If you haven't yet seen Jacob Rees-Mogg in action, here he typically thrashes Mark Carney's answer with his question,""In general elections you do not give a view on parties' economic policies. Why not?"
Carney's answer to explain why a referendum is different from a general election fails to convince Rees-Mogg,
and indeed, fails to convince any open-minded observer.
Rees-Mogg asked: "Don't you have a responsibility to be apolitical?"
Carney replied: "We are apolitical, which may be inconvenient for you, but to suggest otherwise is to try to undermine that."
Rees-Mogg: "I do suggest otherwise –"
Carney: "Then you try to undermine that."
Rees-Mogg asked if the Bank would give its opinion on Jeremy Corbyn's "new economics" speech, which proposed radical changes. "I don't think that's worth a reply," said Carney.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/jacob-rees-mogg-just-gave-mark-carney-the-politest-of-beatings-a7044701.html
Rachel Reeves, the Labour MP and former employee of the Bank, added: "If anyone's reputation has been damaged today I don't think it is the Bank of England's."
The writer of the article, says, "I disagree. It would have been straightforward for the Bank to have said that the referendum was a political decision and that it would not comment on it at all.
Rees-Mogg's questioning was a model of cross-examination."
IMHO, Jacob's Rees-Mogg's opinions, clarity of thought and use of the spoken word in expressing those opinions, enamours anyone to him who cares to listen to what he has to say.
It is then so easy to see 'the essence' of this man and it matters not, eg., as to whether he has ever changed a bay's nappy or not. :-)