Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

PC & MAC CLINIC - On line problem solving. (CPU)     

Crocodile - 16 Dec 2002 03:59

Optimist - 15 Dec 2008 18:11 - 7548 of 11003

Dailos

Are you running XP or Vista?

512MB should just about be OK for XP although 1GB+ would be better.

Vista needs at least 1GB better to use 2GB+

Dailos - 15 Dec 2008 18:35 - 7549 of 11003

Opti..
Vista so how can i make it 2GB+ ?

Optimist - 15 Dec 2008 18:51 - 7550 of 11003

Dalios

Goto Crucial. The have an onlne memory checker which will tell you what you need and how to fit it.

In my experience, they are close to the best deals and their service is first class.

HARRYCAT - 15 Dec 2008 20:59 - 7551 of 11003

I agree. Crucial are an excellent company. Competitive prices & excellent delivery time, but be aware that RAM is expensive, so brace yourself!

Dil - 15 Dec 2008 21:13 - 7552 of 11003

Cheers Optimist I'll pass that on.

Dailos ... it'll be out of date by the time you fix , bin it ... hope this helps :-)

MightyMicro - 15 Dec 2008 21:26 - 7553 of 11003

Dailos: Vista is hopeless in 512Mb and sluggish in 1Gb -- it really needs 2Gb. The 1.86GHz CPU should be OK.

My current laptop is a 1.73Ghz IBM ThinkPad running XP. It was delivered with 512Mb which sort of ran OK, but I immediately added another 512Mb. I've now got 2Gb which is the maximum this particular machine can take.

I second the recommendations for Crucial. They are a first-class outfit.

Dailos - 15 Dec 2008 21:36 - 7554 of 11003

Thanks everybody.
d,

Dil...bog off boyo! :-

Dil - 15 Dec 2008 21:51 - 7555 of 11003

:-)

Haystack - 16 Dec 2008 13:58 - 7556 of 11003

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7784908.stm

09:20 GMT, Tuesday, 16 December 2008

Serious security flaw found in IE

Users of Microsoft's Internet Explorer are being urged by experts to switch to a rival until a serious security flaw has been fixed.

The flaw in Microsoft's Internet Explorer could allow criminals to take control of people's computers and steal their passwords, internet experts say.

Microsoft urged people to be vigilant while it investigated and prepared an emergency patch to resolve it.

Haystack - 17 Dec 2008 13:18 - 7557 of 11003

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7787445.stm

Microsoft plans quick fix for IE

Microsoft is due to issue a patch to fix a security flaw believed to have affected as many as 10,000 websites.

The emergency patch should be available from 1800 GMT on 17 December, Microsoft has said.

Optimist - 17 Dec 2008 13:44 - 7558 of 11003

I heard those reports on the BBC but could find nothing on the Microsoft site.

Has anyone seen any other references to this problem that are not attributable to the BBC?

ExecLine - 17 Dec 2008 14:07 - 7559 of 11003

Microsoft plans emergency Internet Explorer patch

Nearly 2 million PCs infected by bug
December 17, 2008

Microsoft is releasing an emergency security fix for Internet Explorer that will patch a bug that's plaguing the browser.

It's thought that nearly two million computers have been infected by the bug, which allows hackers to steal personal data including passwords if the browser is used to navigate a compromised website. It's been estimated that nearly 10,000 compromised websites currently exist on the web.

HARRYCAT - 17 Dec 2008 14:07 - 7560 of 11003

10,000 websites??? Sounds like a specific problem attributable to a tiny percentage of the global number of websites.

ExecLine - 17 Dec 2008 14:15 - 7561 of 11003

My OE 'Deleted Items' folder is full of links to them:

Even CEOs consult us (obtain a fully verifiable University Degree)
Nationwide Online Banking Security Upgrade
Msg me when ya get a second (pharmacy at unbelievable savings)
Perfect for men and women (miracle weight loss)
The ultimate in prestige and luxury (luxury designer brand timepieces from $49)
Name Brand remedy for cheap (Number 1 online pharmacy)
lowest price name brand remedy (Exclusive Internet pharmacy)

I have not given any of the links, which accompany them.

HARRYCAT - 17 Dec 2008 15:03 - 7562 of 11003

Shouldn't your spam filter prevent you from receiving these via OE? Your ISP should filter them out & allow you to see them by directly accessing your ISP e-mail account.

Optimist - 17 Dec 2008 15:13 - 7563 of 11003

Exec's link points to an article by someone at PC World so it must be true ;)

ExecLine - 17 Dec 2008 15:28 - 7564 of 11003

My ISP is BTInternet.com.

As regards to spam being filitered out by them - Not so!

Not a lot of it, but some of it doesn't even have anything like my e-mail address so I cannot see, for the life of me, why that is the case. However, there are only about 2 or 3 of the latter per two or three days and I simply cannot be bothered to telephone BT and sit on the line pressing '1 for this' and '2 for that', etc.

In total, I would say I get about 6 to 10 spam e-mails per day. So they are easily and highly manageable just yet.

ThePublisher - 17 Dec 2008 16:17 - 7565 of 11003

I've never used OE so I might be missing a point.

I use NPOw to see what is in my compuserve mailbox and simply delete anything that smells of spam. My wife was getting up to 40 a day last week - but they have died away now.

Only when the mailbox contain safe messages do I download them with my Virtual Access.

I'd have thought it highly dangerous to have any software downloading everything it finds at your ISP - but I do think I must be missing the point somehow.

TP

MightyMicro - 17 Dec 2008 16:40 - 7566 of 11003

Our company eliminated 95% of Spam by adding a resend delay to mail coming from unknown sources. Put simply, our mail system says to such mail "hang on, I'm a bit busy, please try again soon" and adds the name to a Greylist. If the remote sender tries again (the recommended interval for mail systems is 10 minutes or so), we accept the mail next time adding something like

X-Greylist: delayed for 00:13:45 at (istgate.ist.co.uk [192.35.198.250])

to the header (which means that the mail was delayed by 13 mins and 45 secs)..

This works because most bulk mail systems don't bother trying again (too busy sending huge amounts of junk). But it can only be implemented by people that have their own server hosting their own domain.

ExecLine - 17 Dec 2008 17:10 - 7567 of 11003

Find out what is really running on your computer!

Hit the red 'Help' button in the box. Then let the analysis begin. This will tell you if there's anything untoward running or present on your machine.

And also from the same site, SuperAntiSpyware is brilliant. The 'Professional' version of the same program is even better.
Register now or login to post to this thread.