goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
iturama
- 03 Jan 2017 15:16
- 75605 of 81564
Only a politician could think that giving away a fixed % of GDP every year is a good idea. It leads to hand outs at financial year end to complete the tally. No private company would set a budget in that way. I sometimes wonder whether our clowns are any better than those in the EU when it comes to dealing with other peoples money. Disgrace. Give where truly needed and forget targets. Same with defence. Spend what is needed. The % of GDP should be guidelines only.
cynic
- 03 Jan 2017 15:25
- 75606 of 81564
No private company would set a budget in that way ....... not so!
i can think of several large (overseas) corporations who run a "use it or lose it" policy
iturama
- 03 Jan 2017 15:54
- 75607 of 81564
The difference is in the "lose it" bit C.
grannyboy
- 03 Jan 2017 16:08
- 75608 of 81564
The NHS is a big believer in spending whatever is in the pot, and not what
should happen, ie if any money is left over at year end then it should be put
back into the pot.
I worked for the NHS several years ago in distribution, the unit i worked at
had some money left over from their allocation and if they didn't use the money
they would lose it, so instead of the left over money going back into the general
NHS funds, it encouraged each unit to waste that money, in the units case where
i was they spent it on a dinky van toy with NHS on the side and a glass tankered
also etched with the NHS logo, of course there was several dozen of each.
I refused mine and expressed my disgust at the wastage..
cynic
- 03 Jan 2017 16:13
- 75609 of 81564
to elucidate .... lose it means that any underspend gets cut from the following year's budget as well
Haystack
- 03 Jan 2017 16:26
- 75610 of 81564
cynic
- 03 Jan 2017 16:31
- 75611 of 81564
a good number of those countries being given aid are also among the world's most corrupt
there are also some stupendously misdirected, smaller aid sums that are regularly brought to light by investigative journalists
2517GEORGE
- 03 Jan 2017 16:33
- 75612 of 81564
''the majority of Britons support overseas development spending''
Where is the proof, has anyone on this thread been asked whether they are for or against the above?
2517
grannyboy
- 03 Jan 2017 16:53
- 75613 of 81564
2517GEORGE, there isn't any proof that Britons support overseas foreign
aid spending, and just like 99.99% of people i spoke to before the referendum
who were going to vote LEAVE, most people i speak to about overseas aid agree
that it should be stopped or severely curtailed...
Fred1new
- 03 Jan 2017 16:53
- 75614 of 81564
cynic
- 03 Jan 2017 17:15
- 75615 of 81564
fred - for how long has uk supported both saudi and syria with armaments?
stop being a naughty boy :-)
Dil
- 04 Jan 2017 11:12
- 75616 of 81564
Cynic they don't lose it if they don't spend it but it makes justifying asking for more the following year even harder.
Council's are worse at this than the NHS imo.
Fred1new
- 04 Jan 2017 13:53
- 75618 of 81564
I only read about half the article and "gave up".
It reminded me of the "Mafia Enquiries" and Al Capone.
From Wiki.
"Capone apparently reveled in attention, such as the cheers from spectators when he appeared at ball games. He made donations to various charities and was viewed by many to be a "modern-day Robin Hood". However, the Saint Valentine's Day Massacre of gang rivals, resulting in the killing of seven men in broad daylight, damaged Chicago's image—as well as Capone's—leading influential citizens to demand governmental action and newspapers to dub him "Public Enemy No. 1""
-=-=-=-==
Are the mobsters and mob are back in control?
Happy days yet to come.
Fred1new
- 04 Jan 2017 13:55
- 75619 of 81564
iturama
- 05 Jan 2017 12:31
- 75620 of 81564
Did you know that we now have a commissioner, or commissar perhaps, who knows, for children? No, neither did I. Sounds like a nice job for some talking head, no doubt thought up by the coalition. How did we manage our kids before... Still, money is no object when it comes to looking after the boys and girls.
Fred1new
- 05 Jan 2017 14:58
- 75623 of 81564
I would prefer to watch him and his henchmen before a judge and jury.
Fred1new
- 05 Jan 2017 14:58
- 75624 of 81564
If anybody wants a punt or two for 2017 have a look at AZM and IRV.
But DYOH.