| Home | Log In | Register | Our Services | My Account | Contact | Help |
You are NOT currently logged in
Register now or login to post to this thread.
Coffee Heaven - A heavenly share for penny punters ? (COH)
overgrowth
- 06 Oct 2003 22:47
 A
busy day in the Warsaw Underground ! |
Not just another coffee shop chain - this one is a brand leader and is only trading in Eastern/Central Europe (i.e. the countries recently admitted to the EU destined for substantial business growth). The company is creating new outlets at a fair old pace and take a look at their website - these are quality stores in high-profile locations like major airports, railway stations etc. Website: http://www.coffeeheaven.eu.com |
|
APRIL 2006 TRADING UPDATE!!! Total Gross Revenues for 12 months to 31st March up 66% to £6.3M (2005: £3.8M) Lots more info. on new markets and stores click here to read the full details. Stores: 43 (up from 32) stores currently trading (Poland: 30 (up from 23), Czech Republic: 6 (Up from 2), Latvia: 7 with a further 5 units under construction including Bulgaria and sites secured in Romania (subject contract). Bulgaria & Romania are seeking to join the EU from January 2007. Sites located in key high street, shopping malls or Airport locations. Company growth target: increase number of units by at least 20 units to some 63 units by 31 March 2007. Aim being to achieve this level of growth within present Cash resources.Cash balances at 31 March 2006 were approximately £2.9M (2005: £0.7M). Debt was nil (2005: £ 2.5M): Nil Debt! Positive EBITDA: For the year ending 31 March 2006, Group EBITDA expected to be firmly positive after charging UK and new market development costs but before exceptional costs relating to the cancellation of bonds (previous Debt). Forecasts: Based on present trading conditions and current exchange rates we anticipate indicative sales of £9.3M for the year to 31 March 2007. This includes indicative sales of £0.4M from Bulgaria, which will be reported but not consolidated. From Richard Worthington (Chairman and Chief Executive): ‘The new financial year has started well. There is no doubt that the significant economic improvement in our markets is feeding through to consumer confidence and spending. The strength of the coffeeheaven brand ensures we are ideally positioned to benefit from our customers' increasing prosperity.’ |
bmw325 - 20 May 2007 19:49 - 775 of 2037
He is banned on iii
AdieH
- 21 May 2007 08:25
- 776 of 2037
Yes I know that is my i'm encouraging people to migrate for now... did he not realise that we know he is waxman... and he's previous deramping was to 14p...
David10B
- 21 May 2007 08:39
- 777 of 2037
Dear AdieH
Good morning.
Surely there is no need to resort to frabrication.
Far from being waxman or banned from iii, is the truth of the issue.
I dont not have any personal vendetta against COH or its board I simply comment on the conduct thereof, and in the continued absence of an RNS in order to clarify the recent share disposals, such comments would definately appear to be possitively well founded.
The only problem with following your advice and directing people to the COH BB on iii is that the whole BB is totally misleading as to the facts.
However, when in a rampers paradise I suppose that the best that one can expect.
Meanwhile kindly let the SP do the talking and try to relax and enjoy your week.
By the way please note my prediction for MLR is well and truly on tract and should see 30p very soon.
Furthermore COH is now down a full 7 points since I predicted here that it would fall.
I would like to think that my research is going in the right direction.
Good morning.
Surely there is no need to resort to frabrication.
Far from being waxman or banned from iii, is the truth of the issue.
I dont not have any personal vendetta against COH or its board I simply comment on the conduct thereof, and in the continued absence of an RNS in order to clarify the recent share disposals, such comments would definately appear to be possitively well founded.
The only problem with following your advice and directing people to the COH BB on iii is that the whole BB is totally misleading as to the facts.
However, when in a rampers paradise I suppose that the best that one can expect.
Meanwhile kindly let the SP do the talking and try to relax and enjoy your week.
By the way please note my prediction for MLR is well and truly on tract and should see 30p very soon.
Furthermore COH is now down a full 7 points since I predicted here that it would fall.
I would like to think that my research is going in the right direction.
David10B
- 21 May 2007 08:47
- 778 of 2037
Just to politely remind you of what has been stated here previously.
silvermede - 04 May 2007 11:25 - 567 of 777
Time to top up potentially.
AdieH - 04 May 2007 17:05 - 568 of 777
Yes institutions willing to pay the current sp for shares, director is topping up again (he knows a thing or two)... Would like to know where the captial is going but hey trust RW with my dosh... Target of 1.00 for me and hopefully within the year... Good Luck.
David10B - 04 May 2007 19:48 - 569 of 777
The only problem with this is yet again they come back to the market for even more money. Matters not its underwritten.
I feel they have missed the boat in not using the funds they raised 18 month ago.
Now there is heavy competition in a limited market and they have had 3 million approx just sitting in the bank----seems like living high off investors interest to me. AVIOD for the moment
Stockdog - 04 May 2007 21:06 - 570 of 777
david10B - utter crap, but respect your right to believe it.
AdieH - 04 May 2007 21:07 - 571 of 777
Really, so are they burning the cash pile NO if you check the
silvermede - 04 May 2007 11:25 - 567 of 777
Time to top up potentially.
AdieH - 04 May 2007 17:05 - 568 of 777
Yes institutions willing to pay the current sp for shares, director is topping up again (he knows a thing or two)... Would like to know where the captial is going but hey trust RW with my dosh... Target of 1.00 for me and hopefully within the year... Good Luck.
David10B - 04 May 2007 19:48 - 569 of 777
The only problem with this is yet again they come back to the market for even more money. Matters not its underwritten.
I feel they have missed the boat in not using the funds they raised 18 month ago.
Now there is heavy competition in a limited market and they have had 3 million approx just sitting in the bank----seems like living high off investors interest to me. AVIOD for the moment
Stockdog - 04 May 2007 21:06 - 570 of 777
david10B - utter crap, but respect your right to believe it.
AdieH - 04 May 2007 21:07 - 571 of 777
Really, so are they burning the cash pile NO if you check the
proteus - 21 May 2007 14:42 - 779 of 2037
10B,
Well I've waited quite a few days now.Surely if you're confident of a fall you must have some idea of the next years P/L.I want to see the counter proposal to the Numis figures before I draw any conclusions on investment.
Well I've waited quite a few days now.Surely if you're confident of a fall you must have some idea of the next years P/L.I want to see the counter proposal to the Numis figures before I draw any conclusions on investment.
AdieH
- 21 May 2007 14:45
- 780 of 2037
Funny a positive day and someone is very quiet... Strange we haven't had a RNS to update on holdings... Maybe EMPIK are retaining a certain amount of their holdings... Does anyone know how long before they have to inform the company of their reduction in holdings (if it is them)?
David10B
- 21 May 2007 15:15
- 781 of 2037
All in good time my friend, all in good time.
Meanwhile I really do take my hat off to all the brave investors buying today.
I was confident of a fall from 48p if you recall. One big downward push is enough for now. The bigger one will come I have no doubt about that.
Meanwhile its patience when both buying and selling, as the market loves the irrational.
Meanwhile I really do take my hat off to all the brave investors buying today.
I was confident of a fall from 48p if you recall. One big downward push is enough for now. The bigger one will come I have no doubt about that.
Meanwhile its patience when both buying and selling, as the market loves the irrational.
David10B
- 21 May 2007 17:03
- 782 of 2037
Well chaps, one and all, the news is out and it was EMPIK dumping and fund raising with the issuing of more bonds.
You know these people at Empik have been in that market a long time and still seem to be cash pressed.
I dont really undertsand why.
However as I am leaving my investments in those countries in the hands of CFE I wont comment further.
That said and with the EMPIK deal now on the public domain, it is interesting to see a normally very communicative Mr Worthington----silent!
Have a pleasant eveing.
You know these people at Empik have been in that market a long time and still seem to be cash pressed.
I dont really undertsand why.
However as I am leaving my investments in those countries in the hands of CFE I wont comment further.
That said and with the EMPIK deal now on the public domain, it is interesting to see a normally very communicative Mr Worthington----silent!
Have a pleasant eveing.
AdieH
- 21 May 2007 17:11
- 783 of 2037
Why would he comment, he is not the CEO of EMPIK he's concern is with COH and as far as I can see the dumping of 10million shares has not really affected COH too much... those shares are being snapped up by other investors... please note the 1p rise today and please your earlier comment of shorting these from 48p please check your recent posts as your memory seems to be diminishing... you started your rant at 41/42p... get your facts correct please.
David10B
- 21 May 2007 17:28
- 784 of 2037
I most certainly stand correct sir and profundly apologise.
I picked that figure up from my notes whilst studing as to what what Mr Currie bought in at when Mr Worthington sold out part of his holdIng.
Please excuse my over sight.
I was unaware that I was ranting. I would have preferred you saying commenting, however if it makes you feel better then I certainly have no problem with your use of adjectives, given the price did indeed fall upon hearing my rants, sorry comments.
I trust this week goes as well for you as it is for CFE holders.
I picked that figure up from my notes whilst studing as to what what Mr Currie bought in at when Mr Worthington sold out part of his holdIng.
Please excuse my over sight.
I was unaware that I was ranting. I would have preferred you saying commenting, however if it makes you feel better then I certainly have no problem with your use of adjectives, given the price did indeed fall upon hearing my rants, sorry comments.
I trust this week goes as well for you as it is for CFE holders.
AdieH
- 21 May 2007 17:45
- 785 of 2037
Good luck to you in your investment in CFE, don't like the concept of Franchise myself as you eluded to before, even less asset based than COH... but I can see some potential there now they seem to have sorted their board out... Good Luck with that one will watch with interest.
AdieH
- 21 May 2007 19:25
- 786 of 2037
Message for CFE.
Fly you little devil, you deserve to, if not only on the efforts of the board of directors.
This is the kind of innovation that made British business great!
Make a bag full, chaps its looking better all the time.
Have a great day.
Wonder who is ramping on CFE... take a look it makes rather amusing reading considering the postings on here recently...
Fly you little devil, you deserve to, if not only on the efforts of the board of directors.
This is the kind of innovation that made British business great!
Make a bag full, chaps its looking better all the time.
Have a great day.
Wonder who is ramping on CFE... take a look it makes rather amusing reading considering the postings on here recently...
David10B
- 21 May 2007 19:51
- 787 of 2037
Far from it old chap just giving a hard working board the praise they fully deserve.
I cant for one moment imagin Barty keeping his shareholders in the dark during similar troubled as COH is in right now.
I genuinely believe in praise where its due.
I cant for one moment imagin Barty keeping his shareholders in the dark during similar troubled as COH is in right now.
I genuinely believe in praise where its due.
AdieH
- 21 May 2007 20:01
- 788 of 2037
Well for me COH and especially RW deserve more praise than the board of CFE... You give the impression of being someone who is trying to bring a balanced view and then off you go on CFE sounding like someone who has just discovered their first 2 bagger...
David10B
- 21 May 2007 20:11
- 789 of 2037
Well AdieH you sent me to ii as you said it made intersting reading there.
You were right.
It raised I question that I was not prepared to ask but was dying to.
As Mr Worthington has been ever so silent of late, did his in fact surpress the news that Empik was selling out?
Obviously as stated on iii Empik must have known they were pulling out when consulted over the proposed new issue.
Sorry chaps but two and two does not make four here.
Also I must add that I never found any trust in Mr Worthington, he has always been too quick to line his pkets, selling out in BKE and COH, as he did.
It is commonly accepted knowledge in this game that once a director sells out he leaves the compnies he sold out of a lot weaker and with confidence dented.
BKE is a fine example. Mr Worthington, claiming as he did, to have given free shares when forming the new company COH, but nothing is free, all that happen was BKE was asset stripped and Mr Worthington selling his shares was the coup de gre.
BKE was left in the hands of a highly paid, "non person" simply to stagnate at sharholders expense.
Perhaps its all catching up now, who knows, but whatever the situation is. it clearly demads an explantion or perhaps even an official investigation.
If Mr Worthington had wind that Empik was selling out and sold his shares, then carried on with the new issues, surely thats illegal.
What are your views AdieH please
You were right.
It raised I question that I was not prepared to ask but was dying to.
As Mr Worthington has been ever so silent of late, did his in fact surpress the news that Empik was selling out?
Obviously as stated on iii Empik must have known they were pulling out when consulted over the proposed new issue.
Sorry chaps but two and two does not make four here.
Also I must add that I never found any trust in Mr Worthington, he has always been too quick to line his pkets, selling out in BKE and COH, as he did.
It is commonly accepted knowledge in this game that once a director sells out he leaves the compnies he sold out of a lot weaker and with confidence dented.
BKE is a fine example. Mr Worthington, claiming as he did, to have given free shares when forming the new company COH, but nothing is free, all that happen was BKE was asset stripped and Mr Worthington selling his shares was the coup de gre.
BKE was left in the hands of a highly paid, "non person" simply to stagnate at sharholders expense.
Perhaps its all catching up now, who knows, but whatever the situation is. it clearly demads an explantion or perhaps even an official investigation.
If Mr Worthington had wind that Empik was selling out and sold his shares, then carried on with the new issues, surely thats illegal.
What are your views AdieH please
David10B
- 21 May 2007 20:17
- 790 of 2037
Far far from it AdieH, I just look at CFE at the begining of the year and compared it to today.
That sir is progress.
Then I look at Mr Worthington's excuses in BKE.
That sir is progress.
Then I look at Mr Worthington's excuses in BKE.
David10B
- 21 May 2007 20:59
- 791 of 2037
One more thing please, before I turn in, (god I love this game), and I really dont want to be a bore, but there seems to be talk of the EMPIK shares being bought, I can find any eveidence of this: In fact looking at the trades, of course they could be misreported, but there appears to have been a lot more than the EMPIK dump, dumped.
As ever I will stand corrected if need be.
Have a great evening.
As ever I will stand corrected if need be.
Have a great evening.
AdieH
- 21 May 2007 21:34
- 792 of 2037
So why isn't COH being marked down if the MM's are holding a huge hang over of shares... it went up today,you have to ask this question?
As to your allegations of corruption by RW I really do think you have to be careful what you are saying, it is bordering on slander and I don't think RW will take it too lightly.
I cannot understand what your beef is with Richard Worthington it is like you have a personal vendetta against him, has he really upset you that much or have you lost a fortune on BKE because that his the impression you are giving? You are in a minority if that is the case as previously stated holders of BKE got free shares and I would guess even if you are showing a loss on BKE it would be outweighted by your profits on COH...
Regards
As to your allegations of corruption by RW I really do think you have to be careful what you are saying, it is bordering on slander and I don't think RW will take it too lightly.
I cannot understand what your beef is with Richard Worthington it is like you have a personal vendetta against him, has he really upset you that much or have you lost a fortune on BKE because that his the impression you are giving? You are in a minority if that is the case as previously stated holders of BKE got free shares and I would guess even if you are showing a loss on BKE it would be outweighted by your profits on COH...
Regards
David10B
- 22 May 2007 08:42
- 793 of 2037
Good morning AdieH
No Sir I am sticking to my statements firmly: it would be inconceivable that Mr Worthington was not aware of the intention of EMPIK to dump its shares and nevertheless went ahead with the new placing.
That is my firm conclusion, whatever others derive from that is entirely up to them.
Mr Worthington is free to come here and make a statement should he so wish!
I really dont have any beef with Mr Worthington.
I was never a gambler in BKE.
My "beef" as you put is only with the lazy, incompetent, negliegent, and devious PLCs directors, of which there are many, who seem to be quite content to fiddle things, its the poor old PI that always gets shafted.
My "beef" could possibly be even more potent when directed towards the FSA!
I dont think that I will ever be able to figure out the intellect of the MMs
Turning back to BKE under its current management. I would really like to make a comparison with CARL and CFE etc, but I regret that I would not wish to turn my stomach this early in my day.
BKE shareholders really got shafted as it was a case of robbing Peter to pay Paul as simple as that.
I really dont find Mr Worthington, or certain of his associates to be men of intergrity.
This debate has lumbered on into territory it would be best out of.
I feel that you really should have let the SP to the talking as I suggested we do earlier , as perhaps now were are both embroiled in matters that although are probably best left unspoken, are long over due for an airing in an open forum.
I see this aspect of the debate going on and into further investigation and will only serve to weaken the COH share price from here on in!
No Sir I am sticking to my statements firmly: it would be inconceivable that Mr Worthington was not aware of the intention of EMPIK to dump its shares and nevertheless went ahead with the new placing.
That is my firm conclusion, whatever others derive from that is entirely up to them.
Mr Worthington is free to come here and make a statement should he so wish!
I really dont have any beef with Mr Worthington.
I was never a gambler in BKE.
My "beef" as you put is only with the lazy, incompetent, negliegent, and devious PLCs directors, of which there are many, who seem to be quite content to fiddle things, its the poor old PI that always gets shafted.
My "beef" could possibly be even more potent when directed towards the FSA!
I dont think that I will ever be able to figure out the intellect of the MMs
Turning back to BKE under its current management. I would really like to make a comparison with CARL and CFE etc, but I regret that I would not wish to turn my stomach this early in my day.
BKE shareholders really got shafted as it was a case of robbing Peter to pay Paul as simple as that.
I really dont find Mr Worthington, or certain of his associates to be men of intergrity.
This debate has lumbered on into territory it would be best out of.
I feel that you really should have let the SP to the talking as I suggested we do earlier , as perhaps now were are both embroiled in matters that although are probably best left unspoken, are long over due for an airing in an open forum.
I see this aspect of the debate going on and into further investigation and will only serve to weaken the COH share price from here on in!
bmw325 - 22 May 2007 17:50 - 794 of 2037
100,000 buy at the close
| About MoneyAM | Ts and Cs | Privacy Policy | Investment Warning | Content Standards | Corporate Solutions | Advertise With Us | Site Map | © 2025 MoneyAM |
Register now for FREE
Share Prices,
Stock Quotes,
Charts, Bulletin Boards, Indices, Watchlists, Portfolio, Market News, Research
or see our Premium Services including Level 2, Terminal and much more.
Follow us on Twitter