overgrowth
- 06 Oct 2003 22:47
AdieH
- 23 May 2007 17:37
- 804 of 2037
Email sent to Facilitator and also received email from RW, if you want a copy please email AdieHurford@hotmail.com, quite interesting reading in regard to Empik...
David10B
- 23 May 2007 18:07
- 805 of 2037
AdieH why do you now feel the need to be so infantile?
I have expressed my point of view openly and honestly.
Nothing has changed despite your continued threats. Would you stiffle my right to freedom of expression?
COH concerns me, as did your rampings which incidentaly prompted my inital post on the company here.
I still feel that COH had a duty to its shareholders to inform them immediately EMPIK dumped it shares.
I most certainly still feel that if the COH board knew of the dumping by EMPIK before the placing, then such a placing is fraudulent.
Furthermore, and as continually stated, any credible director who makes a habit of immediately repsonding to his shareholders normally, and often over the most minor of matters, failed badly in not making the EMPIK news immediately available.
You may kindly send me a copy of Mr Worthington belated comments, althought they most probably now would be well concerted, however, it will be worth studying in order to make further unbiased conculsions.
My email is located in my profile.
Have a great evening.
AdieH
- 23 May 2007 18:11
- 806 of 2037
You do concern me and hopefully the right action will be taken against you, you made the slanderous comments not me...
David10B
- 23 May 2007 18:23
- 807 of 2037
Dear AdieH What will be will inevitable be.
As stated I admire your loyality, and tenacity, therefore I dont like to see you continue to make a fool of yourself.
Slander, sir be the malicious verbal false degradation.
Libel, of course being the written word.
I Sir, never resort to either, merely expounding upon known facts as I do.
So for this occasion please kindly let the passage time and whatever it brings, rather than the SP as previously suggested, talk for us both.
Please try not to let these issues frustrate you so much, as its the small PI that usually ends up getting shafted.
90% of small investors end up losing their shirts, it cant all be down to bad luck. Some listed companies go bust, some directors tell porkies.
I did not write the often bent rules of what can be a very dirty game. I just try to outwit them and stay ahead.
proteus
- 23 May 2007 21:38
- 808 of 2037
Well 10B,
I'm begining to get suspicious,you've had 8 days to come up with a view on forward figures but you have produced nothing.Are you going to provide figures to counter Numis ?
David10B
- 24 May 2007 08:57
- 809 of 2037
All in good time my friend, I am more interested right now in seeing the current events unfold before make a committment to this BB.
But there really will not be that much to say as my reply will be proft based.
AdieH
- 24 May 2007 10:22
- 810 of 2037
They are looking into the posts and hopefully action will be taken... Regards.
David10B
- 24 May 2007 10:47
- 811 of 2037
I am here AdieH.
I still believe that if Mr Worthington had prior Knowledge of the EMPIK intention to dump their holding, and Mr Worthington still went ahead with the new issue, knowing, as any prudent CEO would have, the effects thereof on the COH SP, then that Sir is not quite cosher.
Furthermore, I am fully prepared to state my opinion in a court of law without reserve.
Have a really great day.
Ultimate Cynic
- 24 May 2007 12:28
- 812 of 2037
David10B = knobhead!
UC.
AdieH
- 24 May 2007 12:54
- 813 of 2037
Lol, I think there more useful UC well mine certainly is compared to David...
David10B
- 24 May 2007 13:39
- 814 of 2037
In view of the unwarranted and really silly comments of some here.
In order to demonstrate my committment to my thoughts on the subject matter and in order to prevent a further deterioration of this BB, I have accordingly prepared a small information pack on the recent events surrounding the placing of shares by COH@ 41p.
This information has been forewarded to the DTI, "Vetting Section" email:-vetting.Section@dti.gsi.gov.uk
Correspondingly, I have no further comment to make, for the moment, which may or may not jeopardise any investigations the DTI may undertake.
If all is above board none will suffer unjustly.
Have a great day.
AdieH
- 24 May 2007 14:03
- 815 of 2037
Ha Ha Ha, IanT I do hope you are reading these posts...
foale
- 24 May 2007 14:13
- 816 of 2037
I see the "dog and pony show" continues...
"further deterioration" ..is that possible...lol
paulj
- 24 May 2007 15:09
- 817 of 2037
Let's hope the DTi's hard-pressed "vetting section" deliberates over David's "information pack" for several years... before tossing it in the bin. Let's also hope that David proves to be a man of his word by honouring his vow of silence until the vets finally deliver a verdict.
Can't see it myself. Seems to like the sound of his own keystrokes too much...
AdieH
- 25 May 2007 12:18
- 818 of 2037
Would suggest if you want a good thread to discuss COH then join iii, lots of interest of who has recently picked up EMPIK's stock and with the news of Lehmans interest (recent RNS) and the tie up with Starbucks...
David10B
- 25 May 2007 13:07
- 819 of 2037
As stated AdieH, there really is nothing else to add.
I told you here last week that there were more shares disposed of than that of the EMPIK dumping.
I dont think for one moment Starbucks has them tucked away, or indeed intents to start mopping them up, as Mr Worthington has already stated that COH is now too expensive as a take over target-besides you seemingly can not, as history and proverbs would have us believe, make silk purses from sow's ears
Thank you for your consideration, however I feel that there is far to much unopposed ramping on iii.
Having read the COH thread there it is obviously far too full of ultraist shareholders steeped in fideist aficionadoism, for my taste.
For example not one person there has seriously questioned where the huge over hang of surplus shares may be laying---and what happeds to the current deflated SP of COH if suddenly these shares, about 15 million of them, (the little devils that they may be), start to dribble on to the market?
This could be disasterous for the SP of COH which is already in shell shock.
No Sir, thank you for your most kind offer, but I seriously do not think that my appearance on iii would be welcomed by the grossly over enthusiastic COH rampers, I mean posters there, and therefore my tenure of writing space there would most postively be of a limited nature.
I am quite content, as stated , to sit on the side lines and let the SP talk.
Have a really great day.
paulj
- 25 May 2007 13:36
- 820 of 2037
If only you WOULD let the sp do the talking, David. Sadly, after saying you have "no further comment to make", you lasted all of a day before breaking your silence. With that sort of willpower you must be a tobacconist's dream.
David10B
- 25 May 2007 14:04
- 821 of 2037
Sir I really dont know how you were brought up. However I was brought up to answer question put to me immeduately and respectfully.
Should AdieH find it expedient to ask no further questions then obviously the need of an answer would be rather superfluous, would it not?
It was indeed AdiH who brought COH onto the MRL thread.
Would be much better to read the posts and follow what is going on before passing a comment.
Whatever it is you choice: try to enjoy your day and dont let the frustrations of life get to you-
paulj
- 25 May 2007 14:08
- 822 of 2037
You didn't even last an hour that time. So much for "letting the sp do the talking". It can't get a word in edgeways!
David10B
- 25 May 2007 14:19
- 823 of 2037
Do you wish that I reply to you paulj?