required field
- 03 Feb 2016 10:00
Thought I'd start a new thread as this is going to be a major talking point this year...have not made up my mind yet...(unlike bucksfizz)....but thinking of voting for an exit as Europe is not doing Britain any good at all it seems....
VICTIM
- 14 Sep 2017 12:11
- 7512 of 12628
Thanks for the advice to skip it , which i did .
Fred1new
- 14 Sep 2017 12:40
- 7513 of 12628
Vicky,
Unless somebody is reading and typing for you I realise you can do both.
The difficulty for you and Dumbo seems to be understanding what you read or hear.
-=-=-=-=-=
VICTIM
- 14 Sep 2017 12:50
- 7514 of 12628
Or maybe just fed up with your repeated bleatings , baa , baa . ( i think you mean can't )
mentor
- 14 Sep 2017 12:57
- 7515 of 12628
History tells us nothing... Freda
and history never repeat twice.
But reallity says you have been a negative poster for too long, and that is a problem of old age and lone
so the conclusion is, You are ready for the BOX
# Brain Function And Negative Thinking Linked To Late-onset Depression
Late-onset depression, which first emerges in people aged 60 and over, is linked to a decline in the brain's executive functions that leads to repetitive, negative thought patterns a new study reveals.
John-Paul Flintoff
Psychologists use the term “automatic negative thoughts” to describe the ideas that pop into our heads uninvited, like burglars, and leave behind a mess of uncomfortable emotions. In the 1960s, one of the founders of cognitive therapy, Aaron Beck, concluded that ANTs sabotage our best self, and lead to a vicious circle of misery: creating a general mindset that is variously unhappy or anxious or angry (take your pick) and which is (therefore) all the more likely to generate new ANTs. We get stuck in the same old neural pathways, having the same negative thoughts again and again.
VICTIM
- 14 Sep 2017 13:04
- 7516 of 12628
Yeh ants in your pants mate .
jimmy b
- 14 Sep 2017 13:05
- 7517 of 12628
Fred1new - 14 Sep 2017 11:09 - 7506 of 7515
This thread has memories of the xenophobia shown in the 30s.
------------
Fred you really are a thicko , i feel for you.
Fred1new
- 14 Sep 2017 13:11
- 7518 of 12628
Hilary,
I would think it is the hope that the economies of the top half will improve by modernistion.
I wandered around Portugal in the late 90s and early 2000s.
What was noted was the improvement of "infrastructure" and general standards "well-being".
Much due to EU and its "subsidies".
Their economy improved until the crash.
(How much of Portugal economy is/was based on tourism is/was I don't know.)
It was the support of the pack which gave them strength,
I am "sure" that the same effects can occur for others in the top half of the list.
Also, prefer not to have discontentment on ones border.
France will be lucky to have border control of the channel.

hilary
- 14 Sep 2017 13:28
- 7519 of 12628
Fred,
Yes, it's quite understandable how poorer members have benefited from EU membership (
How poorer countries benefit from membership of the EU), but that doesn't really answer the question as to how the richer countries have benefited by allowing them to join the club.
hilary
- 14 Sep 2017 13:40
- 7520 of 12628
Btw, there is a very valid answer to that question, but it's a ticking timebomb which the Great British public (in their infinite wisdom) don't realise.
iturama
- 14 Sep 2017 14:31
- 7521 of 12628
It is not immigration from the EU that is the issue. To my mind, it is a complete red herring. The problem is immigration from outside the EU, all in the name of multiculturism. All governments have failed to stop the inflows from outside.
Notice the correlation between British people leaving and people coming in from outside the EU.
I would be quite happy to see immigration continuing from the culturally similar EU (the french apart) in return for staying in the common market.
hilary
- 14 Sep 2017 14:35
- 7522 of 12628
You didn't need a referendum and you don't need to leave the EU to limit non-EU immigration, iturama.
Maybe there's a reason why successive governments haven't put quotas or caps on it over the years. Maybe, without the same levels of EU immigration post-Brexit, non-EU immigration will be higher. Now there's a thought.... :o)
hilary
- 14 Sep 2017 14:44
- 7523 of 12628
Regarding the French, I think there's about 180k Brits in France and a similar number of French in the UK. Not really a large enough number to bother about imo, and pretty balanced on both sides of the equation.
Compare that to the 916k Poles living in the UK, and the 1.4m total EU8 citizens living in the UK, and balance that against the handful of Brits living in EU8 countries (only 14k), and you've got a problem if you don't invest their tax income in upgrading infrastructure.
iturama
- 14 Sep 2017 14:48
- 7524 of 12628
Maybe. I didn't vote out because of EU immigration. I voted out to be rid of the EU Commission, its load of self-entitled apparatchiks and the EU project.
iturama
- 14 Sep 2017 14:50
- 7525 of 12628
The french was my feeble attempt at a joke. Lovely people I'm sure. Over there.
hilary
- 14 Sep 2017 14:54
- 7526 of 12628
And the rulings of the EU Commission really affect your lifestyle in any way other than by restricting anti-competitive practices, limiting pollution, and making beaches cleaner and air purer?
I would've thought they're good things?
iturama
- 14 Sep 2017 15:16
- 7527 of 12628
Its not the good things that irritate me. Its the rest, starting with that old fart Junkie.
iturama
- 14 Sep 2017 15:16
- 7528 of 12628
MaxK
- 14 Sep 2017 15:17
- 7529 of 12628
What are the benefits like in Luxembourg?
hilary
- 14 Sep 2017 15:28
- 7530 of 12628
Are you looking for a new council flat then?
MaxK
- 14 Sep 2017 15:31
- 7531 of 12628
Wouldn't mind hilly.
But looking at the comparative income figs, Luxembourg must have something going for it.
Why aint the grunts piling in there?