Sharesmagazine
 Home   Log In   Register   Our Services   My Account   Contact   Help 
 Stockwatch   Level 2   Portfolio   Charts   Share Price   Awards   Market Scan   Videos   Broker Notes   Director Deals   Traders' Room 
 Funds   Trades   Terminal   Alerts   Heatmaps   News   Indices   Forward Diary   Forex Prices   Shares Magazine   Investors' Room 
 CFDs   Shares   SIPPs   ISAs   Forex   ETFs   Comparison Tables   Spread Betting 
You are NOT currently logged in
 
Register now or login to post to this thread.

THE TALK TO YOURSELF THREAD. (NOWT)     

goldfinger - 09 Jun 2005 12:25

Thought Id start this one going because its rather dead on this board at the moment and I suppose all my usual muckers are either at the Stella tennis event watching Dim Tim (lose again) or at Henly Regatta eating cucumber sandwiches (they wish,...NOT).

Anyway please feel free to just talk to yourself blast away and let it go on any company or subject you wish. Just wish Id thought of this one before.

cheers GF.

Dil - 03 Dec 2017 09:40 - 79644 of 81564

Yeah , said he knew your mother too.

Fred1new - 03 Dec 2017 09:52 - 79645 of 81564

Manuel,

Re-read P 79639.

-=-=--=

Also, have a look at legal aspects present legislation on "porn" images and remember "one man's meat is another man's poison".

One of the problems of this area is the involvement of "sexual connotations" rather than the considering the "abuses" or "exploitations" of the "individuals", especially those who are more vulnerable due to age or other sensibilities.

It may be easier to have a simpler implementation using the latter to define laws.

As far as Damian, you, or I, are concerned, if in the course of police investigations "dubious" information or "evidence" of "criminal" activity is found which may be of relevance to potential criminal activity, it seems sensible to investigate.

(If a photo and May and a bill for the purchase of Cyanide were found in his draws it could be related to a future poisoning of a mistress, or rats in Downing Street.

(I can't quite remember what Damian himself was investigating at the time, prior to the police investigating his own activities.)

Perhaps, he also was guilty of intrusion in some form or other.





Fred1new - 03 Dec 2017 09:54 - 79646 of 81564

Dil.

No.

I checked my birth certificate.

Fred1new - 03 Dec 2017 13:07 - 79647 of 81564

Dil.

P 79644

But the most sobering thought about the comment may be that it could make you a half-brother.

God forbid.

But I have a guess, my mother's, childbearing period was over before your father was wearing nappies.

Haystack - 04 Dec 2017 00:20 - 79648 of 81564

Dil
:)

hilary - 04 Dec 2017 09:02 - 79649 of 81564

There's nothing I like more than porn. Especially with loads of garlic and a bit of chilli.

Fred1new - 04 Dec 2017 09:10 - 79650 of 81564

Try a little of Dil's Brawn!

jimmy b - 04 Dec 2017 09:51 - 79651 of 81564

Dil ....

Clocktower - 04 Dec 2017 15:18 - 79652 of 81564

Just take those former police offices pensions away in the same way as they would if they were still in the force. Action like that will make others hesitate from taking the medias blood money.

Fred1new - 04 Dec 2017 19:43 - 79653 of 81564

I am glad the centre is being diverted from the Pillar of Virtue of the Conservative party.

Mind it does reflect much of the actions of the present con party leadership its camp followers.

Mind he does have the support of Plebgate Mitchell and the Insignificant D Smith of University of Perugia fame.

Standards dear boy. Standards!

Clocktower - 06 Dec 2017 18:25 - 79654 of 81564

Do the Police Force have any standards Fred1?

Ask those that suffer in jail because of false police evidence, and all the altered notebook cases, and judges that support them to support the system.

Fred1new - 06 Dec 2017 18:48 - 79655 of 81564

Clock.

In every barrel of apples, there are a few bad ones.

In general, it seems to me that the standards of police conduct have been improved over my lifetime, while that of political figures has deteriorated.

This view may be due to easy access to information on the conduct of the latter and also more openness and overview of police "actions".

If either group "operate" or behave "criminally" "knowingly" then the individuals or groups should be investigated and prosecuted after "intent" is considered.

When more gullible I have met a few plausible "villains" and also a few who may have been falsely judged.

2517GEORGE - 08 Dec 2017 12:09 - 79656 of 81564

Nothing from Fred re 'momentum group' being investigated for possible election breaches, could involve criminal charges. Must have slipped his mind as he was so vociferous towards the Tories for similar accusations.

Fred1new - 08 Dec 2017 12:32 - 79657 of 81564

Small beer compared with funding by neo-cons from tax havens and dual nationality benefactors.

I suppose they have to pay their taxes in some way. or other.

Have a look at Bernard Jenkin, a leading light of brexiters, "expenses" claims.

How much property does Osborne in Ireland? Have a look at his expenses claims.

How does he deal "his heir with to his family's Irish baronetcy, of Ballentaylor and Ballylemon in County Waterford".

I am sorry that the supporters of "Labour" may have transgressed their expenses.


Just a small question, how many of the tory elite are lodge members?


-=-=-=-=-=

Just wondering if some of the dislike of the EU by some leading lights is due to the EU trying to tighten up on the tax havens and tax avoidance.

They don't wish to be embarrassed.



2517GEORGE - 08 Dec 2017 12:53 - 79658 of 81564

The point is Fred you never criticise or condemn Labour in the same way as you do the Tories, and as for momentum being just supporters, they were responsible for putting Corbyn in as leader.

ExecLine - 08 Dec 2017 13:36 - 79659 of 81564

If anyone watches the Graham Norton Show it doesn't take long to notice, that the nicest, warmest and most sincere and likeable guests are the ones who can laugh at themselves.

They are open, honest and have no hidden agendas.

And everyone knows, that guests don't get paid to come on the show. Most guests appear out of a contractual necessity so as to promote their most recent film. Others might, for instance, have written a book which has just been launched.

Accordingly, Graham always mentions the book and always shows a clip of the film.

Fairs fair. Graham helps them and gets the best out of them and the guests help to keep the show at the top of the ratings. But the best guests, are the ones who are 'open' and can laugh at themselves.

Fred, are you listening?

Fred1new - 08 Dec 2017 13:48 - 79660 of 81564

Firstly, Labour is not governing.

Secondly, I criticised Blair and some for the policies during their period of occupation of No 10.

Also, criticised the so call Kitchen cabinet form of that government.

Thirdly, much of what Corbyn suggests I have sympathy for. Whether some of the ideas are feasible or can be introduced in practice in the short term or even long term is questionable.

But I think much of the economic problems of the UK now are due to Cameron's and Osborne's initial mismanagement of the economy and "austerity" drive.

The social consequences are being felt disproportionally by the "poorer" sections of society.

As I said when Corbyn was elected leader of the Labour party, I wasn't sure of his abilities to be a leader of the party or a future PM., but "believed" him to being at the least, honesty and exhibiting what use to be called "common decency" to his fellow humanity.

I belong to no specific party but would prefer in general the "morality" of the Labour or the Liberal Democrat party to that of the present tory party. The latter at the moment seems to be manipulated by neo-cons utilising xenophobia as a stick to further their own greed.

-=-=-=-=

Fred1new - 08 Dec 2017 14:03 - 79661 of 81564

Exec,

Before I post I often have my tongue in my cheek, and my humour is often self-deprecating, especially when recognising my own fallibilities. (Of which, I have many.)

Try it sometime.

But what often gets me irritated is the arrogant disregard of those less endowed by those who consider themselves to be better endowed.

Often occurring when the parties hold differing opinions about a situation or subject.



Clocktower - 08 Dec 2017 14:18 - 79662 of 81564

Fred1new, You really make me LOL when you talk about the "morality" of Labour and Liberal Dems - if they were in power, which heaven help if they were and thank your lucky socks that they are not, they would be 1000 times worse if you took a serious look at the whole grubby bunch of them.

Look what happened when a Lib Dem was Deputy pm - Nick Clegg - what happened to his morals when it came to tuition fees for example. Gutless and he paid the price I am pleased to say.

Look at Gordon Brown and his comments about that "Bigoted Woman" - shows you just what the likes of these people really are. Let alone digging into lots of other Labour MP`s backgrounds and wealth.

Many conservative voters become Labour supports as they get old because they want higher pensions, free this and that, at the expense of the young - because they think they are "ENTITLED" to it, and are happy to see the poor sods pay for their holidays and comforts. I assume your one of those old codgers Fred.

Fred1new - 08 Dec 2017 14:42 - 79663 of 81564

CT.

It must be good to see somebody's failings give you pleasure or satisfaction.


It is good to think of you as supporting me in my old age.

Do keep it up but work a little harder.


Can I send you a list of things I desire but too mean to purchase for myself.
Register now or login to post to this thread.