The engines have fired up at last for MDX. ( BPRG ) At long last they are being recognised for the force they will become over the next two years. On the cusp of disclosing huge revenue-earning deals with Global pharmacists. These have been hinted at as being unrolled before the years end, but may be in the next days.You still have time to get in at a bargain-basement price before the SP takes off for real shortly.

The man has told me from his heart he will not shaft myself or any other shareholderand that has always been good enough for mehe is an astute businessmanand a winnerbut mores to the pointimo a decant human beingwithout him my investment would be gone finisheddead dot com!!!if Barry gets some or all of my investment backit will be down to him and Garry alonewhat investor with even half a brain could have another theorythose with other theories are non-investorsor complete London LBCs
-------------------------

B J Muncaster - 18 Aug'09 - 11:36 - 16249 of 16262

Geordie,

It's be explained a million times already. But once more, just for you:

It is the total sum of cash (real cash money, not an aborted contract, not expenses, not my imagination, just real hard currency)) loaned to the Company and its subsidiaries. RT was made aware of it years ago. I didn't forget it as some would seem to suggest.

All chequebooks, bank statements, wire transfers, fax transfer requests, and a detailed spreadsheet are available for inspection by anyone prepared to get off their backside and take a look.

And for all the naysayers, and others who bitch about me, I recently released the Company from a contingent liability of around 2M relating to the old lease on Hostmoor. I hadn't bothered mentioning it before because I just did what was the right thing to do and I'm such a nice guy! But as the attention now seems to be entirely focussed on what Gary and I may make out of this mess, rather than on the fact that without our efforts and Gary's personal cash support of the Company then everyone's cash would be gone forever, I think it's time I told a few home truths.

Aye you keep milking it for every penny you can get Barry.

Non-investorsor complete London LBCs

http://www.moneyam.com/InvestorsRoom/posts.php?tid=14368#lastread

"The man has told me from his heart he will not shaft myself or any other shareholderand that has always been good enough for mehe is an astute businessmanand a winnerbut mores to the pointimo a decant human beingwithout him my investment would be gone finisheddead dot com!!!if Barry gets some or all of my investment backit will be down to him and Garry alonewhat investor with even half a brain could have another theorythose with other theories are non-investorsor complete London LBCs"



Ever the naive dimwit, eh Tabatha? ROFLMAO!



Do these guys need to borrow my calculator? ;-))

BTW Tabatha, dayrating (or consulting) is for those of us who wish to pick and choose our work. ;-))))

Work to live .......... not the other way round. Every time you open your mouth, you look dumber and dumber. You're a classic!

Now kiss me darling. LOL!!!!!!!!!

Big Al- 18 Aug 2009 19:21 - 7918 of 7918

BTW Tabatha, dayrating (or insulting) is for those of us who wish to pick and choose our work. ;-))))

Loosely translated that means for those that need to workbut cant get full employmentdayrate is the pits and you are only fooling yourselfall my play is done on a negotiated price.anyway.insulting.who the fu*k would listen to you?.I now a lot of people that would pay good money to insult you.

"dayrate is the pits and you are only fooling yourself"

I always figured you lived in cloud cuckoo land and now you've proved it.

If you've no need of tying yourself to a company, you pick and choose. It's a luxury many can't aspire to; you're obviously one of them.

Suppose when this goes round the U-bend you'll be looking for 4-5 years' "employment" to get your savings topped back up. ROFLMAO! Idiot.



You're still listening. ;-))))))))))

How do you blow up a bouncy castle?.what is your dayrate?.how long does it take you to consult with your bouncy castle people?do you use helium?is that why you talk so funny?when you pick and choose your bouncy castlesdo you pick by colour?is pink your favourite colour?do you have to take your shoes off to bounce?have you got holes in your socks?could Dil aspire to your luxury life?sorry for al the questions.such is my admirationmust dashbit of consulting with the wife toddle pip

"all my play is done on a negotiated price"


Must have made a fortune tabby going on the advice you give on here. .

Good morning alldog been walkedbaguette and coffee smelling sensational.shorts and tee-shirt day here in Kent 30 degrees

Dilcomfortable is the word I would have used.I will leave the fortunes for yourself and the incredible bouncy.

Good morning tabasco / l0ngjohn!

Why do you use different names on different BB's?

I prefer to use the same one for consistency, and transparency.

Good morning to you Andyin answer to your questionI believe I can get the best/most out of people being discretemy motives are always honestmy views are sincere... in that moment of timeplus I lead a very private life.
Let me ask you a question Andyif I may.
Most of the gang use their own nameI presumeor though if I was called Dil I would certainly change ithow about Dirk? do you believe them to be honest and sincere with the views they post on these bbs?.do you you think their motives are as honest as mine?
One further thoughtyou strike me as the kind of guy that stands up for fare playmany of your posts have advised those that have been treated in an unjust and unfair manner..rightfully so.
Do you think it corpus delicti to accuse Tabasco of being a fictional character from Treasure Islandnot your styleI would have thought

More and more seeing the light tabby , this guy has always been one of BM's biggest fans !


mad mike - 19 Aug'09 - 10:27 - 16424 of 16454


Barry, I spent a lot of time overnight with private emails to you, to help you understand why your statements of yesterday were wrong (including correcting your own spreadsheet).

So I find your post above (#16404) really surprising (& that is puting it very mildly). It is a completely spurious argument to say you can't compare the original & current option package proposals.

For goodness sake, your whole justification of trying (incorrectly) to argue that the current option package should give option holders 9,26% ownership of the company, was done specifically by reference to the original option proposals (try reading your own document).

You know how this comes across. After:-
1) arguing my figures were wrong (incorrectly),
2) then arguing yesterday (again incorrectly) that even your current option proposal don't work because they never vest above fund raising of 6M,
3) you now try to change the goalposts again and say you can't compare the old & new options proposals (which is again obviously incorrect)

I think you must now fully understand that my original claim was correct, that you and Gary are making 75% to 80% MORE personal net profit with your current option proposals compared to the original proposals.

That just isn't on, on any gounds or reasonableness or fairness.

It is also a huge kick in the teeth to shareholder you have been heavy diluted by dropping the SCLN conversion price as low as 2p.

When you attempt to justify the indefensible you just dig a bigger and bigger hole for you and Gary. The longer you go on before accepting you have to change the option ownership of the company, from 9.26%, to a maximum of 5% to be comparable with the orginal option package, or more likely to 4% for option holders to share a little of shareholders pain (after the drop to 2p). The longer you go on, the more likely shareholders will start to distrust you. I don't want that to happen.

Please, please accept you have to revise the option package, and do so ASAP.

If you don't I have no option but to continue to encourage everyone to vote down the remuneration resolution. Don't forget, if you still force it through, you will have lost the trust of a substantial section of your shareholders, because you are forcing throuh the indefensible.

[edit: I regret that I had to make this post, and to do so publically, but I wasn't left with any other option, after your public post above trying to dismiss any comparison between the two option packages]

Do you think it not a good idea to post Barrys reply?
----------------------------------------------

B J Muncaster - 19 Aug'09 - 10:54 - 16432 of 16456

Mad Mike,

I just emailed you before your post. Read it and then respond.

My point about your numbers not being an accurate reflection is well explained. I don't think you've made it clear to readers that we are (a) incentivised to minimise dilution, and that (b) we have to achieve a significantly higher EBITA (not just 6M if the offer is well subscribed). Why not tell everyone what we have to achieve by way of EBITA for the options to vest if the SLN offer raised 8, 10, or 12M?

And I'm not wrong about the options never vesting at 6m EBITA if the offer is well subscribed as you have admitted in your email to me. As I said, it needs to be much higher for them to vest.

I think it would also be appropriate for you to mention the vastly increased profit SLN participants will make if we achieve the Company's goal of 6M EBITA, and that they could do so without our options ever vesting.

Of course we related the % potential ownership to the earlier document because close on 10% to achieve what we're setting out to do is reasonable. That's a fixed number in our opinion. All other numbers from the earlier offer are variable and now irrelevant because it didn't happen.

If, as you suggest, we lose the trust of some shareholders after all we've done to keep the Company afloat, and I've explained some of this to you in my email, the so be it. If people want to be that shortsighted and ungrateful then they can vote to remove us from the BOD.

Frankly, I am getting closer to the point where I'm really getting cheesed off with the attitude of some on here. We've had but a handful of people take up our offer to visit with us and see what's going on, yet people sit behind their keyboards and criticise all that we do. I wouldn't want to go to war with any of them. Few have any idea of the time, effort, cash and risk we've put in to keep the Company going. Of course we expect to benefit from all of this. But we could have gone to a VC who would have diluted the crap out of everyone and not given anyone the chance to join in, and we could have cut a deal for ourseleves in the process. Or we could have let it slide into admin. We did neither. We have given every qualified shareholder the opportunity to participate in the SLN offer.

You can post my email to you if you wish.

BM is to be congratulated in taking the time to explain, from his otherwise sterling work on rebuilding plans for the company.
However, with his inside knowledge, expertise etc/ it seems a pity this company was allowed to become so detatched frrom reality that it came to this (implied) cliffhanger, we see now.
I guess he deserves to succeede, so those brave enough to pile in will be rewarded in time.

This must go down as one of the most fantastic quotes I've ever read on here........

"Good morning to you Andyin answer to your questionI believe I can get the best/most out of people being discretemy motives are always honestmy views are sincere... in that moment of timeplus I lead a very private life."


Every one of the above is complete garbage, Tabatha, particularly the "honest" bit. You have freely admitted you arrived here with the sole intention of helping Scottie boy by "supposedly" planting a post - remember that first one about sinking your whole pot on this pile of crap? And to psot on here incessantly about your "great life", etc, etc hardly smacks of someone wishing to lead a private life.

You are dishonest, dishonourable, disingenuous and probably the most imbecilic individual to ever arrive here. You can't spell even the simplest words and your grammar is absolutely atrocious - please use the above quote as an example. I assume O level English was not something you passed. A typical bookie really and, most likely, a vindictive sad old git who's lost a small fortune on MDX and can't let go.


Never mind, I love you! You make me howl with laughter every day.
;-)))

PS - a bookshop might help to decipher the above post, Tabatha. Look in the dictionary section.

ROFLMAO!

And do you not think you should post mike's reply to Barry's b*llox tabby.


Everyone can now see they are being shafted by BM , nothing new there then.

Good morning all>

BouncyI see you milked your day ratenine oclock?did you decide on a red bouncy castle or a yellow onetwelve hours at?does the agency pay you much more than minimum ratecould be as much as a ton?
The little Scotsman with the orange freckles has got very personalso let me answer your post thoroughly bouncy.first>

Every one of the above is complete garbage, Tabatha, particularly the "honest" bit. You have freely admitted you arrived here with the sole intention of helping Scottie boy by "supposedly" planting a post

AnsweryesI have made no secret of that factScotty was being bulliedhe had strong beliefsmany correct...and proven so in the UK's currant disastrous positionand I stated many times I exterminate bulliesI/we have planted many postfactit does get a responsive story contentand in double quick time.you showed your position before the ink had dried so I am honestnow that wasnt difficult was it?or do you need to consultday rate of course!


remember that first one about sinking your whole pot on this pile of crap? And to psot on here incessantly about your "great life"

Answeryes.I had a number of investments at that time as was statedand I still dobut I did sink a good proportion of my then available cash pot into mdxI also believe I gave you a total of my investment pot as well as stating mdx owes me very littleand yes I do lead a great lifeand appreciate every minute of itso I am honest again.I fear you do not live such an idyllic lifeyou struggle to convince in your ability as a wordsmith!!!

hardly smacks of someone wishing to lead a private life

Answerdo you know where I live?do you know my name?do you know anything about my children?do you know anything about the rest of my familyother that I told someone on here that I lost my dear and loving Mother to C do you know any other nom de plume I use not even the BBs or most other information sites.. hold my personal information my good friend helps me out so yes I make sure I live a very private life...so I am honest again...

probably the most imbecilic individual to ever arrive here. You can't spell even the simplest words and your grammar is absolutely atrocious

Answerwhen have I ever classed myself as anything other than a thicko.albeit a very lucky thickoyou see I can admit my faultsyou struggle a wee bitI also do several jobs/play at the same time and flash through postsI make plenty of mistakesand talk street talkyer sowat.so I am honest again... I could psot on here incessantlybut I dont get time to decipher!!!

Bouncy.lay off the Heliumyou are one silly cnut

Just to finish off as I do have other play>

longj0hn - 19 Aug'09 - 14:23 - 16458 of 16645

Andy
FYI I never post on MAM and I only occasionally read it, whats the point, there are only a couple of Meldex holders who post there who are continually ridiculed from posters who, like you who don't hold, Its enlightening to read the sniping that goes on over there though

Johnthey ridicule only themselvesand make a very good job of itkeep up the good workand dont tell Dilwho holds one share your previous user name.