goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
grannyboy
- 14 Dec 2016 14:14
- 75417 of 81564
If they had gone along and supported cameron, then the rebels and isis would
have been armed by us, but then again that's what the western leaders plans
are...The islamisation of the west...
You've got to understand that the savages and the followers need a strong
leader in charge to keep all the different sects of islam from killing each other.
Sadam Hussein/Assad/Gadafi were not perfect by any standards of imagination,
but they mostly kept their countries peacefull..
Cameron was quite prepared to supply arms to our enemies...But the west want
to harmonise the ME, for feck sake...
Fred1new
- 14 Dec 2016 14:26
- 75418 of 81564
And quietly tortured and killed those who opposed them!
grannyboy
- 14 Dec 2016 14:38
- 75419 of 81564
Yes there has to be victims for the greater good..
But little fred wouldn't understand that..
Haystack
- 14 Dec 2016 15:00
- 75420 of 81564
gb
ISIS wouldn't have been armed. We were and are fighting rhem. Everyone in the region is opposed to ISIS.
Fred1new
- 14 Dec 2016 16:24
- 75421 of 81564
GB.
Perhaps, you could forfeit your own life and those of your family for the greater good of others!
0-0-0
Haze,
Everyone?
Why does ISIS get their conscripts?
Perhaps, it is bred into them like some members of the Cons party!
grannyboy
- 14 Dec 2016 16:28
- 75422 of 81564
Haystack..Rubbish!!
Even the white helmets have been accused of being in with isis..
grannyboy
- 14 Dec 2016 16:33
- 75423 of 81564
I wouldn't have wanted to displace a leader whether a dictator or not, and
those with the mentality that they've got in the ME, they need a ruthless leader..
Haystack
- 14 Dec 2016 17:36
- 75424 of 81564
gb
That's ridiculous. The rebels and ISIS are two separate groups and are fighting each other. The UN people on the ground might be sympathetic to the rebels but would not support ISIS. You must be reading the fake news web sites. I thought it was just the US that had a gullible population
grannyboy
- 14 Dec 2016 18:56
- 75425 of 81564
I'm not reading any fake news web sites, unless you call the bbc, sky, rt,
etc, etc as being fake news sites, but then again most of them are, I just
put it all together and filter by what sounds common sense, feasably possible.
As to the rebels and isis being two seperate groups, for a start there isn't
just one rebel side, and some 'rebel' groups have been shown to belong to
isis, and the west was keen to give arms to ANY that was just opposed to
Assad...
grannyboy
- 14 Dec 2016 19:01
- 75426 of 81564
And the UN are a discredited organisation, they don't have anyone in the
effected area's and just take the propaganda pictures put out by those terror
run outfits like the white helmets as gospel..
Haystack
- 14 Dec 2016 19:32
- 75427 of 81564
I can see why cynic has gb filtered. I filtered Fred a couple of years ago and have not missed him.
I am adding gb to my filter list. I will not miss the nonsense he posts.
MaxK
- 14 Dec 2016 19:37
- 75428 of 81564
"Helmet" is the correct word for anyone believing the mainstream news on Syria.
Fred1new
- 14 Dec 2016 20:45
- 75429 of 81564
The oracle has spoken!
cynic
- 15 Dec 2016 09:31
- 75430 of 81564
in most conflicts one can identify "goodies" and "baddies" but in syria they are all "baddies" and further, i do not know who is even fighting for what (allegedly)
Fred1new
- 15 Dec 2016 10:24
- 75431 of 81564
Manuel,
As per usual, you seem confused.
Let GB or JB explain the problem to you.
They have simple understandings to such problems.
cynic
- 15 Dec 2016 11:02
- 75432 of 81564
the good thing about gb is that i have him filtered!
Dil
- 15 Dec 2016 11:31
- 75433 of 81564
Talk about rewriting history Hays. The Cons/Libs had a majority and failed to deliver. Ed Millibands support shouldn't have been needed.
Lay the blame where it really lies and that's with the Conservatives and Libs if any. I can understand Millibands reluctance after the shit Blair gets over the Iraq war.
Haystack
- 15 Dec 2016 12:10
- 75434 of 81564
It was a coalition and it was known that Labour votes were needed due to some Libs and Conservatives being opposed. Miliband promised to support the motion. Then due to worry about his own skin regarding his party he chickened out on the day. His party were associating him with Blair and calling him a warmonger. He ran away from the situation instead for his own personal reasons. It was clear what was happening and I remember posting here about it at the time.
Fred1new
- 15 Dec 2016 12:52
- 75435 of 81564
Hays.
Slightly tinted glasses as usual.
Pop off down to CCHQ and ask
jimmy b
- 15 Dec 2016 13:41
- 75436 of 81564
Hays has you filtered Fred (along with several others) , i have not been here for a while however i see your still throwing insults around , have you nothing better to do ?