bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 18:18
- 7607 of 27111
impossible to tell, take 50/50 if you are long. more if you are short- but one thing is for sure tomorrow will be another down day without some profit figures- and good ones.
ps my instinct is that they are losing shares on VirtX,out of sight- the reason will soon be known- if true.
insiderinside
- 20 Jul 2005 18:31
- 7608 of 27111
People are still in denial - still thinking some more spin in an RNS can save them - SEO is IMO heading for where its fundamentals say it should be - its worth no more than 5p a share IMO - add in some for future prospects so nobody should be surprised to see between 10p and 15p levels !
I say again - it has 1000 orders in the price - there are only 2 confirmed orders and IMO the plan has gone wrong - from the trades you see going through nobody knows if they are sells or buys - but IMO there is heavy dumping going on.
Welcome to the dump side of pump and dump - you enjoyed the pump - now see the dump.
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 18:36
- 7609 of 27111
my favourite posters are the ones like the two dorks who appeared this afternoon,
patently multi-aliases-agreeing with each other-the pattern is always the same as the shares they hold fall, and ramping has failed dismally, they reserve the brown liquid sloshing around in their crania, for massive , but rare efforts of brain-cell co-ordination, limping away for months to renew the batteries- goes something like---
`
XYTRRY -
I `ave no interest in this share or any share that you do not hold, I finds it `ard to read,but anyway I fink you are a f%^$*g, c&&t if you fink anyfin`. So be a good little boy and let everyone, enjoy this BB, or I will get the men in their white coats to remove that computer from your padded cell.
dat all roit warder-ta mite!!!!!!!!!
----
magic!!!!!!!!!
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 18:37
- 7610 of 27111
there you go 5p it is then
insiderinside
- 20 Jul 2005 18:38
- 7611 of 27111
Selling makes the price go down - is the price going down ? If the answer is yes then stop wishing and dreaming those WT are buys - they are sells - and big sells.
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 18:45
- 7612 of 27111
ROFLOL!!!!!!!!!!
Exactly!!!!!!!!!
insiderinside
- 20 Jul 2005 18:45
- 7613 of 27111
Now we get some very unclever chap saying "institutions" brought in at the placing - well sadly as I said at the time - they did not - how many holdings RNS have you seen ? None ? It said "supported" and thats all - yes some brokers took the shares and happily sold them all - wake up - hello - what no profits ? what no sales ? what no revenue ? what no holdings RNS ? nothing but jam tomorrow promise - and that jam is now too thin to spread - and when the jam runs out - correction occurs - have a nice evening all.
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 19:13
- 7615 of 27111
actually its even worse "modest support" was the RNS
cue the loonies
"1 by Xmas , you are a pervert for denying this, I will report you to abuse, infantile regression,degenerate whoofter- F off etc."-
and all over a penny share, I have made more money today trading the DOW up and down , than you could make on this dog in 6 months, get real lads and dump it, buy back at 17p for a bounce, and then dump again.
ptholden
- 20 Jul 2005 19:15
- 7616 of 27111
No doubt about it Seq, you have contributed in no small way to ensuring that this thread has become unreadable. Your continued abuse of PM and gloating over both his edited post and demise of the SEO SP is something for which you should feel no credit whatsoever, in fact entirely the opposite. Personally I am ambivalent to PM, I am happy to avail myself of his research, but at the same time am not afraid to question any of his posts / statements, but unlike you I do so in a reasonable manner. As far as I am concerned, the style in which you post (confrontational / abusive / belittling) is no different to when PM called you a 'low life piece of shit'. My concern is that PM has apparently received a slapped wrist whilst, you, continue to post in the same way without censure. Seems to be a case of AM double standards in operation here, and in my opinion this thread is just like reading a thread on ADVFN......not really worth the trouble.
No doubt I will receive some measure of personal abuse from you for this post (actually I would expect nothing less) but I live happy in the knowledge that I have been verbally abused by better people than you.
pth
aldwickk
- 20 Jul 2005 19:24
- 7617 of 27111
Thats the best post i have read today, pth.
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 20:25
- 7618 of 27111
ptholden - 20 Jul 2005 19:15 - 7616 of 7617
No doubt about it Seq, you have contributed in no small way to ensuring that this thread has become unreadable. Your continued abuse of PM and gloating over both his edited post and demise of the SEO SP is something for which you should feel no credit whatsoever, in fact entirely the opposite. Personally I am ambivalent to PM, I am happy to avail myself of his research, but at the same time am not afraid to question any of his posts / statements, but unlike you I do so in a reasonable manner. As far as I am concerned, the style in which you post (confrontational / abusive / belittling) is no different to when PM called you a 'low life piece of shit'. My concern is that PM has apparently received a slapped wrist whilst, you, continue to post in the same way without censure. Seems to be a case of AM double standards in operation here, and in my opinion this thread is just like reading a thread on ADVFN......not really worth the trouble.
No doubt I will receive some measure of personal abuse from you for this post (actually I would expect nothing less) but I live happy in the knowledge that I have been verbally abused by better people than you.
pth
-
EDITED MoneyAM, franKly I don`t give a damn what you and your aliases think- live or die- its not my problem.
I am making 000.000`s shorting this dog- join me- I doubt if you can tho`, so, do bog off and watch tele, I have a punt on the DOW to sort- p.s. paul- I have reported you AGAIN for abuse- do give in wee man.
As for giving YOU abuse -I couldn`t even offer you one F-do go away you boring wee man.
byeee!!!
ps aldwick- get a mouth wash dearie, that licking is subject to nastY germs!!!!!!
ROTFLMFATB&HO!!!!!
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 20:32
- 7619 of 27111
Basic user information
MoneyAM Username: ptholden
Real name: unknown
Location: somewhere in the ether
Biography
no biographical information given
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 20:32
- 7620 of 27111
Basic user information
MoneyAM Username: aldwickk
Real name: unknown
Location: somewhere in the ether
Biography
no biographical information given
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 20:33
- 7621 of 27111
Basic user information
MoneyAM Username: prodman
Real name: unknown
Location: somewhere in the ether
Biography
no biographical information
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 20:38
- 7622 of 27111
Not a clue then
three lonely people together-AHHHH!!!!!!!!
Aldwickk
ptholden
and the most feeble-poor old prodman- did it stir when prodded????????
ROTFLMFACBHS&HO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
garyble
- 20 Jul 2005 20:52
- 7623 of 27111
II,
You are fun!
Holdings announcement => 3%, this implies somwhere in the region of 30,000,000 shares. Count the noughts {you need both hands}. At the rate the shares are traded, it would most likely take a couple of months to accumulate. IMHO.
ptholden
- 20 Jul 2005 21:02
- 7624 of 27111
Seq
Just the kind of response I anticipated, although possibly more vitriolic. I will take the context of your allegation and consider it at my leisure.
You will note if you bother to look, that all poster's profiles read 'somehwere in the ether' it is the AM default setting. Surprised you haven't realised that.......oh, maybe not.
pth
Sequestor
- 20 Jul 2005 21:13
- 7625 of 27111
yes I did -default all you like this dog is going to 17p
sleep well!!!!!!!