a good deal but I am looking for info' about what YOU think are good monitors and are very pleased with yourself.

Any tips? Know of any deals? Etc, etc.

Seymour Clearly - 27 Nov 2008 12:30 - 7447 of 11003

Exec, it might be worth considering a good 20 or 22" widescreen first. I have an Iiyama 20" widescreen and I can (just) display a web page next to a word document, or have 2 word documents open at any one time with a little bit of overlap. Can't remember the model number but it wasn't dear and the quality is first class. Bought it from ebuyer. If you're interested I'll find out the model and post it here.

One large screen is a lot less desk footprint than two 17"ers.

ThePublisher - 27 Nov 2008 12:39 - 7448 of 11003

Exec,

I've used Samsung SyncMasters for some time and find them excellent. As you know I do some photographic work and I calibrate them so that the screen image matches what will appear on my prints.

That dims the screen quite noticeably and I'd find the default uncalibrated setting too bright for comfort. I'm not suggesting that you spend money on a calibrator, but you might find it better for your daughter's eyes if you/she ran them a bit dimmer than the out of the box setting.

TP

kernow - 27 Nov 2008 14:38 - 7449 of 11003

Thanks TP but I think you may have. The dongle is for 3g+ internet connection.

hangon - 27 Nov 2008 14:53 - 7450 of 11003

- - - - - Dual Screens - - - -
Some Graphic-cards have the ability to drive two monitors - yet I can find no explanation as to why I'd want this.
-What I'd like to do is have a secondary screen with the program "tools" on and the main-screen with the photo (for example), but my software is quite old and I wonder if only selected (ie Expensive) software would permit this. Since Monitors are quiter cheap ( and many have a "spare"), I wonder why computers aren't geared-up to using multiple screens...as it is most times I am using about 70% of the screen the rest being Windows static bits. ....OR.... Perhpas I could shunt-off ads onto the second screen, so as to make reading the content of Web-pages easier...
Yes I know I can F11(Full-screen)....but that's not much difference.
I can understand two-players of a game might want their own screen, but is this the only "practical" application for a somewhat more-expensive Graphic-card....
Anyone+ a regular two-screen user...?

Jonk1 - 27 Nov 2008 15:18 - 7451 of 11003

Kernow,

I recently bought an Adventt 4211 netbook and now it is superb. I say now as when I bought it I couldn't stay connected through wireless link for more than a few seconds. This is a known problem and for some reason Dixons are selling it without sorting it out. Talk about shooting yourself in the foot! I tried a couple of fixes but downloading the latest MS wireless drivers did it for me. As I said at the start I think this is a great product.

hilary - 27 Nov 2008 15:23 - 7452 of 11003

hangon,

I currently use 3 screens, but have the capabiliy for 8 with 2 x Matrox Quad. I would've thought that most people here on the Pay Per View use multiple monitors.

Optimist - 27 Nov 2008 15:29 - 7453 of 11003

I always use a second screen except when I'm away from home with my laptop.

All you need to run a second screen is an extra video socket and a screen. Most laptops now have a video out socket and many graphics cards have dual output. I've seen some advertised under 20. Also, if you have an older computer, you can often (but not always) add an extra card and use that as well as the original - if you go that route, try to get a card that uses the same chip as the existing.

If you are only browsing the web and using Word etc. then an expensive graphics card will not help much although it would help with some photo and video apps.

As regards software, Windows has supported a theoretical 10 monitors since at least W2K. All you have to do is configure them in the display setings. When you enable extra monitors, the Windows desktop is expanded to cover both screens but the taskbar will only be on one. Most apps can be moved to the screen of choice and then maximised to fill that screen of stretched accross two.

The advantage is that you have at least double the screen area.

kernow - 27 Nov 2008 15:33 - 7454 of 11003

Jonk1
I had a bad experience with advent a few years back so it's not a brand I could feel happy with. Thanks for the rec. and hope it works out for you. I've now bought a asus eee 904HD - XP, 80gb HD for 225.07 inc delivery.

Seymour Clearly - 27 Nov 2008 15:55 - 7455 of 11003

hangon

You don't need expensive specialist software to run on two screens. Windows allows you to place the software window wherever you want. You just drag and drop the top bar of the program, but need to make sure it isn't maximised to the screen it's sitting on first. Your two screens can be set up so that they become one large windows screen and you just place your software window wherever you want it.

In my experience, running a second screen from a laptop say results in a nice dual screen but the two are at lower resolution. Using any desktop PC I'd go and buy a matrox twin head graphics card. There are loads on ebay. Make sure you get the correct connection for your machine's motherboard - PCI or AGP.

I run a matrox twin head on XP and it works a dream. I do have a piece of "task specific" software which you can't buy commercially which won't run on it - it just sits halfway between the two split over two screens - but that's a rare event and all commercially available software shouldn't be a problem.

Optimist - 27 Nov 2008 16:23 - 7456 of 11003

SC

If your laptop runs at reduced resolution with two screens running then I suspect it is low on graphics memory. You could try reducing the colour depth to 16bit or you may be able to allocate more RAM to the graphics in the BIOS settings.

I forgot to mention above, Another good application to run on the second screen is Remote Desktop Connection. It enables you to control another machine on your LAN that runs XP Prof. Then you can run some of the power hungry apps on the other machine.

Seymour Clearly - 27 Nov 2008 17:27 - 7457 of 11003

It's a relative's machine and is a cheapo Fujitsu Seimens so graphics is pretty basic.

I didn't know about remote desktop. That's interesting. Thanks.
Register now or login to post to this thread.