bosley
- 20 Feb 2004 09:34
driver
- 24 Jul 2005 10:36
- 7781 of 27111
eric
I hope your not suggesting that ii comes over to NOWT thread, on second thoughts we can rip him to pieces on there and I will enjoy doing it, with others.
ii click here
aldwickk
- 24 Jul 2005 10:45
- 7782 of 27111
Maybe II is more then one person [ II is the group name of a number of de rampers being paid to keep the SEO price down ].
bosley
- 24 Jul 2005 14:30
- 7783 of 27111
personally , i ignore what ii has to say . anybody who listened to him and either sold or didnt buy seo would have missed out on the subsequent rise. anybody who didnt listen and held or bought has so far not lost a penny , as the sp is virtually the same as when he started posting. firstly, i and others on this thread , recommend all rumours to be treated as bullshit. base your research and opinions on news, facts not rumours, be they good or bad. secondly
"RNS 19th July no mention of the 3rd trial just mention of other trials of Greenseal AND Starpol 2000 together so why no mention of the 3rd trial in the latest RNS has it all gone wrong ??
Ian Balchin CEO Stanelco plc commented, 'We are delighted to be working with G Mondini and expect the first purpose built new machine to be supplied to an ASDA supplier that has recently completed successful trials of GREENSEAL(TM) technology using retrofitted equipment. Other trials of GREENSEAL(TM)technology and our biocompostible food tray material provisionally named Starpol2000(TM) are all progressing extremely well . We are also making excellent headway with our patent protection program in a field where there is little pre-existing patented technology.' "
all i can say is that i have been told by seo that all is well with the third trial and that there has been a fourth. my guess is the fourth trial is what balchin is talking about when he mentions other trials. patience , patience , patience.
thirdly, i think ii says it best....
"Please learn to read through spin as I keep telling you "
couldn't have put it better myself.
paulmasterson1
- 24 Jul 2005 14:51
- 7785 of 27111
iidiot posts at 4am, because he is a USA in the USA (useless shorting amatuer)
Still got that short at 15p I reckon, and still losing money all the time, otherwise he wouldn't be still be bashing SEO 24/7/365, he's been doing it for over 2 years on adv-fn, as mrjingles then thebigw, he's a loony, posts nothing on any other share, used to post on bprg until they dropped like the bag of kak that they are, he might even work for them ....
Anyone who posts that much content, of lies, misinformation, and twisting of facts and public statements, just to try and ruin the Stanelco growth story, has obviously got a massive problem with reality, and no life ... iidiot should go top himself and do us all a favour ....
insiderinside
- 24 Jul 2005 15:06
- 7786 of 27111
paul - can you learn to leave the personal abuse out of things ? Just ignore people - like I ignore you totally until you just keep having a dig too much and laying out the abuse ! I thought Ian told people to stop getting personal ???
paulmasterson1 24 Jul 2005 14:51 - 7785 of 7785
iidiot posts at 4am, because he is a USA in the USA (useless shorting amatuer)
Still got that short at 15p I reckon, and still losing money all the time, otherwise he wouldn't be still be bashing SEO 24/7/365, he's been doing it for over 2 years on adv-fn, as mrjingles then thebigw, he's a loony, posts nothing on any other share, used to post on bprg until they dropped like the bag of kak that they are, he might even work for them ....
Anyone who posts that much content, of lies, misinformation, and twisting of facts and public statements, just to try and ruin the Stanelco growth story, has obviously got a massive problem with reality, and no life ... iidiot should go top himself and do us all a favour ....
bosley
- 24 Jul 2005 15:54
- 7787 of 27111
paul and ii, please set up your own thread as you are boring the shit out of me.
paulmasterson1
- 24 Jul 2005 16:29
- 7788 of 27111
Bos been on the beer ?
First time I have mentioned the iidiot for ages, I don't see how that warrants a respose like that ....
superrod
- 24 Jul 2005 20:50
- 7789 of 27111
from ii
"One hears rumours that Walmart is now ruled out for at least a couple of years if ever "
"Rumour goes that a series of small little RNSs will come along - but none with the power to push things up long term - all being due to now a realisation that Walmart will not go ahead and any progress into the USA market will be very much more difficult than SE0 had thought it would be"
"and now a panic is on to get into deals with other suppliers as the long term plan is now messed totally - this rumour also explains the very slow uptake by Asda suppliers "
TALK ABOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS................
if an SEO bull had posted "rumours" of imminent take up by Walmart, "rumours"of massive product sales, "rumours" of forthcoming RNSs heralding good news ii would be threatening the poster with legal action.
ALSO, my main beef with ii is his "trend" posts. i notice the last graph he posted showing a downtrend spanned only a few days.
maybe one of you techies could redress the balance with similar graphs during up periods.
stockdog
- 24 Jul 2005 20:55
- 7790 of 27111
superrod - I don't think your rational approach will be half as effective as a light tap on the Squelch button!
sd
paulmasterson1
- 24 Jul 2005 21:18
- 7791 of 27111
II talking drivel again, not a shred of evidence to back up the bull' .... BUT I HAVE GOT EVIDENCE TO THE CONTRARY !!!!
As far as I can see, Walmart will not be able to get Greenseal quick enough ....
http://www.coloradoan.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050724/BUSINESS/507240332/1046
Wal-Mart green with energy
Discount chain trying out energy-efficient designs
By STEVE QUINN
The Associated Press
Sunday, July 24, 2005
McKINNEY, Texas - Wal-Mart is experimenting with its first environmentally friendly store as it searches for ways to conserve resources and save money.
The world's largest retailer was scheduled to open a 206,000-square-foot building last week that will include features such as a 120-foot-tall wind turbine that will produce about 5 percent of the store's energy and a rainwater harvesting pond designed to provide 95 percent of the water needed for irrigation.
"We want to push this thing to the limit," said Don Moseley, manager of experimental projects for the Bentonville, Ark., company. "We don't expect everything to work, but with every component of our business, we want to be more sustainable, more economical or more environmentally responsible."
A second experimental store is under construction in Aurora, Colo.
Wal-Mart wants some of the features in the store's design to one day be viewed as standard, including waterless urinals in customer bathrooms, saving about one gallon of water per usage; recycled cooking oil from the store's deli and engine oil from the auto center that will be used to help heat the building; and climate control measures and alternative refrigeration units that are projected to save enough electricity to power 135 single-family homes for one year.
The company said there were additional costs with the conservation efforts but would not elaborate on the price tag.
"We want to see if this can save us some money and keep our costs down," said Gus Whitcomb, Wal-Mart's area director of corporate affairs.
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. has been working to polish its image as an employee and community-friendly corporation. In April, the company earmarked $35 million over 10 years to help the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation conserve one acre of priority habitat for each acre developed.
Analyst Al Meyers of Retail Forward Inc. said he'll be watching the store and the company's environmental efforts closely.
"This is a little counterintuitive because they are a bare-bones, lowest operational expense company in the industry," he said.
Moseley said Wal-Mart chose McKinney, a city of 92,000 residents about 30 miles north of Dallas, for the new building because it has a traditional store nearby to gauge its progress.
=================================================
Also they are still top of the Fortune 500, and will want to stay there, and Greenseal can help them do that, by reducing costs, and the bonus of being able to say they are using environmentally friendly packaging ....
Walmart tops Fortune Global 500
Tuesday July 12, 2005 14:56 - (SA)
American retail giant Walmart has topped the Fortune Global 500 list of the world's richest companies.
This is the fourth year in a row that the retailer has held the top position on the list compiled by the business magazine.
In a statement, Fortune said revenues for Global 500 companies increased by 13% and profits were up 27% for 2004.
"It got a lot harder to join the ranks of the world's largest corporations this year," Fortune writer Janet Guyon writes in her introduction to the list.
The companies who make up the top ten on the list are:
No. 2 BP (Britain)
No. 3 Exxon Mobil (US)
No. 4 Royal Dutch/Shell Group (Britain/Netherlands)
No. 5 General Motors (US)
No. 6 DaimlerChrysler (Germany)
No. 7 Toyota Motor (Japan)
No. 8 Ford Motor (US)
No. 9 General Electric (US.)
No. 10 Total (France)
Oil companies and European and Asian car manufacturers performed especially well on the list.
The United States had 176 companies on this year's list, far more than any other country. However, there are 14 fewer US companies on the list this year than last year, mainly due to the weak dollar, the magazine said.
The number of Chinese companies on the list increased to 16 this year, up from 15 last year and just three in 1995. Five Indian companies are on the list, up from four last year and one the year before.
The list and accompanying stories appear in the July 25 issue of Fortune.
http://www.sundaytimes.co.za/zones/sundaytimesNEW/business/business1121173015.aspx
Cheers,
PM
paulmasterson1
- 24 Jul 2005 21:21
- 7792 of 27111
And Starpol also falls into Wal-Mart's category for this statement "with every component of our business, we want to be more sustainable, more economical or more environmentally responsible."
Cheers,
PM
bhunt1910
- 24 Jul 2005 21:37
- 7793 of 27111
Paul - Sorry - but whilst I would want to beleive you, your postings are pure speculation at this stage. - There is not an ounce of evidence to suggest that WM is looking at any of the SEO products. It may well be that they are and we know that SEO have done presentations to WM - but there has been no news about anything else - so far.
andysmith
- 24 Jul 2005 22:29
- 7795 of 27111
Shouldn't be long to wait now folks, yes the trials appear to have taken a long time, food packaging trials do, especially in this case where there is new technology to packaging and will probably involve several weeks trials to obtain sufficient data, shipment into stores, completion of shelf-life tests, product testing, microbiological testing, rejection rates, market analysis etc, etc.
This thorough work up front will be of benefit on a roll-out and I would expect there is a countdown by many non-Asda UK packers to the end of the Asda exclusivity and then there's likely US roll-out as well.
IMO ii is wrong saying that sale of 50% Biotec was a panic, SEO ensured that they secured the purchase of what they needed, funded by 9m at 21.15p from Institutions. This ensured that SEO got what they needed and can you imagine SEO getting that funding without a good case.
If you've invested, can you hold your nerve in the face of the shorters and panic sellers, although nothing wrong with locking in profits, done it myself on MMG ealier this year, its just with SEO, we know the next RNS's could be the ones we have waited for and then we're off and running big-time. lets hope so anyway.
Thank God some sense of normality has returned to this thread, please keep it that way with sensible posts for and against and not pages of crap slanging matches.
bhunt1910
- 25 Jul 2005 00:47
- 7796 of 27111
Got that feeling in me water again - suspect we will get an RNS this week - my bet is that it will be on Tuesday - SEO seem to like Tuesdays.
Night night
Baza
insiderinside
- 25 Jul 2005 01:39
- 7797 of 27111
andysmith - given a distinct lack of any holdings RNSs - I still retain my view at the time of the placing - it said only Institutions supported the placing - not purchased any shares for long term holding - and it still remains IMO they took them and sold them - that was their support - they knew it would be easy to sell them off to small PIs- now the overhang is clear - the truth is starting to come out - the delays and problems IMO - everyone who got "spun" into believing the Institutions brought in to hold is wearing RT specs.
bhunt1910
- 25 Jul 2005 07:39
- 7798 of 27111
Morning All - Yuk -
Baza
bosley
- 25 Jul 2005 07:57
- 7799 of 27111
morning all. here we go again!!!!
paulmasterson1
- 25 Jul 2005 08:24
- 7800 of 27111
Hi All,
Bought myself another 5078 @19.4p
Cheers,
PM