The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

Pray tell me.why does every person on the planet and others besides have to answer your questionsthen when someone dares to challenge you.you become that deaf dumb blind kid.do you play pinball?...

Longjohn = Tabasco?

Yeah crossed my mind too pt , longjohn is fully aware of all posts on here , never answers a question and blindly supports anything BM does.

He fits the bill.

Dil-boyI have been more people than Rory Bremner and Alistair McGowan put together
I suppose I live on Treasure Island and also post under Robert Louis Stevenson Ernest Hemingwayand Rudyard Kipling.I do a bit of baking on the side in my spare timeand make exceedingly good cakes
Was that the Gay Boy Pottys idea?hes exceedingly stupid as well!!!.

Not as stupid as those who invested in this shit company? It's amazing anyone thought a sln would raise 6m let alone 12m. It's taken a long time for the muppets in the zoo to realise that the as of the shareholders and the BoD are not necessarily the same.

Cay>

Will you take a score six to fourthree post or moreScots law
Did you know the current Poet Laureate is Kay as well Caymust stop talking to myself.Ok!

The man has told me from his heart he will not shaft myself or any other shareholderand that has always been good enough for mehe is an astute businessmanand a winnerbut mores to the pointimo a decant human beingwithout him my investment would be gone finisheddead dot com!!!if Barry gets some or all of my investment backit will be down to him and Garry alonewhat investor with even half a brain could have another theorythose with other theories are non-investorsor complete London LBCs
-------------------------

B J Muncaster - 18 Aug'09 - 11:36 - 16249 of 16262

Geordie,

It's be explained a million times already. But once more, just for you:

It is the total sum of cash (real cash money, not an aborted contract, not expenses, not my imagination, just real hard currency)) loaned to the Company and its subsidiaries. RT was made aware of it years ago. I didn't forget it as some would seem to suggest.

All chequebooks, bank statements, wire transfers, fax transfer requests, and a detailed spreadsheet are available for inspection by anyone prepared to get off their backside and take a look.

And for all the naysayers, and others who bitch about me, I recently released the Company from a contingent liability of around 2M relating to the old lease on Hostmoor. I hadn't bothered mentioning it before because I just did what was the right thing to do and I'm such a nice guy! But as the attention now seems to be entirely focussed on what Gary and I may make out of this mess, rather than on the fact that without our efforts and Gary's personal cash support of the Company then everyone's cash would be gone forever, I think it's time I told a few home truths.

Aye you keep milking it for every penny you can get Barry.

Non-investorsor complete London LBCs

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=14368#lastread

"The man has told me from his heart he will not shaft myself or any other shareholderand that has always been good enough for mehe is an astute businessmanand a winnerbut mores to the pointimo a decant human beingwithout him my investment would be gone finisheddead dot com!!!if Barry gets some or all of my investment backit will be down to him and Garry alonewhat investor with even half a brain could have another theorythose with other theories are non-investorsor complete London LBCs"



Ever the naive dimwit, eh Tabatha? ROFLMAO!



Do these guys need to borrow my calculator? ;-))

BTW Tabatha, dayrating (or consulting) is for those of us who wish to pick and choose our work. ;-))))

Work to live .......... not the other way round. Every time you open your mouth, you look dumber and dumber. You're a classic!

Now kiss me darling. LOL!!!!!!!!!

Big Al- 18 Aug 2009 19:21 - 7918 of 7918

BTW Tabatha, dayrating (or insulting) is for those of us who wish to pick and choose our work. ;-))))

Loosely translated that means for those that need to workbut cant get full employmentdayrate is the pits and you are only fooling yourselfall my play is done on a negotiated price.anyway.insulting.who the fu*k would listen to you?.I now a lot of people that would pay good money to insult you.

"dayrate is the pits and you are only fooling yourself"

I always figured you lived in cloud cuckoo land and now you've proved it.

If you've no need of tying yourself to a company, you pick and choose. It's a luxury many can't aspire to; you're obviously one of them.

Suppose when this goes round the U-bend you'll be looking for 4-5 years' "employment" to get your savings topped back up. ROFLMAO! Idiot.



You're still listening. ;-))))))))))

How do you blow up a bouncy castle?.what is your dayrate?.how long does it take you to consult with your bouncy castle people?do you use helium?is that why you talk so funny?when you pick and choose your bouncy castlesdo you pick by colour?is pink your favourite colour?do you have to take your shoes off to bounce?have you got holes in your socks?could Dil aspire to your luxury life?sorry for al the questions.such is my admirationmust dashbit of consulting with the wife toddle pip

"all my play is done on a negotiated price"


Must have made a fortune tabby going on the advice you give on here. .

Good morning alldog been walkedbaguette and coffee smelling sensational.shorts and tee-shirt day here in Kent 30 degrees

Dilcomfortable is the word I would have used.I will leave the fortunes for yourself and the incredible bouncy.

Good morning tabasco / l0ngjohn!

Why do you use different names on different BB's?

I prefer to use the same one for consistency, and transparency.

Good morning to you Andyin answer to your questionI believe I can get the best/most out of people being discretemy motives are always honestmy views are sincere... in that moment of timeplus I lead a very private life.
Let me ask you a question Andyif I may.
Most of the gang use their own nameI presumeor though if I was called Dil I would certainly change ithow about Dirk? do you believe them to be honest and sincere with the views they post on these bbs?.do you you think their motives are as honest as mine?
One further thoughtyou strike me as the kind of guy that stands up for fare playmany of your posts have advised those that have been treated in an unjust and unfair manner..rightfully so.
Do you think it corpus delicti to accuse Tabasco of being a fictional character from Treasure Islandnot your styleI would have thought

More and more seeing the light tabby , this guy has always been one of BM's biggest fans !


mad mike - 19 Aug'09 - 10:27 - 16424 of 16454


Barry, I spent a lot of time overnight with private emails to you, to help you understand why your statements of yesterday were wrong (including correcting your own spreadsheet).

So I find your post above (#16404) really surprising (& that is puting it very mildly). It is a completely spurious argument to say you can't compare the original & current option package proposals.

For goodness sake, your whole justification of trying (incorrectly) to argue that the current option package should give option holders 9,26% ownership of the company, was done specifically by reference to the original option proposals (try reading your own document).

You know how this comes across. After:-
1) arguing my figures were wrong (incorrectly),
2) then arguing yesterday (again incorrectly) that even your current option proposal don't work because they never vest above fund raising of 6M,
3) you now try to change the goalposts again and say you can't compare the old & new options proposals (which is again obviously incorrect)

I think you must now fully understand that my original claim was correct, that you and Gary are making 75% to 80% MORE personal net profit with your current option proposals compared to the original proposals.

That just isn't on, on any gounds or reasonableness or fairness.

It is also a huge kick in the teeth to shareholder you have been heavy diluted by dropping the SCLN conversion price as low as 2p.

When you attempt to justify the indefensible you just dig a bigger and bigger hole for you and Gary. The longer you go on before accepting you have to change the option ownership of the company, from 9.26%, to a maximum of 5% to be comparable with the orginal option package, or more likely to 4% for option holders to share a little of shareholders pain (after the drop to 2p). The longer you go on, the more likely shareholders will start to distrust you. I don't want that to happen.

Please, please accept you have to revise the option package, and do so ASAP.

If you don't I have no option but to continue to encourage everyone to vote down the remuneration resolution. Don't forget, if you still force it through, you will have lost the trust of a substantial section of your shareholders, because you are forcing throuh the indefensible.

[edit: I regret that I had to make this post, and to do so publically, but I wasn't left with any other option, after your public post above trying to dismiss any comparison between the two option packages]