bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
bhunt1910
- 20 Jul 2005 16:37
- 7598 of 27111
Well must confess - I did nor expect to see 20 again - maybe Seq was right after all.
Well done Seq - u called it right so far - damn you!!
Baza
jimmy b
- 20 Jul 2005 16:38
- 7599 of 27111
Chiva ,,like you i could see many more buys than sells, thats what i was moaning about, but reading seq's comments , maybe there are more sold than we know.
Chiva20
- 20 Jul 2005 16:42
- 7600 of 27111
frustrating, I lost a series of top ups just there (spreadbets) Still in but hanging on now. Couple of fat buys just went through surely it can't drop more?
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 16:53
- 7601 of 27111
850k on VirtX now and trading continues+ that odd WT stuff coming thro` again
Here is my take- the buys today show lets say 7m to 3.25m round figs. the WT could be old stuff toalling 3.6m -and also could be sales from days back-up to 5 days back, that makes 7m buy to 6.85m sell, take some of the VirtX as sells, and pic.is clearer- there are afew obvious rollovers too- some wrongly marked double sells some buys, the sells seem to be the most wrongly charged- probably another 3-5k of sells, which tips the pic. into possibly a million more sells then buys
QED-COULD BE TOTAL CRAP- BEATS COMING HERE WITH A LOAD OF SPAM AND JAM TOMORROW!!!!!
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 16:54
- 7602 of 27111
PS---1.25M TRADES SHOWING ON vIRTx NOW-YOU ARE BEING STUFFED LADS.
Chiva20
- 20 Jul 2005 17:40
- 7603 of 27111
Seq, how can you ever accuse Paul of ramping. Shocking.
iturama
- 20 Jul 2005 17:46
- 7604 of 27111
It is the WT trades that are distorting the market - at the expense of the little guy. Institutions placing orders with brokers at agreed prices, or better, that don't show up till late in the day. So the traders walk the price to satisfy the deal agreement.
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 18:14
- 7605 of 27111
1,379,501 trades on VirtX now laddies.
bosley
- 20 Jul 2005 18:15
- 7606 of 27111
are all trades on virtx sells?
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 18:18
- 7607 of 27111
impossible to tell, take 50/50 if you are long. more if you are short- but one thing is for sure tomorrow will be another down day without some profit figures- and good ones.
ps my instinct is that they are losing shares on VirtX,out of sight- the reason will soon be known- if true.
insiderinside
- 20 Jul 2005 18:31
- 7608 of 27111
People are still in denial - still thinking some more spin in an RNS can save them - SEO is IMO heading for where its fundamentals say it should be - its worth no more than 5p a share IMO - add in some for future prospects so nobody should be surprised to see between 10p and 15p levels !
I say again - it has 1000 orders in the price - there are only 2 confirmed orders and IMO the plan has gone wrong - from the trades you see going through nobody knows if they are sells or buys - but IMO there is heavy dumping going on.
Welcome to the dump side of pump and dump - you enjoyed the pump - now see the dump.
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 18:36
- 7609 of 27111
my favourite posters are the ones like the two dorks who appeared this afternoon,
patently multi-aliases-agreeing with each other-the pattern is always the same as the shares they hold fall, and ramping has failed dismally, they reserve the brown liquid sloshing around in their crania, for massive , but rare efforts of brain-cell co-ordination, limping away for months to renew the batteries- goes something like---
`
XYTRRY -
I `ave no interest in this share or any share that you do not hold, I finds it `ard to read,but anyway I fink you are a f%^$*g, c&&t if you fink anyfin`. So be a good little boy and let everyone, enjoy this BB, or I will get the men in their white coats to remove that computer from your padded cell.
dat all roit warder-ta mite!!!!!!!!!
----
magic!!!!!!!!!
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 18:37
- 7610 of 27111
there you go 5p it is then
insiderinside
- 20 Jul 2005 18:38
- 7611 of 27111
Selling makes the price go down - is the price going down ? If the answer is yes then stop wishing and dreaming those WT are buys - they are sells - and big sells.
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 18:45
- 7612 of 27111
ROFLOL!!!!!!!!!!
Exactly!!!!!!!!!
insiderinside
- 20 Jul 2005 18:45
- 7613 of 27111
Now we get some very unclever chap saying "institutions" brought in at the placing - well sadly as I said at the time - they did not - how many holdings RNS have you seen ? None ? It said "supported" and thats all - yes some brokers took the shares and happily sold them all - wake up - hello - what no profits ? what no sales ? what no revenue ? what no holdings RNS ? nothing but jam tomorrow promise - and that jam is now too thin to spread - and when the jam runs out - correction occurs - have a nice evening all.
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 19:13
- 7615 of 27111
actually its even worse "modest support" was the RNS
cue the loonies
"1 by Xmas , you are a pervert for denying this, I will report you to abuse, infantile regression,degenerate whoofter- F off etc."-
and all over a penny share, I have made more money today trading the DOW up and down , than you could make on this dog in 6 months, get real lads and dump it, buy back at 17p for a bounce, and then dump again.
ptholden
- 20 Jul 2005 19:15
- 7616 of 27111
No doubt about it Seq, you have contributed in no small way to ensuring that this thread has become unreadable. Your continued abuse of PM and gloating over both his edited post and demise of the SEO SP is something for which you should feel no credit whatsoever, in fact entirely the opposite. Personally I am ambivalent to PM, I am happy to avail myself of his research, but at the same time am not afraid to question any of his posts / statements, but unlike you I do so in a reasonable manner. As far as I am concerned, the style in which you post (confrontational / abusive / belittling) is no different to when PM called you a 'low life piece of shit'. My concern is that PM has apparently received a slapped wrist whilst, you, continue to post in the same way without censure. Seems to be a case of AM double standards in operation here, and in my opinion this thread is just like reading a thread on ADVFN......not really worth the trouble.
No doubt I will receive some measure of personal abuse from you for this post (actually I would expect nothing less) but I live happy in the knowledge that I have been verbally abused by better people than you.
pth
aldwickk
- 20 Jul 2005 19:24
- 7617 of 27111
Thats the best post i have read today, pth.