goldfinger
- 09 Jun 2005 12:25
Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).
Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.
cheers GF.
jimmy b
- 24 May 2017 09:07
- 77020 of 81564
No condemnation from Fred as expected yesterday just some snide remarks ,well done again Fred .
2517GEORGE
- 24 May 2017 10:04
- 77021 of 81564
How on earth was Diane Abbott passed as fit to hold the office of an MP
iturama
- 24 May 2017 11:10
- 77023 of 81564
No, lovely wall but mine is going to be even more beautiful. And more useful. This one's got holes in it.
VICTIM
- 24 May 2017 11:52
- 77024 of 81564
British born , Libyan parents the murderer suspect , went over to Libya and came back here in the last few days . BBC news .
Fred1new
- 24 May 2017 12:03
- 77025 of 81564
Shocking.
Failure of English educational system.
Should have been indoctrinated properly.
VICTIM
- 24 May 2017 12:05
- 77026 of 81564
A bit like yourself then Freda , similar lines there .
grannyboy
- 24 May 2017 12:43
- 77027 of 81564
'After hearing of the Manchester terrorist attack, politicians once more
communicate their by now old-routine of "shock" and "grief" its the predictable
outcome of their own policies'
'Everytime a European leader publicly endorses Islam as a great faith, a religion
of peace, or claims that violence in Islam is a "perversion of great faith", despite
the massive evidence to the contrary, they signal in the strongest way possible
that with every devastating attack the west is ripe for the taking.'
https/www.gatestoneinsitute.org/10408/manchester-bombing-shock
grannyboy
- 24 May 2017 12:59
- 77028 of 81564
"There are several hundred square meters of pavement abandoned to men alone;
Women are no longer considered entitled to be there, cafes, bars and restaurants
are prohibited to them, as are the sidewalks, subway station and the public squares"
'Le Parisien'
https//www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10404/france-no-go-zones
cynic
- 24 May 2017 13:02
- 77029 of 81564
i think gatestone is as reliable (and predictable) in its own way as is the daily mail or the socialist worker
grannyboy
- 24 May 2017 13:05
- 77030 of 81564
Islam is totally incompatable with western culture and beliefs, and so long as
more are welcomed the worse it will get.
Lebanon was a majority christian country until the muslims was allowed in,
now its majority islam..
Tunisia and Morroco was christian majority countries until the muslim invasions.
grannyboy
- 24 May 2017 13:07
- 77031 of 81564
You might not think much of it but you never thought much of Nigel Farage,
simply because they ALL speak the truth, and truth is something YOU deniers
do NOT want to hear...
grannyboy
- 24 May 2017 13:15
- 77032 of 81564
Frau Merkel sends her condolencies....
Well she need not bother the treacherous shit...Its down to her policies that
has facilitated the destruction of Europe...
Yes thank you you dumb traitorous bint, who's hands are covered in the blood of
her own citizens and those in other european countries, including those children
in Manchester ....
ExecLine
- 24 May 2017 13:17
- 77033 of 81564
grannyboy
You missed the colon (:) out of the URL address. I wonder, therefore, if you do not know how to 'Copy and Paste'?
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10404/france-no-go-zones
MoneyAM have also provided a really neat tool for assisting posters in the provison of a 'URL address link'. The tool is indicated above the posting box as a link in a chain symbol (

)
A 'left click' on it opens it up for you to use.
Learn how to Copy and Paste
HERE
grannyboy
- 24 May 2017 13:28
- 77034 of 81564
Troops to be deployed on Britains streets...
These islamist scum who the authorities are supposed to be aware of should
be rounded up and put in camps if they are unable to find out which shithole they
came from, instead of being free to walk the streets with bombs strapped to
their backs.
It tells you all you need to know when this is what is happening, that not being
able to go about our free way due to those from the intolerant religion..
grannyboy
- 24 May 2017 13:30
- 77035 of 81564
Thank you EL, i'l give it a try.
cynic
- 24 May 2017 13:42
- 77036 of 81564
why not round them all up into wembley stadium and then machine gun them all? ....... or perhaps just let the millwall and chelsea supporters at 'em?
2517GEORGE
- 24 May 2017 13:51
- 77037 of 81564
In the main we Brits are a tolerant race, we have accepted peoples from around the world who wish to settle here, and generally we get on with them and vice versa, and we integrated, within these people there were always a minority who caused trouble whether it was gang culture/drugs/vice, but they did not prevent the majority of us from getting on with our lives.
Unfortunately that cannot be said of the minority of Muslims who are intent on killing and harming as many of us as they can, there is no way that they will integrate they want to destroy us. I feel that there has been enough joining hands, strong words and outpourings from our politicians, (and other Western governments).
Fred1new
- 24 May 2017 14:27
- 77038 of 81564
Manuel,
Did you mean Gallstone site?
-=-=-==
Don't like what chelsea or millwall.
Shoot them as well.
-=-=-=-=
2517,
It is a pity we invaded their countries in the first place and imbued them with "British standards" or "morality".
I know quite a few who pertain to being Christians and I wouldn't like to shake hand with them.
Have to count my fingers afterwards.
ExecLine
- 24 May 2017 14:59
- 77039 of 81564
A couple of mornings ago, the door-bell rang.
"I wonder if we could take a few minutes of your time to talk with you about the love of God?"
"No. I'm sorry to have to tell you, that we are atheists in this house."
I would suppose, that the two callers, one being an immaculately groomed, very neatly dressed, sorta, kinda, 'managerially-styled' guy and the other a much younger female, very smart companion, were Jehovah's Witness Crusaders.
Do they do any harm? I would suppose not - but that's only if you stay on the surface of this organisation. Delve a bit deeper and the mechanics of a massive, very strict, very demanding set-up with terrible punishments for those who don't follow the prescribed ways, begins to be revealed.
They are ruled by very powerful senior people and their church has to sustain itself with the very thing that God does not provide. ie. Money. I suppose I’m wrong, but I do feel, that’s what their ‘crusading’ is all about’. Namely getting new church members, growing the organisation and swelling its coffers.
One would suppose the followers are mostly 'morally good'. So, what's the harm in it?
And very much the same with most other religions. They do preach a lot of good morality so you can't easily 'knock them'.
And if, as a politician, you don't illustrate whilst you are campaigning, that you are somehow 'morally good' or belong to the 'morally good camp', then you are not going to get very far. Common sense, isn't it? Quite 'hypocrital' too, isn't it? As we watch these politicians and similar doing their 'election thingies', they may easily appear to some to be ‘two-faced bar stewards' but to others they are definitley showing a membership of the ‘good morals code camp’. (eg. I'm thinking of Trump and his 'ladies' in their designer dresses and conventional veils and similar and similar and similar, when these types of people visit the Pope).
So why are my wife and I atheists?
Well, we watch a bit of TV, you know. We also watch a fair few YouTube clips as well. We watch programmes with the likes of Stephen Hawkin and Richard Dawkin in them and professing what they know to be common sense and reason, all backed up with scientific fact and with mysticism completely stripped out of it. These guys prove the universe created itself and that a 'creator god' wasn't required for it to happen. They explain , how scientifically, it just happened in a process which we call 'big bang'.
So, as there was never a need for a god. Neither is there a use for one for anything else either. And neither can there be an 'afterlife' or any way of getting one. They explain, how when you die you just cease to be. This is extremely hard to accept, if you aren’t a very strong, self-reliant sort of person. If you are the sort of person who really does need to have a lot of ‘hope’ in your life, then all of this and its implications is almost impossible to accept.
Many, many people ask, "What is the purpose of life?"
I ask, "Why should life have to have a purpose?" I just accept, that like any other form of life on this planet, I just happen to be here. As a life form with a consciousness, I try to make the very best of it and also, I try to appreciate lots about it, too. I will be so sorry when it has to end. So sorry, that I don’t want that to ever happen. I really do try to value it very highly and I would hope to remind and persuade others to feel the same.
Because people ask the 'purpose question' along come others, usually those originating from the heads of all the different churches out there, to provide an answer. It's usually to do with 'gaining an after-life when you die'. They then usually say, you can only get the ‘after-life’ bit if you belong to ’OUR Church’. They would have you suppose, that all other churches and religions have ‘got it wrong’.
I think the ‘purpose question’ is a fallacy - as are the answers. Both sides of it are quite daft.
I think that people should be asking, "What are the best ways I can live my life?"
All in all, I'd like all religions to completely collapse. But I do strongly see a need to put something back in their place.
Perhaps a 'Universal Creed'? Hmmm? Whatever. That’s the hard bit.
You can’t take something so important away, without putting something similarly important back in its place.
I do strongly believe, that the destruction of all religions is the key and provides the absolute solution to ending religious terrorism.