moneyman
- 03 Nov 2005 21:50
This one looks quite interesting - IDN
MACD and RSI both positive and a break through the top Bollinger should see new levels being attained.
Has been in a down turn for some time and for no specific reason. Brokers estimate an EPS of .26 for FY05 and .31 for FY06 on a rough guide PE of 15 and taking no consideration for tax benefits it looks very cheap. The company is profitable and Seymour Pierce have recently issued an outperform recommendation.
Price 03/11/05 = 2.3 to buy
Haystack
- 25 Jul 2006 00:01
- 77 of 122
A rising share price is not an indication that it is not over-priced.
ptholden
- 25 Jul 2006 00:09
- 78 of 122
Nope, but in the short term - you got it wrong. Plain and simple.
Haystack
- 25 Jul 2006 00:20
- 79 of 122
I am not discussing the short term. I am saying I think it is over-valued. SPs may goup and down. The longer term will tell if I am right. As I don't bhave a position on DVS then it is of litle importance to me if it goes up or down in the short term. If you have made money on it then good luck to you. Mind you a profit is not a profit until you are out of the stock.
Haystack
- 25 Jul 2006 11:54
- 80 of 122
A few trades which could be buys or sells, but another MM has dropped the price. I expect this to be much lower soon.
ptholden
- 25 Jul 2006 12:27
- 81 of 122
Online prices are 2.06 v 2.08
Reasonably safe to assume the trades at 2.08 are Buys, at least have the good grace to admit so, afterall you never have any doubt when posting, 'all Sells today'
Accepted the point about MM dropping prices.
Haystack
- 25 Jul 2006 14:08
- 82 of 122
The 2.08 trades are exactly at the mid price, so they could be buys or sells. The fact that an MM has dropped the price may be an indication that the trades were SELLS.
There is only one MM now above 2p for the bid at 2.05. The others are one at 1.95p, one at 1.9p and three at 1.85p.
The price is 2.05 v 2.1
ptholden
- 25 Jul 2006 14:26
- 83 of 122
As I said Haystack, I tested the on line prices first thing this morning and also after the trades at the time of my post which have consitently been 2.06-2.08. . Can't understand why you won't accept the trades were buys and take a more balanced view. However, it looks like the SP is going to fall.
Haystack
- 26 Jul 2006 17:01
- 84 of 122
SELLS against BUYs more than 4 to 1 - a lot of downward pressure.
ptholden
- 26 Jul 2006 20:10
- 85 of 122
Yep a whopping 0.015% of the company traded in one day, this is clearly massive downward pressure. Behave yerself Haystack, you really should moderate your comments within the boundaries of common sense. In your one man crusade against small telecom companies, you are beginning to lose yer grip and show yourself up. Consecutive days of biased misinformed blatant de-ramping now.
pth
Haystack
- 26 Jul 2006 21:09
- 87 of 122
Would you say it was in a downward trend?
ptholden
- 26 Jul 2006 21:23
- 88 of 122
Have never said it wasn't Haystack, but your comment today '4-1 blah blah' related to today's trades. Now you see those charts are worth posting, they tell a story, grabbing sells of 60,000 to try and prove your point is kinda, well, pathetic really. As I said, get a grip amd do be more moderate with your wilder comments ;-)
pth
canary9
- 29 Jul 2006 10:52
- 91 of 122
At least I'm not the only one that considers this a buy! Nice write up in the Independent today.
http://money.independent.co.uk/personal_finance/invest_save/article1201856.ece
Haystack
- 29 Jul 2006 20:03
- 92 of 122
The Independent article doesn't read that way to me. It sounds a bit based on hope.
"My hope is IDN will trade its way out of the basement.".
canary9
- 31 Jul 2006 09:48
- 93 of 122
Nice to see some blue today!
IDN Telecom PLC
28 July 2006
IDN Telecom plc
('the Company')
Holding in Company
The Company was informed today that Gartmore Investment Limited purchased
1,000,000 ordinary shares in the capital of the Company on 24 July 2006, and is
now interested in 11,834,654 ordinary shares in the capital of the Company,
representing 3.05% of the entire issued ordinary share capital of the Company.
For further information please visit
www.idn.co.uk
or contact:
Mike Morrison, Managing Director, 0870 777 1775
Gordon Hermiston, Finance Director, 0870 777 1775
Jeremy Porter, Seymour Pierce Limited, 020 7107 8000
ptholden
- 31 Jul 2006 14:49
- 95 of 122
You going to post L2 today Haystack. Oh, I very much doubt it, you only post when the facts suit your argument.
Well, just for information there are now only two MM BELOW 2p, SCAP and WINS at 1.95p, the remaining four are above 2p.
To say that SELLs are outnumbering BUYS day after day, is at best misleading, at worst a bare faced lie. Since I have been posting on this thread, that just simply is not true.
I don't know why you have a bee in your bonnet about IDN, but you really are the worst kind of poster when it comes to a balanced view. Fine, be negative by all means, each have their own opinion, but why not try to be fair to both sides of the argument? Somehow, I very much doubt you have that ability, which is somewhat surprising, because you are clearly a very balanced person - a massive chip on each shoulder!
pth
Haystack
- 31 Jul 2006 15:32
- 96 of 122
Not quite right. One MM is exactly on 2p and not above itnand that one hasn't moved at at all today.
I have never claimed to give a balanced view or be fair to both sides. I don't like IDN as a stock and I am bearish about it. You give bullish views and I give bearish ones. Recently SELLS were outnumbering BUYS and the price has been falling steadily for months. Today that isn't the case and the price has risen. A piece in the the Independent may have caused that.
The fact that the price has risen doesn't change my mind about IDN, nor would it if it doubled in price.