" alt="" /> " alt="" />

Cheers Gaz, Great links and posts.
The last one is pretty remarkable......

Snurkle - cheers - will read and pop an update on, as to any insights from the same guy in the next day or two.

Time to spend a week readying the garden for winter, together with house exterior repairs and servicing the cars etc.
Then a "good reason" for a couple of weeks pre winter step off the world break in the sunshine (No TV , No Computers, No Newspapers or Radio, and switched off mobile...heaven).

Will give you a wave :o)

Talking of waves .......IF - there is a Napolitano - Grid goes down

Bear this in mind ....this is what TPTB admit to




Imagine what they have ...actually got....floating around on satellites

The following is
- from the same "source" as my last but one post
- & whilst un-named - as can be seen above ......he nailed current events to - the letter
- last...OCTOBER (2012)
- when all mainstream and talking heads - were all discussing the hardware parked off/and around...Iran ......& Iran....going hot



He concludes his end of Aug 2013 warning with
- people are just not thinking - BIG ENOUGH


So I will preface the salient clips from his Aug 2013 update with this extract from a
- J Edgar F^B^I HOOVER Speech

- perhaps he was in a position - to both understand - Joe Public
- and what...and just - how big - and how muti-generational
- what goes on - behind the veil......actually is

....................................................................................................................

The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with..... a conspiracy so monstrous....... he cannot believe .....it exists.

The American mind
- simply has not come.... to a realization
- of the evil which has been introduced into our midst.
- It rejects even the assumption that human creatures
- could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.

......................................................................................................................

Clips of end Aug 2013 update

“We’re in the most dangerous time in modern world history and here’s why,
- here’s what’s happening,”

“We’re seeing a combination of a nine-percent overall approval rating for intervention in Syria,
- or the.... absence of public support ........for the globalist plans
-. When have we seen this before,
- and what does history tell us?
The increased likelihood of a false flag event larger and causing more public outrage than the alleged chemical weapons attacks.”

“think Gulf of Tonkin, the Lusitania, even Pearl Harbor,
- use those as your......... historical guides
- for what we’re seeing today.

Make no mistake, the global agenda has not changed,

”He emphasized.
“When their primary plan ...backfires or meets resistance,
- they have alternate plans.

In the coming days or weeks, we could see an event that will be.....
- horrendous enough to change that nine-percent backing.
- Also, time is not on their side,
( they need to act within a short window as the anti-Assad ‘rebels’ are being beaten badly...... without Western assistance.)

“Look at all of the military assets being moved into that region. I told you last October, and you reported it,
- that we are engaged in a proxy war against Russia and China.
- Both countries have a huge stake in Syria, militarily and economically, especially Russia.
- As I said before, any action will not be in a vacuum or without a tit-for-tat response,”

“Launching cruise missiles into Syria will likely fall
- not only upon innocent civilians,
- but on Iranian forces,
- Russian forces - Russia has over 100,000 ‘military advisors there..... now,
- and perhaps even some Chinese assets.

What do you think their response will be?” he asked rhetorically.
- “This is asymmetrical warfare on steroids.

The response might not be what everyone expects. In fact, we should be looking for the unexpected, as we are about to be blindsided.”

“Do you think that telegraphing our target list and stating that strikes will be brief and limited by the incompetence of the regime,
- or by design?
- It’s by design,”
( this will provide the opportunity to the Russians and other essential assets to get out of the way)

“And therein lies the ‘flash-bang, pyrotechnic display of the magic show ......I’ve been talking about,
- that is intended to divert everyone’s attention

- from what’s really about to happen,”

“This is not a ‘zero sum game’ confined to Syria.

Again,
- this is about setting up .....the globalist takeover of the world’s economic system,
- killing off the U.S. dollar
- to have it replaced by a basket of currencies, or SDRs,
- and controlling all transactional activity .......everywhere on the planet
- under one mechanism.

It will be done
- by using Syria as the trigger,
- oil as a weapon,
- and striking at the weakest aspect of American power
— the U.S. dollar,
which has been the target all along.”

“What better way to accomplish this
- by blaming..... the economic ‘collapse’
- on the ‘unfortunate and... unseen’ consequences
- of a ‘humanitarian mission’,
- saving the Syrians from a dictator who used chemical weapons on his own people?

It’s all a lie, and we’re being played as fools.
- This is an international bankers’ war
- that will result in heavy causalities.”

Removal of Assad
- will result in the wholesale slaughter of the diverse religious sects.
- Responsible estimates from those familiar with the geopolitics of Syria estimate
- that 20% of a population of twenty-million will be killed
- that's a total of..... 4 million people.

Watch for a false flag

“The globalists are financing all sides of this conflict
- to assure the accomplishments of .....their objectives.

When things go hot in Syria and the Middle East,
- we could see something very bad happen
- in Saudi Arabia,
- or something to affect the production or free flow of oil,
- the single factor that is keeping the U.S. dollar relevant.
- We could see something happen to threaten, hinder
- or even temporarily halt........ oil shipments across the globe.

Also, with the U.S. preoccupied, China could well move on the Japanese Senkaku islands, North Korea will ramp up their mischief,
- and other areas will gradually become unglued.

It’s all one big transfer of power, transfer of wealth, and a global economic reset.”

“Understand this: the globalist objectives have not changed.
- The absence of popular support just makes this whole situation much more dangerous,
- and raises the possibility of ‘false flag events’
- of similar historical precedent .......to change public opinion.

Something much bigger than we’ve seen to date.

People...... are just not thinking..... big enough.”

.......................................................................................................................

Perhaps this quote is pertinent - again from a man - who knows full well
- what goes on .........behind the veil

Henry Kissinger speaking at the annual Bilderberger meeting, May 21, 1992

"People of privilege will always risk....... their complete destruction
- rather than surrender .....any material part ....of their advantage."

And 4 mins of advice on that aspect...which applies to - me....and you !!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5dBZDSSky0

....................................................................................................................

NB - if you have doubts - that the elite - have rolling muti-generational plans
- to achieve control of.....a one world government
- look up late film director - Aaron Rousso's
- first hand account - of his conversations with TPTB David Rockerchappie himself.
- it's on youT with that man - Jones

....................................................................................................................

Make of it - what you will
FWIW basis

Mark Twain said of the ...two most important days in your life
- The First....is the day you are born
- The Second.....is the day you find out ....why !

....................................................................................................................

Catch Y'all in 3 weeks

Hope Mabel & the silent readers .....keep the board ticking over

Until myself, Snurkle & Sahara get back & into full swing :o)

May the world remain a safe place.

Gaz, thanks for all your input.
On my jollies now, getting ready for what's ahead.
Have a great time away yourself.

Waves were awesome today.

Silver having a breather. Can see it being propelled further north in the not too distant future.

Fingers crossed I'm right

Breaking News

In a stunning development,..... two JP Morgan whistleblowers
- have confessed that...... the bank manipulates the gold and silver markets.

This is truly a shocking admission by the courageous JP Morgan whistleblowers.
- London metals trader Andrew Maguire days that the two JP Morgan employees came directly to him with... hard evidence
- that the bank was actively manipulating the gold and silver markets.

This is a truly catastrophic event for JP Morgan, which up to now has denied manipulating these markets.
- Maguire led the two JP Morgan employees to turn over the evidence to a law firm which specializes in high profile whistleblowers,
- and also to the CFTC.

According to Maguire, the CFTC has virtually buried this information.

Is this a cover up, or the next LIBOR scandal about to be exposed.


Since the original CFTC Silver Manipulation Investigation Meeting,
- I’ve provided a very large amount of..... detailed evidence to the agency.

And what.... isn’t known, however,..... up until now,
- is during that time I was also contacted..... by two JP Morgan employees
- who told me they had a large amount of .......documented evidence
- of market trading abuses in gold and silver by their bank (JP Morgan).

Now, it was my understanding that this covered the same time period of metals abuses that I had prepared in my submissions. And for their own protection...
- I directed them to a law firm specializing in whistle blowers
- so they could formally provide this evidence under the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provision directly to the CFTC.

This would provide them the necessary protections which they would need if they were going to make such a submission.

Now, this was..... actually done in early June, 2012.
(Not June, 2013, but June of 2012)
- which is staggering.

Now, I didn’t want to hinder any investigation,
- so I kept this information ‘under wraps,’ until now.
To date, as far as I’m aware, these JP Morgan whistleblowers
- have not ....received any meaningful response to their evidence (from the CFTC),
- nor have we seen any formal charges laid against this bank.

But needless to say, there is a lot of evidence on the table. And ....
- you cannot have a multi-year investigation relating.... to abuses in the metals markets
- without there being.... an obvious .....and evermore embarrassing... problem
- .....for this agency (the CFTC).

We now know the LIBOR scandal flew under the radar.... for 15 to 20 years,
- and it was only when the famous Bollinger email was leaked and published
- that a formal investigation and charges were laid against these banks.
- This (LIBOR) investigation has resulted in some charges and it’s actually still going on today.

The point I am trying to make,
- is it amazes me ......what a little publicity will do to get some action.
- Now, we as traders all knew the bullion banks’ manipulations were going on,
- but they were never reported by the mainstream media.

So obviously many people were skeptical, and once the evidence became mainstream........,
- all hell broke loose.
KWN

...................................................................................................................

The Above - is - more than......"a little publicity"
- so it should....."get - some action"

- will "all hell break loose" ????

Here's one that I found interestin - from Consortiumnews.

mabel


How War on Syria Lost Its Way
September 14, 2013
Exclusive: What looked like another U.S. march to war in the Mideast has turned toward a peaceful accord that carries hope of getting Syria to relinquish its chemical weapons and achieving a cease-fire, maybe even an end to the civil war. But some want to resume the drive toward a U.S. attack, ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern says.


By Ray McGovern

The just announced U.S.-Russia agreement in Geneva on a “joint determination to ensure the destruction of the Syrian chemical weapons (CW) program in the soonest and safest manner” sounds the death knell to an attempt by Israel, Turkey and Saudi Arabia to get the U.S. into the war in Syria.

Equally important, it greatly increases the prospect of further U.S.-Russia cooperation to tamp down escalating violence in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East. That the two sides were able to hammer out in three days a detailed agreement on such highly delicate, complicated issues is little short of a miracle. I cannot remember seeing the likes of it in 50 years in Washington.


resident Barack Obama holds a bilateral meeting with His Highness Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al Sabah, the Amir of Kuwait, in the Oval Office, Sept. 13, 2013. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)
Just two short weeks ago, the prospect of a U.S. military strike against Syria looked like a done deal with Official Washington abuzz with excitement about cruise missiles being launched from American warships in the Mediterranean, flying low toward their targets and lighting up the night sky of Damascus like the “shock and awe” pyrotechnics did to Baghdad in 2003.

On Aug. 30, Secretary of State John Kerry seemed to seal the deal with an impassioned address that declared some 35 times that “we know” Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had crossed President Barack Obama’s “red line” against using chemical weapons with an Aug. 21 attack and needed to be punished.

Along with Kerry’s speech, the White House released a four-page “Government Assessment” declaring with “high confidence” that Assad’s regime was guilty of the attack on a Damascus suburb that killed precisely “1,429” people and “at least 426 children.” Though the white paper included not a single verifiable fact establishing Assad’s guilt – nor did it explain where its casualty figures came from – the assessment was accepted as true by most of the mainstream U.S. news media.

At that moment, Israel and its many backers had every reason to believe they had won the day and that at least the first stage of the retribution would be delivered before President Barack Obama flew off on Sept. 3 to Europe and to the G-20 summit. But then came a series of disappointments for them, beginning with Obama’s abrupt Aug. 31 decision to seek congressional authorization.

Still, the prevailing attitude was that the Israel Lobby would simply get to work whipping members of Congress into line with a variety of arguments (and a mix of threats and inducements) to ensure that a use-of-force resolution was passed and sent to the President’s desk.

The confidence was so high that there was no need to disguise what was afoot. Usually the mainstream media avoids mentioning the extraordinary influence of the Israel Lobby on Congress, but this time the New York Times displayed unusual candor describing who was egging on the march to war.

An 800-Pound Gorilla

In an article posted online Sept. 2, the Times reported, “Administration officials said the influential pro-Israel lobby group Aipac was already at work pressing for military action against the government of Mr. Assad. … One administration official, who, like others, declined to be identified discussing White House strategy, called Aipac ‘the 800-pound gorilla in the room,’ and said its allies in Congress had to be saying, ‘If the White House is not capable of enforcing this red line’ against the catastrophic use of chemical weapons, ‘we’re in trouble.’”

This warning about “loss of credibility” is a familiar one, artfully promoted in Saturday’s Wall Street Journal in an article by Leon Aron titled “America, Syria and the World.” Aron quotes a long list of Israel loyalists like Brookings Saban Center’s Kenneth M. Pollack, who warn that foreigners may come to view us as wimps if strong action is not taken against Syria.

A contrary point of view was expressed by former U.S. Ambassador Chas Freeman, who commented: “There is another possibility, however. And that is that they have come to see us as bullies, prone to resort to force rather than diplomacy when problems arise. The latter possibility puts a whole different face on Obama’s hesitation to go to war with Syria.”

In any case, to the surprise of many Washington insiders, the dreams of U.S. bombs raining down on another Mideast country began to slip away as many members of Congress listened to their constituents speaking out against war, and some even disbelieving the administration’s assessment because no hard, checkable evidence was being revealed to the American people.

Morose at CNN

As the march toward war began meandering off in unexpected directions, I was lucky enough to observe, up-close and personal, the angry reaction of some of Israel’s top American supporters on Monday evening. That was after Russia drew Obama a new map for how to reach the desired destination of removing chemical weapons from Assad’s arsenal without going to war.

After doing an interview on CNN International, I opened the studio door and almost knocked over a small fellow named Paul Wolfowitz, President George W. Bush’s former under-secretary of defense who in 2002-2003 had helped craft the fraudulent case for invading Iraq. And there standing next to him was former Sen. Joe Lieberman, the neocon from Connecticut who was a leading advocate for the Iraq War and pretty much every other potential war in the Middle East.

Finding myself in the same room with two gentlemen responsible for so much misery in the world, I fell back on my recent training in non-violence, as we watched Piers Morgan try earnestly to spin the day’s astounding events. On the tube earlier, Anderson Cooper sought counsel from Ari Fleischer, former spokesman for George W. Bush, and David Gergen, long-time White House PR guru.

Fleischer and Gergen were alternately downright furious over the Russian initiative to give peace a chance and disconsolate at seeing the prospect for U.S. military involvement in Syria disappear when we were oh so close. After some caustic and condescending outbursts, an almost surreally disconsolate mood set in. It looked like these fellas were not going to get their war.

Later remarks by Lieberman and Wolfowitz reflected a distinctly funereal atmosphere. I felt I had come to a wake with somberly dressed folks (no pastel ties this time) grieving for a recently, dearly-departed war.

Among Lieberman’s vapid comments was the hope-against-hope assertion that President Obama, of course, could still commit troops to war without congressional authorization. I thought to myself, wow, here’s a fellow who was a senator for 24 years and almost our vice president, and he does not remember that the Founders gave Congress the sole power to declare war in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution.

So I dug into my back pocket, pulled out my little copy of the Constitution, and carefully tore out Article 1. Then I lurked in the ornate elevator waiting area for Joe and Paul to come out. After the usual pleasantries (all politicians feel compelled to “remember” you once you say your name as though they should), I said, “Joe, I couldn’t believe what you said about the President not being required to get the approval of Congress before attacking a country like Syria. So, here; I tore out Article 1 of the Constitution for you; I have another copy, so you can keep it. Go home, read it, and see if what you just said is correct.”

It was a bad evening for war and for those pundits who like to joke about “giving war a chance.” For those of us who think war is not such a good idea – and truly should only be considered as an absolutely last resort – it was an uncommon day for rejoicing at the failure of the warmongers to again send young men and women to kill folks who pose no threat to us.

Salt in the Wounds

As sad as the war proponents were – including the cable news channels cheated out of some great video of flashing bombs illuminating the shattered buildings of ancient Damascus – they would face another humiliation in reading Thursday’s New York Times, which published an op-ed by Russian President Vladimir Putin. He made sensible points about the value of international law prohibiting one country from attacking another except in self-defense or with approval of the United Nations Security Council.

Sen. Bob Menendez, D-New Jersey, chair of the Foreign Relations Committee and an Israeli favorite, spoke for many Washington insiders by saying, “I was at dinner, and I almost wanted to vomit.” [For more on this topic, see Consortiumnews.com’s “Rewarding ‘Group Think’ on Syria.”]

Menendez had just cobbled together and forced through his committee a resolution, 10-to-7, to authorize the President to strike Syria with enough force to degrade Assad’s military. Now, at Obama’s request, the resolution was being put on the shelf.

Events were now moving swiftly away from a U.S. missile strike. Obama dispatched Kerry to Geneva to work out an agreement with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. But the hope for war still was not fully extinguished.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Michigan, chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, was still rooting for a chance to revive the military option and – like Lieberman – suggesting that the President didn’t really need congressional approval and shouldn’t be deterred by popular opposition either.

At a breakfast session with reporters on Sept. 11, Levin said, “I just don’t think you can be guided, when it comes to this kind of an issue, by public opinion polls. … It would not be a surprise at all to me, even if there were no congressional authority, that he [Obama] would use his Article 2 authority” as commander in chief. (Not incidentally, Levin has been the recipient of more money from AIPAC-related organizations than any other member of Congress.)

At this point, Israel and its lobby had every reason to be disappointed in another longtime close friend, John Kerry. He had succeeded in driving the war, which was to be fought over Obama’s “red line,” into what football fans might call the “red zone” but Kerry was unable to push the plan for missile strikes over the goal line.

Instead, Kerry clearly is under new orders from President Obama to figure out a way in cooperation with Minister Lavrov to defuse the crisis. Putin, Obama, Lavrov and Kerry have just won some laurels from the people around the world hoping to advance the cause of peace. But they won’t have the luxury of resting on them, while so many others in and around Syria have powerful incentives to reverse the progress made.

One still has to wonder what might revive prospects for U.S. missile strikes. Some in the Middle East are worried about the possibility that radical jihadists among the Syrian rebels might try to derail peace talks by launching a chemical weapons attack against Israeli targets with the hope that the provocation will be blamed on the Assad regime and set off a rush to retaliate.

Whether likely or not, it is a threat that the cooler heads in the Obama administration should anticipate and be ready to head off.

Ray McGovern works for Tell the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He served as an Army Infantry/Intelligence officer prior to working for 27 years as a CIA analyst. He is co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

Great article Mabel. Thanks for posting.

Just catching up with posts.

Things moving fast - will all chem wps be found, handed in/destroyed by mid 2014 or is this all just hogwash & a solar flare decides?

Int er est ing.

Posted by Traderabc in another place, this really, really is a MUST watch.

It's more than likely that more than 90% of the people of both this country and America have no idea what is being done and has already been done in their name. It is shameful.

Please don't be put off because it is 55mins long, every minute is worth watching.

mabel





http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-NIOthWsjk&feature=player_embedded#t=112

Sorry, it hasn't worked. Will try again.

mabel

No good, can't get it to work.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-NIOthWsjk&feature=player_embedded#t=112

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-NIOthWsjk&feature=player_embedded#t=112

Working now mabel.

On the chain icon above at side of U underline, FIRSTLY make sure you scrub out ......


http:// in that box, THEN enter your link address.

cheers GF.

Many thanks goldfinger.

mabel

Mabel, good vid. Everyone knows the truth. Everyone is free to talk about it.

No one wants to DO anything about it.
No one wants to forego the comforts.
No one cares when it isn't happening on their own doorstep.

So what does that make everyone?

Uncomfortable question I guess.

squirrel,

Thanks for watching, I wish others would watch it too.

It really is hard to know what exactly TO DO about it, other than talking to others. Mind you, the reaction of those I talk to is one of sheer disbelief, and the last thing they are going to do is watch the video.

My experience of talking to others about 9/11, 7/7 and the Boston bombing is that they find it inconceivable that these events could be anything other than muslim terrorism. I've given up trying to suggest that anything might have been an inside job. Much too uncomfortable for them.

The world is in utter turmoil and most people don't even realize, unless it happens to be affecting them at this particular moment.

The MSM has indeed been very successful in its task, especially in that they have made the majority of the public extremely fearful, which of course plays right into the hands of those wanting to impose more and more restrictions to our liberty. The internet has become the enemy of state control and I fear that there will be no limit to the lengths the state will go to restrict access.

mabel

Hi all, just a quick update.
Op went well yesterday. Lump removed and first set of nodes for testing.
Result will be before the 4th October.
Fingers crossed no spread.

"Houston ....we have a problem"....as they say

These are the "Official World Bank Figures"
- for "Total Reserves"
of .......The United States
- for the undermentioned years

2008 = 294,045,678,447

2009 = 404,098,902,069

2010 = 488,928,295,253

2011 = 537,267,272,428

2012 = 139,133,877,266

Link to World Bank Chart Re Above

http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FI.RES.TOTL.CD

The chart is headed up (very kindly)
- with the following clarification

(Quote)
Total reserves comprise holdings of monetary gold, special drawing rights, reserves of IMF members held by the IMF, and holdings of foreign exchange under the control of monetary authorities.

The gold component of these reserves is valued at year-end (December 31) London prices. Data are in current U.S. dollars.
(unquote)


Can anybody spot the "bit of a conundrum" ?????

The answer to the problem above......

The header to the "World Bank Chart" - states that "The Gold Element"
- of TOTAL reseves
- is calculated at the...London MARKET Rate - as of the December
(ie NOT the arbitrary $34 or so per oz ...as used in the FED balance sheet)

The USA alledgedly has a "gold element" reserve holding of... 8134 Tonnes
- on the back of a fag packet calculation using the market rate at the time, that's
- $430,000,000,000

The World Bank quotes the U.S
Total.... Reserves ...(Including... the Gold Element at market rates) as just,
- $139,133,877,266

ie TOTAL reserves.....are the thick end of
- $300,000,000,000 LESS
than what - just... the Gold Elememt.....should be.... !!!!!!

..............................................................................

Conjecture re - the above..

Has the World Bank....discounted ...any value being attributed to....leased gold
within the total reserves figure ??

If.. so - it might not only account for the - massive drop between 2011 & 2012
in not only the..... Total U.S Reserves
- but also for the massive drops of

.....Germany & France

Check 'em out :o)

Former "World Bank" Senior Counsel
- gives a great - insight