Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

and its MPs from all parties . is it worth voting , lets change the system

76260 - fred - no one disputes the intrinsic accuracy of the reported recording so bluster as much as you like, it is (pretty) factual reporting via papers that could scarcely be described as pro tory

Manuel,

The article you indicated seems to me to have been based on the meaning the word “affiliated”.

Many individuals are affiliated to "clubs", "organisations", "companies", "collectives" but don’t hold the same “views” as the majority of the other affiliates or “members”.

Look at the bunch of ragtags who are members of the con party.

Labour in disarray.... NO

"Freda" in tinted glasses as usual

Labour's deputy leader says left-wing supporters of Jeremy Corbyn are involved in a plot which could destroy the party as an electoral force.

Tom Watson was reacting to claims that the grassroots Momentum group - which helped make Mr Corbyn leader - is hoping to get financial support from Britain's largest trade union, Unite.

Momentum's Jon Lansman was reportedly taped saying that if Len McCluskey was re-elected as Unite general secretary, the union would affiliate to his group rather than just to Labour

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39325559

Hot air.

so because it does not suit fred's political leanings, tom watson must be spouting hot air and mccluskey the truth

my view is that the reverse is far more likely to be true

Of course, you are not biased!

of course not, but even if i were, i'ld still look at the probability and, if i were honest with myself (which i am), would come to the same conclusion

Don't know why anybody responds to Fred's posts he clearly has an agenda to wind as many people up as only he can. He's been playing this game for years, ignore.

Where's jimmy anyone know .

"if i were honest with myself (which i am)",

Is that a delusion?

-=-=-==-=-=


Sums up the week.

re - Labour in disarray?
NO, just in full

neither delusion nor illusion :-)

Apparently a deranged Bhudist monk has gone on a murderous rampage in
central London, the authorities are awaiting a response from the religion of
peace on this disruption to their daily lives of 5 times a day prayers..

A statement is to be made by the police shortly, and it is expected to try
and reassure those from the muslim community that this act of murderous
terrorism does not reflect badly on them, and that their religion is truly a
religion of peace and no one should think otherwise!!.

And your raison d'être is?

is that the correct usage?
je pense que non! :-)

re - raison d'être is?

Je pense est correct

Bon nuit

Don't read this Fred, it will fry your circuits good an proper.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4340290/Truth-t-like-says-KATIE-HOPKINS.html#ixzz4c69SI4FN

They're interviewing the deputy speaker of the HoP, and he's giving the
impression that it's them versus us(HoP), "we are a village and one of
our police officers have been killed, but we will come through this stronger."

Its the liberal multi-cultural fools like them that have being complicite in the
rise in these attacks in Europe, in one speech by a Scotland yard spokesman
stated "we don't want to give ammunition to the 'far right'...

For feck sake, they find any reason to try and put the 'far right' on the same
level as these invaders, or enemies within, if it turns out they're 'British', when
being patriotic is to be classed an enemy of the state.