The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Yer right ladsas predictable as dil being drunk on a Saturday

....... or as predictable as MDX dying? ;-)))))))

Apparently they are thinking of approaching Madoff for advice.

And his PRClubman

tabby...you said the fund rasining was a done deal....i am confused...as you said you are never wrong but to be fair i dont think i have seen you call anything about this mess correctly

Trig Judge me on the re-list.not too much to ask mate.

tabby there is not going to be any re-list....dude...wake up smell the coffee and move on....it is knackered

Sounds like a "best 19" to me. ;-))))))))

It's always a case of "Oh, I'll be right eventually" with you isn't it, Tabatha? Until that highly improbably moment it would seem the bears are right, right, right, right, right and right again.

Take that back to you "ring" with my best wishes. ;-)))))

Got any more room in that ring? There's probably a pretty large pineapple blocking access. ROFLMAO!

Trig.do you get a new broom and a 10 every time you use the phrase move on???
Ive told you... Barry dont come second.and believe me he is on our sidekeep it realdont drop to the depths of bouncy

I doubt he'll come second to you pathetic PIs, ;-))))))))

How is the fishing?...is it windy on the rig?....

Fishing on this thread is an abolute doddle, my little snapper. LOL!

What's your average price tabby ... 28p ?


I think we can pass judgement now.

B J Muncaster - 25 Jul'09 - 06:31 - 10847 of 11939


sunsetwarrior,

It is illegal to offer securities in the US without filing a registration document with the SEC. We couldn't afford the cost of doing so.



Anyone know that cost of this?

Brilliant!


orvil - 25 Jul'09 - 10:01 - 10922 of 11946


There are too many people on this board with the best intentions, but no real ability to bring off what they are espousing. The deal as outlined originally has failed-end of. The revised deal at 2p has not failed and an attempt is being made to lower the rate of entry.If you shareholders who think you know best were all put in a room together I guarantee there would be no consensus. In stead of trying to appease every shareholder, which is an impossibility, try putting some money in to save the company. The dilution at 2p for those who subscribe is virtually no worse than at 10p, only those who do not subscribe will feel the full force of the dilution, but at least they will have a company, that can succeed, whereas if the money is not raised they won't. There is no agreement on the loan proposal, and it would fail as miserably as the 10p offer through lack of support. Stop pontificating as if you know best and get your cheque books out. At the hourly rate of a road sweeper most of you regulars could have spent the time on this board earning enough money to pay for an scln.

Interesting


B J Muncaster - 25 Jul'09 - 10:55 - 10960 of 11947


Shaden,

I understand your points. The reality is, that regardless of what we were told in the past, none of the core-techs are at a saleable stage; they all require funds and management to bring to a saleable proposition. We've proritised the ones we think are lowest risk, lowest fudning requirement and fastest to establishing value. I thought we'd made this prefectly clear in both our presentation and in the Chairman's letter.

The question facing shareholders who do have the financial ability to support us is "do we have the right people to do the job"? That's for shareholders to decide. I think we do, but I would, wouldn't I?

Dilyou are miles awaybut stop digging.remember they dipped under the suspended price.Kapeesh

Big Al - 27 Jul 2009 09:43 - 7603 of 7619
Well, it would appear the thickest person on the BBs called this one spot on over several years and you were not as lucky as you profess to be, and I can't see anyne around here putting the word "shrewd" in the same sentence as "tabasco".

shrewd? no. Screwed? Certainly.

B J Muncaster - 25 Jul'09 - 19:48 - 11313 of 11962


crawford,

We can look at limiting it to, say, 9M. We really do need more than 6M if we're to forge ahead on all fronts.

GausieI see mummy has given you your pocket money todayare you going to short M&S with it again? Now that was shrewd!I cant see anyone around here putting the word "mummy" in a sentence without Gausie